Paulson v. Paulson
Mark Paulson, Plaintiff and Appellant
Cheryl Paulson, Defendant and Appellee
South Central Judicial District,
Judge Bruce B. Haskell
|Nature of Action:||Divorce/Property Div./Alimony|
|Term:||04/2011  Argument: 04/06/2011|
|ND cite:||2011 ND 159|
801 N.W.2d 746
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
A. Did the Trial Court error as a matter of law on remand in awarding spousal support when no additional evidence was presented indicating that a party is "incapable of self-support and had lost employment opportunities or foregone economic advantages due to the marriage.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
A.Did the trial court correctly determine the issue of spousal support in this matter?
B.Is the appellant barred from making any argument about the lower court's decision because the appellant did not make any such arguments first to the lower court?
C.Should this court award costs and attorney's fees as the current appeal is frivolous?
D.Should this court sanction the appellant for failure to follow several rules of appellate procedure, most specifically Rule 30?
|Add Docket 20100399 RSS|
|1||12/21/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/17/2010|
|2||01/14/2011 RECORD ON APPEAL|
|3||01/26/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF|
|4||01/26/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX|
|5||01/31/2011 Corrected cover pages for ATB & ATA|
|6||02/01/2011 Corrected TOA for ATB|
|7||02/01/2011 DISK - atb (e-mailed)|
|8||02/24/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF|
|9||02/24/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX|
|11||03/22/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|12||04/06/2011 APPEARANCES: Robert G. Ackre and Mark Paulson; Justin D. Hager|
|13||04/06/2011 ARGUED: Ackre; Hager|
|14||04/06/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|15||08/18/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED|
|16||08/18/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning|
|17||08/18/2011 CONCUR IN THE RESULT.: Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES|
|18||08/18/2011 COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLEE.|
|19||08/19/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties|
|21||09/21/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|