Matter of Rubey

20110322

In the Matter of Larry Gene Rubey
---------------------------------
Ladd R. Erickson,
State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Larry Gene Rubey, Respondent and Appellant

Appeal from:

District Court, South Central Judicial District, McLean County
Judge Bruce B. Haskell

Nature of Action:

Civil Commit of Sexual Predator

Counsel:

Appellant:		Gregory Ian Runge
Appellee:		Ladd Ronald Erickson , State's Attorney

Term:

04/2012 Argument: 04/02/2012 04:00pm

ND cite:

2012 ND 133

NW cite:

818 N.W.2d 731

Issues:

Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the Trial Court Erred in Concluding that there was Clear and Convincing Evidence that the Respondent/Appellant was likely to Engage in Further Acts of Sexually, Predatory Conduct which would Constitute a Danger to the Physical or Mental Health of Others and has Serious Difficulty in Controlling his Behavior.

Add Docket 20110322 RSS

Docket entries:

1	11/09/2011	NOTICE OF APPEAL: 11/04/2011
2	11/09/2011	ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 11/04/2011
3	12/20/2011	TRANSCRIPT DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011, & C.O.S.
4	12/21/2011	DISK-TRA (9/30/11) E-MAILED
5	12/21/2011	ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS. 1-52)
6	02/01/2012	MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
7	02/01/2012	E-FILED MOTION
8	02/01/2012	ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK. Granted: 02/03/2012
9	02/03/2012	APPELLANT BRIEF
10	02/03/2012	E-FILED BRIEF
11	02/03/2012	APPELLANT APPENDIX
12	02/03/2012	E-FILED APPENDIX
13	02/07/2012	Received non-substantive corrections to ATB & ATA.
14	02/09/2012	Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20862).
15	02/14/2012	Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating.
16	02/14/2012	Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating.
17	03/05/2012	APPELLEE BRIEF
18	03/05/2012	APPELLEE APPENDIX
19	03/05/2012	DISK - aeb (e-miled)
20	03/14/2012	NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
21	03/14/2012	REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT
22	03/23/2012	ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Granted
23	03/23/2012	S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
24	04/02/2012	APPEARANCES: Waived by Appellant under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f); for Appellee under N.D.R.App.P 34(a)
25	04/02/2012	ARGUED: Waived by Appellant under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f); for Appellee under N.D.R.App.P 34(a)
26	07/12/2012	DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
27	07/12/2012	SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
28	07/12/2012	DISSENTING): Kapsner, Carol Ronning: DISSENT
29	07/13/2012	Judgment Sent to Parties
30	08/15/2012	MANDATE
31	08/17/2012	RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 06/19/2013