Coppage v. State

20120267 Ernest Coppage, Petitioner, Appellee
and Cross-Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent, Appellant
and Cross-Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Donald L. Jorgensen
Nature of Action: Post-Conviction Relief
Counsel:
Appellant: Lloyd Clayton Suhr , Asst. State's Attorney
Appellee: Monty Grant Mertz
Term: 11/2012   Argument: 11/29/2012  11:00am
ND cite: 2013 ND 10
NW cite: 826 N.W.2d 320

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format
Listen to recording of oral argument in RM format
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1) Whether the district court erred in granting Coppage's Application for Post-Conviction Relief?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court Judgment granting Coppage's application for Post Conviction Relief should be affirmed?
Whether the District Court erred by not ruling on Coppage's claim of Prosecutorial Misconduct?
Whether the District Court erred by not ruling on Coppage's claim that his right to a fair trial was violated through plain error?

Add Docket 20120267 RSS Add Docket 20120267 RSS

Docket entries:
106/08/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/06/2012
206/08/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 06/07/2012
306/21/2012 NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL (cross appeal filed 6/20/12)
407/09/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 07/06/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-43, 47-51, 55-164)
507/09/2012 Items not sent 44-46- Exhibits, and 52-54-Court Reporter notes
607/25/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED 04/20/2012 & C.O.S.
707/25/2012 DISK-Transcript dated 04/20/12 (e-mailed)
808/31/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF
908/31/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1008/31/2012 DISK-ATB (e-mailed)
1109/07/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (adjusted sua sponte due to service of ATB date)
1209/07/2012 ACTION BY CLERK (adjusted sua sponte due to service of ATB date). Granted: 10/04/2012
1309/07/2012 8 correct cover pages for ATB & C.O.S.
1410/03/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1510/03/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1610/08/2012 Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
1710/12/2012 REPLY BRIEF
1810/18/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1910/19/2012 Received 8 copies each of cover in gray & table of contents for RYB
2010/23/2012 DISK-RYB (E-MAILED)
2110/24/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME CROSS APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
2210/24/2012 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 11/13/2012
2310/25/2012 The State does not object to extension of Cross Appellant's Reply Brief
2411/06/2012 E-filing surcharge for AEB paid through inter-departmental billing
2511/08/2012 REPLY BRIEF of Cross-Appellant
2611/08/2012 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB of cross/appellant)
2711/13/2012 Received 7 cc of RYB of Cross-Appellant from Central Duplicating
2811/29/2012 APPEARANCES: Lloyd C. Suhr; Monty G. Mertz
2911/29/2012 ARGUED: Lloyd C. Suhr; Monty G. Mertz
3011/29/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
3101/23/2013 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
3201/23/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
3301/24/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
3402/21/2013 MANDATE
3502/26/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 08/01/2014