George v. Veeder

20120081 David George and
Marjorie George, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
Rosalie Veeder, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, Northwest Judicial District, McKenzie County
Judge David W. Nelson
Nature of Action: Real Property
Counsel:
Appellant: Irvin B. Nodland
Appellee: Amy Marie Oster
Term: 05/2012   Argument: 05/07/2012  9:00am
ND cite: 2012 ND 186
NW cite: 820 N.W.2d 731

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Was it error for the District Court to grant summary judgment to quiet title in the defendant based on the evidence presented and error to deny amendment of the complaint to allow consideration of reformation of contract upon the grounds that issue was moot?
2. Was the District Court permitted to decide by summary judgment that this action for Reformation of Contract is barred by the Statute of Limitations or laches?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1.Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment in Rosalie Veeder's favor.
II.Whether the district court erred in deciding the Georges' motion to amend their complaint was rendered moot by its order granting summary judgment.

Add Docket 20120081 RSS Add Docket 20120081 RSS

Docket entries:
101/30/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/30/2012
202/29/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS. 1-30)
303/09/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF
403/09/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
503/14/2012 DISK-ATB (E-MAILED)
603/15/2012 RECEIVED CORRECTED PAGES FOR ATB
704/11/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
804/11/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
904/11/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1004/12/2012 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20971)
1104/13/2012 Received 7 copies of AEB from Central Duplicating
1205/07/2012 APPEARANCES: Irvin Nodland/Amy Oster
1305/07/2012 ARGUED: Nodland/Oster
1405/07/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1508/30/2012 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
1608/30/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
1708/30/2012 COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLEE
1808/31/2012 Judgment Sent to Parties
1910/02/2012 MANDATE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 04/18/2014