Beaudoin v. JB Mineral Services
Dahn P. Beaudoin and J. Willard
Beaudoin, as Trustees of the
Wm. Beaudoin Irrevocable Mineral
Trust dated May 15, 1981, Plaintiffs and Appellees
JB Mineral Services, LLC, Defendant and Appellant
Southwest Judicial District,
Judge Zane Anderson
|Nature of Action:||Contracts|
|Term:||06/2011  Argument: 06/29/2011 2:45pm|
|ND cite:||2011 ND 229|
808 N.W.2d 671
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
I. The oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009 is valid under the rule in Irish Oil and Gas, Inc. 2011 ND 22 26 that a royalty clause alone is sufficient consideration for a lease.
II. The oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009 is valid because timely tender of bonus draft for payment was made on July 20, 2009 within 120 business days of the signing as a matter of law.
III. The oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009 is valid because, subject to the warranty clause of the lease, the corrective bonus draft dated January 6, 2010 was timely tendered on January 6, 2010 within 120 business days of the signing as a matter of law.
IV. The oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009 is not subject to termination or attorney fees and costs under 47-16-37 NDCC.
REPLY BRIEF ISSUES
I.Whether consideration failed when JB Minerals did not pay the bonus payments when promised.
II.Whether Beaudoins are estopped from terminating their signed OGL with warranty clause after they accepted tender of payment by presentment and before the deadline for final payment.
III.Whether the trial erred in construing the second corrective lease was an unrelated counter - offer to the first signed lease.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the Beaudoins for the following reasons: 1. The oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009 terminated pursuant to its terms due to JB's failure to make payment before the termination date indicated in the agreement.
2. The sight draft dated July 16, 2009, does not constitute tender of payment for the oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009, because JB did not fund the sight draft dated July 16, 2009.
3. The sight draft dated January 6, 2010, does not constitute tender of payment for the oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009, because the sight draft dated January 6, 2010 does not relate to the oil and gas lease signed July 20, 2009, or any other lease which the Beaudoins consented to.
4. The Beaudoins are entitled to have the oil and gas lease signed January 20, 2009, released from record and are entitled to damages, costs, and attorney's fees pursuant to N.D.C.C. 47-16-36 and 47-16-37.
|Add Docket 20110030 RSS|
|1||01/21/2011||NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/18/2011|
|2||02/14/2011||RECORD ON APPEAL|
|3||02/23/2011||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|4||02/23/2011||E-FILED MOTION (MAT)|
|5||02/24/2011||ACTION BY CLERK (MAT). Granted: 03/24/2011|
|6||03/08/2011||Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, with attachment|
|7||03/08/2011||MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE (RETAMCO OPERATING, INC.)|
|8||03/09/2011||ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Mot/File/ACB). Granted|
|9||03/08/2011||AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF (Retamco Operating, Inc.)|
|10||03/08/2011||MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT BY AMICUS CURIAE (see ACH on 5-20-11)|
|11||03/09/2011||ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Mot/for OA by Amicus Curiae). Denied|
|12||03/18/2011||Rec'd corrections to ACB.|
|13||03/08/2011||DISK - Rec'd corrected electronic copy of ACB (CD).|
|14||03/22/2011||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|15||03/22/2011||ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 03/31/2011|
|16||03/31/2011||MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|17||03/31/2011||ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted: 04/01/2011|
|20||04/06/2011||DISK - atb (CD-ROM)|
|21||05/03/2011||APPELLEE BRIEF & Addendum (e-filed)|
|22||05/03/2011||E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)|
|23||05/04/2011||Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20294)|
|24||05/06/2011||Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD|
|25||05/20/2011||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|26||05/20/2011||MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE REPLY BRIEF|
|27||05/20/2011||ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (MOT to file AC Reply Brief). Denied|
|28||05/20/2011||ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (AC MOT for oral argument -- See MOT entry on 3/8/11). Denied|
|30||05/25/2011||Received corrected pages 7 & 8 (included original signatures).|
|31||05/27/2011||Received corrected pages for RYB.|
|33||06/29/2011||APPEARANCES:Greg W. Hennessy;Charles J. Peterson & Jason J. Henderson;James L. Drought|
|34||06/29/2011||ARGUED:Greg W. Hennessy;Jason J. Henderson|
|35||06/29/2011||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|37||12/13/2011||UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.|
|38||12/13/2011||Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellees.|
|39||12/14/2011||Judgment Sent to Parties|
|40||12/27/2011||PETITION FOR REHEARING (e-filed) PDF|
|41||12/27/2011||E-FILED PETITION FOR REHEARING (PDF)|
|42||12/28/2011||Received non-substantive corrections to PER.|
|43||12/30/2011||RECEIVED $25 E-FILING SURCHARGE FOR PER (RECEIPT #20805).|
|44||01/04/2012||Received 7 copies of PER from Central Duplicating.|
|45||01/12/2012||ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER). Denied|
|47||01/25/2012||RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|