City of Bismarck v. McCormick
City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellant
Daniel J. McCormick, Defendant and Appellee
South Central Judicial District,
Judge Sonna M. Anderson
|Nature of Action:||Dui/Dus|
|Term:||12/2011  Argument: 12/06/2011|
|ND cite:||2012 ND 53|
813 N.W.2d 599
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:|
1. Is the City allowed to appeal the District Court order granting an acquittal?
2. Whether the City needs to introduce its DUI ordinance in District Court when the case was transferred from Municipal Court by the defendant for a jury trial pursuant to NDCC 40-18-15.1.
3. Whether the defendant can raise the judicial notice issue after the jury has entered a guilty verdict.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
ISSUE FOR REVIEW NO. 1:
The City's appeal must be dismissed as the City cannot appeal from a judgment of acquittal.
ISSUE FOR REVIEW NO. 2:
The trial court properly granted McCormick's motion for judgment of acquittal.
|Add Docket 20110239 RSS|
|1||08/18/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/18/2011|
|2||09/02/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF|
|3||09/02/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX|
|4||09/02/2011 DISK - atb (e-mailed)|
|5||09/14/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL|
|6||10/04/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF|
|7||10/04/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX|
|8||10/04/2011 DISK - aeb (e-mailed)|
|9||10/06/2011 Table of Contents for AEA|
|10||10/10/2011 REPLY BRIEF|
|11||10/10/2011 DISK-RYB (E-MAILED)|
|12||11/16/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT|
|13||12/06/2011 APPEARANCES: Paul H. Fraase/Michael R. Hoffman|
|14||12/06/2011 ARGUED: Fraase/Hoffman|
|15||12/06/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST|
|16||03/15/2012 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED|
|17||03/15/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.|
|18||03/16/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties|
|19||03/29/2012 PETITION FOR REHEARING|
|20||03/29/2012 DISK - per (e-mailed)|
|21||04/10/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Denied|