Paulson v. Paulson

20100399 Mark Paulson, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Cheryl Paulson, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce B. Haskell
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Robert G. Ackre
Appellee: Justin Dale Hager
Term: 04/2011   Argument: 04/06/2011  2:45pm
ND cite: 2011 ND 159
NW cite: 801 N.W.2d 746

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
A. Did the Trial Court error as a matter of law on remand in awarding spousal support when no additional evidence was presented indicating that a party is "incapable of self-support and had lost employment opportunities or foregone economic advantages due to the marriage.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
A.Did the trial court correctly determine the issue of spousal support in this matter?
B.Is the appellant barred from making any argument about the lower court's decision because the appellant did not make any such arguments first to the lower court?
C.Should this court award costs and attorney's fees as the current appeal is frivolous?
D.Should this court sanction the appellant for failure to follow several rules of appellate procedure, most specifically Rule 30?

Add Docket 20100399 RSS Add Docket 20100399 RSS

Docket entries:
112/21/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/17/2010
201/14/2011 RECORD ON APPEAL
301/26/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF
401/26/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX
501/31/2011 Corrected cover pages for ATB & ATA
602/01/2011 Corrected TOA for ATB
702/01/2011 DISK - atb (e-mailed)
802/24/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF
902/24/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1002/24/2011 DISK-AEB
1103/22/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1204/06/2011 APPEARANCES: Robert G. Ackre and Mark Paulson; Justin D. Hager
1304/06/2011 ARGUED: Ackre; Hager
1404/06/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1508/18/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
1608/18/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
1708/18/2011 CONCUR IN THE RESULT.: Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES
1808/18/2011 COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLEE.
1908/19/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
2009/19/2011 MANDATE
2109/21/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 08/29/2014