Wheeler v. Southport Seven Planned Unit Dev.

20110323 Sharon Wheeler, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Southport Seven Planned Unit
Development, Carl Bye, Individually
and as a member of the Board of
Directors, Defendants and Appellees

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
Nature of Action: Real Property
Counsel:
Appellant: Deborah Joan Carpenter
Appellee: Charles (Casey) L. Chapman
Term: 04/2012   Argument: 04/03/2012  2:45pm
ND cite: 2012 ND 201
NW cite: 821 N.W.2d 746

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Listen to recording of oral argument in RM format
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. What is the standard of review on appeal?
II. Whether the district court erred in granting partial summary judgment regarding the authority of Southport 7 to impose dues or assessments for non-common areas?
III. Whether the district erred in its determination regarding the existence of a contract and its scope?
IV. Whether the district erred in its determination of costs to Southport 7?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
III. Did the District Court correctly determine that Wheeler had failed to present a material issue of fact to state a legal claim either for severance of Wheeler's property from the Southport 7 project or for termination of the Southport 7 project?


Add Docket 20110323 RSS Add Docket 20110323 RSS

Docket entries:
111/09/2011 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 11/07/2011
211/09/2011 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 11/07/2011
311/09/2011 Acknowlegment of Order for Transcript.
412/22/2011 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL dated 12-21-11 (entry nos. 1-58) (no entry no. 32).
512/27/2011 TRANSCRIPT DATED 04-25-11 & C.O.S.
612/27/2011 DISK - TRA (04-25-11)
701/26/2012 District Court Ordered correction or modification of the Record
802/01/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
902/01/2012 E-FILED MOTION
1002/02/2012 ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK. Granted: 02/13/2012
1102/13/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF
1202/13/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1302/13/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1402/13/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
1502/14/2012 Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #20868)
1602/23/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
1702/23/2012 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
1803/14/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1903/19/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
2003/19/2012 DISK of AEB (e-mailed)
2103/19/2012 APPELLEE APPENDIX
2203/20/2012 Received $25.00 surcharge for e-filed aeb
2303/23/2012 Received 6 copies of appendix from Central Duplicating
2404/02/2012 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
2504/02/2012 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Graff, Benny A.
2604/03/2012 APPEARANCES: Deborah J. Carpenter; Casey L. Chapman
2704/03/2012 ARGUED: Deborah J. Carpenter; Casey L. Chapman
2804/03/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2909/27/2012 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
3009/27/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John
3109/27/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
3209/28/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
3310/23/2012 MANDATE
3410/26/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 07/23/2014