State v. Nickel

20100410

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
William Joseph Nickel, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from:

District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Thomas J. Schneider

Nature of Action:

Counsel:

Appellant:		Julie Ann Lawyer , Att. General Office
Appellee:		Garrett David Ludwig

Term:

06/2011 Argument: 06/01/2011 10:45am

ND cite:

2011 ND 200

NW cite:

806 N.W.2d 155

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,^© a free download.

Issues:

Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred in finding that the Board of Pharmacy did not provide adequate notice of the final interim rule scheduling certain substances.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred in finding that the North Dakota Board of Pharmacy did not substantially comply with the notice requirement applicable to the adoption of an emergency rule.

Add Docket 20100410 RSS

Docket entries:

1	12/29/2010	NOTICE OF APPEAL: 12/28/2010
2	12/29/2010	ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 12/28/2010
3	01/27/2011	RECORD ON APPEAL
4	02/03/2011	TRANSCRIPT DATED NOVEMBER 19, 2010 & C.O.S.
5	02/07/2011	(This case is consolidated w/20100411 & 20100412; make all docket entries, except DIS & MAN codes,
6	02/07/2011	in this case)
7	03/15/2011	APPELLANT BRIEF
8	03/15/2011	APPELLANT APPENDIX
9	03/17/2011	DISK-ATB (E-MAILED)
10	04/07/2011	MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
11	04/07/2011	ACTION BY DEPUTY CLERK (MAE). Granted: 04/29/2011
12	04/26/2011	APPELLEE BRIEF
13	04/26/2011	DISK-AEB (E-MAILED)
14	05/20/2011	NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
15	06/01/2011	APPEARANCES: Julie A. Lawyer; Garrett D. Ludwig
16	06/01/2011	ARGUED: Julie A. Lawyer; Garrett D. Ludwig
17	06/01/2011	ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
18	10/18/2011	DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
19	10/18/2011	UNANIMOUS OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John
20	10/18/2011	(CONCUR IN THE RESULT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES
21	10/19/2011	Judgment Sent to Parties
22	11/09/2011	MANDATE
23	11/14/2011	RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
24	01/18/2012	Corrected/Substitute Opinion Page 3

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 05/20/2013