Hageman v. Hageman

20120183 Nicholas David Hageman, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Amber Dawn Hageman,
n/k/a Amber Dawn Sagert, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Judge Lawrence E. Jahnke
Nature of Action: Child Cust & Support (Div.\other)
Counsel:
Appellant: Deanna F. Longtin
Appellee: Kari RaNae Winning
Term: 09/2012   Argument: 09/12/2012  2:45pm
ND cite: 2013 ND 29
NW cite: 827 N.W.2d 023

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I.Did the district court err when it determined Amber had not provided sufficient evidence to grant her request for primary residential responsibility of K.N.H. under the factors of N.D.C.C. 14-09?
II.Did the district court err when it determined Amber was required to provide sufficient evidence to prove that K.N.H's removal from the Grand Forks area was in his best interest?

Reply Brief Issues
I.The district court erred when it determined Amber had not provided sufficient evidence to grant her request for primary residential responsibility of K.N.H. under the factors of N.D.C.C. 14-09 because it failed to give adequate consideration to the evidence presented through testimony and affidavit.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I.Whether the District Court erred when it determined that the statutory best interest factors favored an award of primary residential responsibility to Nick.
II.Whether the District Court erred when it considered Amber's relocation to St. Thomas in its assessment of the statutory best interest factors.

Add Docket 20120183 RSS Add Docket 20120183 RSS

Docket entries:
104/05/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 04/03/2012
204/05/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 04/03/2012
304/12/2012 Acknowledgment of OTR fro Marsha Allmaras
405/04/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL (ENTRY NOS.1-88)
505/11/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED 11/9/2011 & C.O.S.
605/11/2012 DISK-TRA (11/9/2011) E-MAILED
706/19/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF)
806/19/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
906/19/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1006/19/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
1106/21/2012 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21227)
1206/25/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
1306/25/2012 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
1407/19/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1507/19/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1607/23/2012 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #21258)
1707/26/2012 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB from CSD
1808/02/2012 REPLY BRIEF of Appellant
1908/02/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
2008/06/2012 Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD
2108/09/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2209/12/2012 APPEARANCES: Deanna F. Longtin; Kari R. Winning
2309/12/2012 ARGUED: Deanna F. Longtin; Kari R. Winning
2409/12/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2502/26/2013 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2602/26/2013 SPLIT OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
2702/26/2013 Dissent: Maring, Mary Muehlen: DISSENT
2802/26/2013 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
2902/27/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
3003/28/2013 MANDATE
3104/02/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/19/2014