Wong v. State
Alman Andrew Wong, Petitioner and Appellant
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
South Central Judicial District,
Judge Bruce B. Haskell
|Nature of Action:||Post-Conviction Relief|
|Term:||09/2011  Argument: 09/08/2011 9:30am|
|ND cite:||2011 ND 201|
804 N.W.2d 382
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
 At the Judgment and Sentence of Defendant/Appellant, Alman Andrew Wong on December 16, 2009, should Mr. Wong's incapacity, because of a mental disease and NDCC 12.1-04-04, have prevented the trial judge from sentencing Mr. Wong?
 Was counsel for Defendant/Appellant, Alman Andrew Wong ineffective in his assistance of counsel because he knew of Mr. Wong's mental disease but did not:
1. Require the trial court's ordered evaluations of Mr. Wong's Motions to determine his competence and criminal responsibility be completed before Mr. Wong was sentenced.
2. Stop the sentencing proceeding because of Mr. Wong's mental disease.
3. After sentencing make a motion to have the judgment and sentence vacated because of Mr. Wong's mental disease.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I: Whether the Trial Court erred at the sentencing stage of the criminal proceeding; and if this issue is appealable because it was not pled in the petition for post-conviction relief.
II: Whether there was ineffective assistance of counsel.
|Add Docket 20110088 RSS|
|1||04/05/2011||NOTICE OF APPEAL: 04/01/2011|
|2||04/05/2011||ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 04/01/2011|
|3||04/27/2011||RECORD ON APPEAL & Separate Nos. 28, 29, & 30 (Not rec'd were Exhibits attached to #61)|
|4||05/10/2011||1st Supplemental Clerk's Certificate of Record dated 5/18/11 (Entry No. 61 - Exhibits 1 & 2).|
|5||05/17/2011||TRANSCRIPT DATED March 16, 2011 & C.O.S.|
|6||05/17/2011||DISK - tra (3/16/11) (e-mailed)|
|7||06/02/2011||APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)|
|8||06/02/2011||E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)|
|9||06/02/2011||APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)|
|10||06/02/2011||E-FILED APPENDIX (ATA)|
|11||06/02/2011||Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20341)|
|12||06/06/2011||Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD|
|13||06/06/2011||Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD|
|15||07/01/2011||DISK - AEB (CD)|
|16||07/19/2011||NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|17||09/08/2011||APPEARANCES: Benjamin C. Pulkrabek; Brian D. Grosinger|
|18||09/08/2011||ARGUED: Benjamin C. Pulkrabek; Brian D. Grosinger|
|19||09/08/2011||ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|21||10/18/2011||UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.|
|22||10/19/2011||Judgment Sent to Parties|
|23||10/28/2011||PETITION FOR REHEARING (e-filed)|
|24||10/28/2011||E-FILED BRIEF (PER)|
|25||10/31/2011||Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD|
|26||11/15/2011||ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - PER. Denied: 11/15/2011|
|28||12/01/2011||RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE|