Matter of J.M.
|
| 20100398 |
In the Matter of J.M.
------------------
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant
State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
J.M., Respondent and Appellant
|
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick |
|
Nature of Action: |
Civil Commit of Sexual Predator
|
| Counsel: |
|
| Term: |
05/2011 Argument: 05/12/2011 04:00pm
|
| ND cite: |
2011 ND 105
|
| NW cite: |
799 N.W.2d 406
|
|
|
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the district court erred in determining that the state had mets its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that JM remains a sexually dangerous individual.
II. Whether JM remains a sexually dangerous individual pursuant to N.D.C.C 25-03.3 which would warrant continued civil commitment.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the district court's order denying petition for discharge is supported by clear and convincing evidence?
|
|
 Add Docket 20100398 RSS
|
| 1 | | 12/21/2010 | |
NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/16/2010 |
| 2 | | 12/21/2010 | |
ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 12/16/2010 |
| 3 | | 12/21/2010 | |
RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 02/04/2010 |
| 4 | | 02/01/2011 | |
TRANSCRIPT DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2010, & C.O.S. |
| 5 | | 02/01/2011 | |
DISK-TRA (11/10/10) E-MAILED |
| 6 | | 02/04/2011 | |
RECORD ON APPEAL |
| 7 | | 03/11/2011 | |
APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) |
| 8 | | 03/11/2011 | |
E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) |
| 9 | | 03/11/2011 | |
APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) |
| 10 | | 03/11/2011 | |
E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA) |
| 11 | | 03/17/2011 | |
Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20226) |
| 12 | | 03/18/2011 | |
Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD |
| 13 | | 03/18/2011 | |
Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD |
| 14 | | 04/11/2011 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF |
| 15 | | 04/11/2011 | |
DISK-AEB (E-MAILED) |
| 16 | | 04/13/2011 | |
RECEIVED CORRECTED TITLE PAGES FOR AEB. |
| 17 | | 04/18/2011 | |
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT (see folder) |
| 18 | | 05/09/2011 | |
MOTION FOR Waiver of Argument by Appellant |
| 19 | | 05/09/2011 | |
E-FILED MOTION |
| 20 | | 05/09/2011 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Appellant's argument waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)). Granted |
| 21 | | 05/11/2011 | |
MOTION FOR Waiver of Argument by Appellee |
| 22 | | 05/11/2011 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Granted |
| 23 | | 05/05/2011 | |
Arguments are waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) |
| 24 | | 05/12/2011 | |
APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.RApp.P. 34(f) |
| 25 | | 05/12/2011 | |
ARGUED: Waived under N.D.RApp.P. 34(f) |
| 26 | | 06/21/2011 | |
DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP. |
| 27 | | 06/21/2011 | |
UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam |
| 28 | | 06/23/2011 | |
Judgment Sent to Parties |
| 29 | | 07/28/2011 | |
MANDATE |
| 30 | | 08/01/2011 | |
RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |