State v. Vetter
|
| 20120015 |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Alois Vetter, Defendant and Appellant
|
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
East Central Judicial District,
Cass County
Judge Steven E. McCullough |
|
Nature of Action: |
Assault
|
| Counsel: |
|
| Term: |
09/2012 Argument: 09/18/2012 10:00am
|
| ND cite: |
2013 ND 4
|
| NW cite: |
826 N.W.2d 334
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
|
|
|
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I.A vehicle should not be considered a "dangerous weapon" within the meaning laid out in N.D.C.C. 12.1-01-04(6).
A.The language of N.D.C.C. 12.1-01-04(6) clearly indicates a vehicle is not meant to be included under that statute.
B.Considering a vehicle to be a dangerous weapon creates a multitude of other problems.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether sufficient evidence allowed the jury to reasonably infer the Defendant - in his humvee - overpowered and trampled the victim and, accordingly, used a dangerous weapon in committing aggravated assault.
|
|
 Add Docket 20120015 RSS
|
| 1 | | 01/11/2012 | |
NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/09/2012 |
| 2 | | 01/11/2012 | |
ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 01/09/2012 |
| 3 | | 02/09/2012 | |
Electronic RECORD ON APPEAL dated 2-8-12 (Entry Nos. 1-69; 71; 73-75; 77-89;91; & 97-158) (Not |
| 4 | | 02/09/2012 | |
sent: 70; 72; 76; and 92-96---Exhibits) |
| 5 | | 02/27/2012 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT |
| 6 | | 02/27/2012 | |
E-FILED MOTION |
| 7 | | 02/27/2012 | |
ACTION BY TRIAL COURT. Granted: 03/02/2012 |
| 8 | | 03/02/2012 | |
TRANSCRIPTS DATED 10-18-11; 10-19-11; 10-20-11, & 1-9-12 (4 vols.) & C.O.S. |
| 9 | | 03/02/2012 | |
DISK - tra (10/18/11;10/19/11;10/20/11; & 1/9/12) (e-mailed) |
| 10 | | 03/06/2012 | |
Corrected cover page for Transcript of Sentencing Hearing |
| 11 | | 04/09/2012 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF |
| 12 | | 04/09/2012 | |
E-FILED MOTION |
| 13 | | 04/09/2012 | |
ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 05/11/2012 |
| 14 | | 05/07/2012 | |
MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF |
| 15 | | 05/07/2012 | |
E-FILED MOTION |
| 16 | | 05/08/2012 | |
ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted: 06/25/2012 |
| 17 | | 06/25/2012 | |
APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) |
| 18 | | 06/25/2012 | |
E-FILED BRIEF |
| 19 | | 06/25/2012 | |
APPELLANT APPENDIX |
| 20 | | 06/25/2012 | |
E-FILED APPENDIX |
| 21 | | 06/29/2012 | |
Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21239) |
| 22 | | 07/03/2012 | |
Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating |
| 23 | | 07/03/2012 | |
Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating |
| 24 | | 07/24/2012 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF |
| 25 | | 07/24/2012 | |
E-FILED BRIEF |
| 26 | | 07/26/2012 | |
Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating |
| 27 | | 07/30/2012 | |
Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #21270) |
| 28 | | 08/10/2012 | |
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT |
| 29 | | 09/18/2012 | |
APPEARANCES: Daniel E. Gast; Cherie L. Clark |
| 30 | | 09/18/2012 | |
ARGUED: Daniel E. Gast; Cherie L. Clark |
| 31 | | 09/18/2012 | |
ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST |
| 32 | | 01/23/2013 | |
DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED |
| 33 | | 01/23/2013 | |
SPLIT OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John |
| 34 | | 01/23/2013 | |
CONCUR IN THE RESULT: Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES |
| 35 | | 01/23/2013 | |
CONCUR: VandeWalle, Gerald W.: CONCUR |
| 36 | | 01/24/2013 | |
Judgment Sent to Parties |
| 37 | | 02/22/2013 | |
MANDATE |
| 38 | | 03/01/2013 | |
RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |