Interest of J.M. | |||||||
| 20120253 |
In the Interest of J.M.
--------------------- Lloyd Suhr, Burliegh County Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.M., Respondent and Appellant | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Burleigh County
Judge Thomas J. Schneider | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Civil Commit of Sexual Predator | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 11/2012  Argument: 11/28/2012 04:00pm | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2013 ND 11 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
826 N.W.2d 315
| ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: 1.Whether the State's evidence was based on science where Dr. Krance testified she did not adhere to a generally accepted principle in the scientific community of psychologists before rendering a diagnosis on respondent? Appellee's Statement of the Issues: Whether the district court abused its discretion in considering the opinion of Dr. Jennifer Krance in its Order denying the Appellant's (hereafter J.M.) Petition for Discharge? | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 05/31/2012 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/31/2012 | ||
| 2 | 05/31/2012 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/31/2012 | ||
| 3 | 06/05/2012 | Acknowledgment of OTR from Jane Gillig-Hoekstra | ||
| 4 | 06/26/2012 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 06/25/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-7, 9-35, 37-179,items not sent 8, & 36) | ||
| 5 | 07/13/2012 | TRANSCRIPT DATED April 5, 2012 & C.O.S. | ||
| 6 | 07/23/2012 | DISK - tra (4/5/12) (e-mailed) | ||
| 7 | 08/23/2012 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 8 | 08/23/2012 | ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 08/29/2012 | ||
| 9 | 09/05/2012 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 10 | 09/05/2012 | ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 09/04/2012 | ||
| 11 | 09/04/2012 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | ||
| 12 | 09/04/2012 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 13 | 09/05/2012 | DISK NONCOMPLIANCE (ATB) (Letter from Mr. Edinger dated 9-4-12) | ||
| 14 | 10/04/2012 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 15 | 10/04/2012 | DISK-AEB (e-mailed) | ||
| 16 | 10/18/2012 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | ||
| 17 | 11/09/2012 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | ||
| 18 | 11/28/2012 | APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a) | ||
| 19 | 11/28/2012 | ARGUED: Waived | ||
| 20 | 01/23/2013 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | ||
| 21 | 01/23/2013 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V. | ||
| 22 | 01/23/2013 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee | ||
| 23 | 01/24/2013 | Judgment Sent to Parties | ||
| 24 | 02/25/2013 | MANDATE | ||
| 25 | 02/28/2013 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |