State v. Wolfgram | |||||||
| 20120286 |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v. Patrick Wayne Wolfgram, Defendant and Appellant | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
Southeast Judicial District,
Richland County
Judge Richard W. Grosz | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Homicide | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 11/2012 Argument: 11/21/2012 04:00pm | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2012 ND 251 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
823 N.W.2d 786
| ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: The trial court imposed an excessive sentence on the defendant. Appellee's Statement of the Issues: Whether the trial court imposed an excessive sentence on the Defendant. | ||||||
 Add Docket 20120286 RSS
| |||||||
| 1 | 07/11/2012 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/26/2012 | ||
| 2 | 07/11/2012 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 06/26/2012 | ||
| 3 | 07/26/2012 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 07/25/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-20) | ||
| 4 | 08/15/2012 | TRANSCRIPT DATED 05/29/2012 & C.O.S. | ||
| 5 | 08/15/2012 | DISK- Transcript dated 05/29/2012 (e-mailed) | ||
| 6 | 09/24/2012 | APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF) | ||
| 7 | 09/24/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | ||
| 8 | 09/24/2012 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 9 | 09/24/2012 | E-FILED APPENDIX | ||
| 10 | 10/05/2012 | Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21534) | ||
| 11 | 10/08/2012 | Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating | ||
| 12 | 10/08/2012 | Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating | ||
| 13 | 10/17/2012 | REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE | ||
| 14 | 10/17/2012 | E-FILED MOTION | ||
| 15 | 10/18/2012 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | ||
| 16 | 10/17/2012 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 17 | 10/17/2012 | DISK - aeb (e-mailed) | ||
| 18 | 10/24/2012 | NO ACTION TAKEN (REQUEST TO WAIVE OA BY APPELLEE) | ||
| 19 | 10/24/2012 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | ||
| 20 | 11/21/2012 | APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a) | ||
| 21 | 11/21/2012 | ARGUED: None - waived | ||
| 22 | 12/18/2012 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP. | ||
| 23 | 12/18/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam | ||
| 24 | 12/19/2012 | Judgment Sent to Parties | ||
| 25 | 01/15/2013 | MANDATE | ||
| 26 | 01/22/2013 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |