Matter of J.M.

20100398 In the Matter of J.M.
------------------
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant
State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
J.M., Respondent and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
Nature of Action: Civil Commit of Sexual Predator
Counsel:
Appellant: Steven M. Light
Appellee: Lloyd Clayton Suhr , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 05/2011   Argument: 05/12/2011  Waived
ND cite: 2011 ND 105
NW cite: 799 N.W.2d 406


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the district court erred in determining that the state had mets its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that JM remains a sexually dangerous individual.
II. Whether JM remains a sexually dangerous individual pursuant to N.D.C.C  25-03.3 which would warrant continued civil commitment.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the district court's order denying petition for discharge is supported by clear and convincing evidence?

Add Docket 20100398 RSS Add Docket 20100398 RSS

Docket entries:
112/21/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/16/2010
212/21/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 12/16/2010
312/21/2010 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: 02/04/2010
402/01/2011 TRANSCRIPT DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2010, & C.O.S.
502/01/2011 DISK-TRA (11/10/10) E-MAILED
602/04/2011 RECORD ON APPEAL
703/11/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
803/11/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
903/11/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
1003/11/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
1103/17/2011 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20226)
1203/18/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
1303/18/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
1404/11/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF
1504/11/2011 DISK-AEB (E-MAILED)
1604/13/2011 RECEIVED CORRECTED TITLE PAGES FOR AEB.
1704/18/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT (see folder)
1805/09/2011 MOTION FOR Waiver of Argument by Appellant
1905/09/2011 E-FILED MOTION
2005/09/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Appellant's argument waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)). Granted
2105/11/2011 MOTION FOR Waiver of Argument by Appellee
2205/11/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Granted
2305/05/2011 Arguments are waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
2405/12/2011 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.RApp.P. 34(f)
2505/12/2011 ARGUED: Waived under N.D.RApp.P. 34(f)
2606/21/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2706/21/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2806/23/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
2907/28/2011 MANDATE
3008/01/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 07/29/2014