Matter of Rubey

20110322 In the Matter of Larry Gene Rubey
---------------------------------
Ladd R. Erickson,
State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Larry Gene Rubey, Respondent and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, McLean County
Judge Bruce B. Haskell
Nature of Action: Civil Commit of Sexual Predator
Counsel:
Appellant: Gregory Ian Runge
Appellee: Ladd Ronald Erickson , State's Attorney
Term: 04/2012   Argument: 04/02/2012  Waived
ND cite: 2012 ND 133
NW cite: 818 N.W.2d 731


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the Trial Court Erred in Concluding that there was Clear and Convincing Evidence that the Respondent/Appellant was likely to Engage in Further Acts of Sexually, Predatory Conduct which would Constitute a Danger to the Physical or Mental Health of Others and has Serious Difficulty in Controlling his Behavior.

Add Docket 20110322 RSS Add Docket 20110322 RSS

Docket entries:
111/09/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 11/04/2011
211/09/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 11/04/2011
312/20/2011 TRANSCRIPT DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, & C.O.S.
412/21/2011 DISK-TRA (9/30/11) E-MAILED
512/21/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS. 1-52)
602/01/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
702/01/2012 E-FILED MOTION
802/01/2012 ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK. Granted: 02/03/2012
902/03/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF
1002/03/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1102/03/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1202/03/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
1302/07/2012 Received non-substantive corrections to ATB & ATA.
1402/09/2012 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20862).
1502/14/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.
1602/14/2012 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.
1703/05/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1803/05/2012 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1903/05/2012 DISK - aeb (e-miled)
2003/14/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2103/14/2012 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT
2203/23/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Granted
2303/23/2012 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
2404/02/2012 APPEARANCES: Waived by Appellant under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f); for Appellee under N.D.R.App.P 34(a)
2504/02/2012 ARGUED: Waived by Appellant under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f); for Appellee under N.D.R.App.P 34(a)
2607/12/2012 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2707/12/2012 SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2807/12/2012 DISSENTING): Kapsner, Carol Ronning: DISSENT
2907/13/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
3008/15/2012 MANDATE
3108/17/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/16/2014