Interest of J.M.

20120253 In the Interest of J.M.
---------------------
Lloyd Suhr, Burliegh County
Assistant State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
J.M., Respondent and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Thomas J. Schneider
Nature of Action: Civil Commit of Sexual Predator
Counsel:
Appellant: Richard Edward Edinger
Appellee: Lloyd Clayton Suhr , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 11/2012   Argument: 11/28/2012  Waived
ND cite: 2013 ND 11
NW cite: 826 N.W.2d 315


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1.Whether the State's evidence was based on science where Dr. Krance testified she did not adhere to a generally accepted principle in the scientific community of psychologists before rendering a diagnosis on respondent?


Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the district court abused its discretion in considering the opinion of Dr. Jennifer Krance in its Order denying the Appellant's (hereafter J.M.) Petition for Discharge?

Add Docket 20120253 RSS Add Docket 20120253 RSS

Docket entries:
105/31/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 05/31/2012
205/31/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/31/2012
306/05/2012 Acknowledgment of OTR from Jane Gillig-Hoekstra
406/26/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 06/25/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-7, 9-35, 37-179,items not sent 8, & 36)
507/13/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED April 5, 2012 & C.O.S.
607/23/2012 DISK - tra (4/5/12) (e-mailed)
708/23/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
808/23/2012 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 08/29/2012
909/05/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
1009/05/2012 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 09/04/2012
1109/04/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF)
1209/04/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1309/05/2012 DISK NONCOMPLIANCE (ATB) (Letter from Mr. Edinger dated 9-4-12)
1410/04/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1510/04/2012 DISK-AEB (e-mailed)
1610/18/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1711/09/2012 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
1811/28/2012 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)
1911/28/2012 ARGUED: Waived
2001/23/2013 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
2101/23/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2201/23/2013 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellee
2301/24/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
2402/25/2013 MANDATE
2502/28/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 08/29/2014