Krueger v. Tran

20120152 Shannon (Fried) Krueger, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Hau Tran, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Southeast Judicial District, Barnes County
Judge Jay A. Schmitz
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Carl Louis Martineck
Appellee: Irvin B. Nodland
Term: 09/2012   Argument: 09/06/2012  2:45pm
ND cite: 2012 ND 227
NW cite: 822 N.W.2d 044

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Was the District Court's finding that there was a material change in circumstances of JMT clearly erroneous?
2. Was the District Court's finding that a change of custody was necessary to serve the best interests of JMT clearly erroneous?

Add Docket 20120152 RSS Add Docket 20120152 RSS

Docket entries:
103/15/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 03/15/2012
203/15/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 03/15/2012
303/23/2012 Acknowledgment of Order for Transcript from Court Reporter Brenda M. Richards
404/05/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED October 31, 2011 & C.O.S.
504/19/2012 DISK of tra dated 10-31-11
604/16/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS.1-253)
705/15/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
805/16/2012 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 05/17/2012
905/17/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF (pdf)
1005/17/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1105/17/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1205/17/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
1305/21/2012 Received $25.00 surcharge for ATB and $7.00 surcharge for ATA (receipt #21191)
1405/31/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
1505/31/2012 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
1606/12/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1706/12/2012 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1806/12/2012 DISK-AEB (E-MAILED)
1906/29/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF
2006/29/2012 E-FILED MOTION
2106/29/2012 ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK. Granted: 07/03/2012
2207/03/2012 REPLY BRIEF of Appellant
2307/03/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
2407/10/2012 Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD
2508/09/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2609/06/2012 APPEARANCES: Carl L. Martineck/Irvin B. Nodland
2709/06/2012 ARGUED: Martineck/Nodland
2809/06/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2910/23/2012 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
3010/23/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
3110/23/2012 (CONCUR IN THE RESULT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: CON/RES
3210/23/2012 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
3310/24/2012 Judgment E-Mailed to Parties
3412/06/2012 MANDATE
3512/10/2012 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/19/2014