State v. Cain

20110010 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Dickey Joseph Cain, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Robert O. Wefald
Nature of Action: Assault
Counsel:
Appellant: Kent M. Morrow
Appellee: Pamela Ann Nesvig , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 09/2011   Argument: 09/06/2011  10:00am
ND cite: 2011 ND 213
NW cite: 806 N.W.2d 597

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1.Did the trial court err when it failed to grant Cain's Rule 29 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal?
2.Did the trial court err when it determined Cain to be a habitual offender without a hearing?
3.Did the trial court err when it denied Cain's Motion in Limine?
4.Did the trial court err when it denied Cain's Motion to Dismiss?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the trial court erred when it denied Cain's Rule 29 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal?
II. Whether the trial court erred by finding Cain a habitual offender?
III. Whether the trial court erred by denying Cain's Motion in Limine to exclude photographs and medical testimony at trial?
IV. Whether the trial court erred when it denied Cain's Motion to Dismiss based upon his request for a speedy trial?

Add Docket 20110010 RSS Add Docket 20110010 RSS

Docket entries:
101/10/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/06/2011
201/10/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 01/06/2011
302/04/2011 RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 78 & 79 (Not rec'd: #70 -- State's Exhs. 1-84)
402/24/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT
502/24/2011 ACTION BY TRIAL COURT (MTR). Granted: 04/14/2011
604/14/2011 DISK-tra (11/9/10 & 11/10/10) e-mailed
704/15/2011 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 11/9/10, 11/10/10 & 12/29/10 & C.O.S.
804/18/2011 DISK-tra (12/29/10) e-mailed
905/25/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
1005/25/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
1105/25/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
1205/25/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)
1305/27/2011 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20336).
1406/01/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.
1506/01/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.
1606/24/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF
1706/24/2011 DISK - aeb (e-mailed)
1807/18/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1909/06/2011 APPEARANCES: Kent Morrow/Pamela Nesvig
2009/06/2011 ARGUED: Morrow/Nesvig
2109/06/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2211/15/2011 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2311/15/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John
2411/15/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
2512/09/2011 MANDATE
2612/14/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/20/2014