State v. Baesler

20120295 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Lowell Lee Baesler, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Morton County
Judge Gail Hagerty
Nature of Action: Drugs/Contraband
Counsel:
Appellant: Kent M. Morrow
Appellee: Brian David Grosinger , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 11/2012   Argument: 11/20/2012  Waived
ND cite: 2012 ND 262
NW cite: 823 N.W.2d 786


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Did the trial court err when it denied Baesler's Motion to Suppress?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the Trial Court erred in Denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence.

Add Docket 20120295 RSS Add Docket 20120295 RSS

Docket entries:
107/20/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/19/2012
207/20/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 07/19/2012
307/20/2012 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
407/20/2012 This case is consolidated w/20120296. Make all docket entries, except ROA, DIS, & MAN
507/20/2012 codes, in this case
607/23/2012 Acknowledgment of Order for Transcript from Ronda Colby
708/13/2012 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 6/29/12 & 7/5/12 & C.O.S.
808/13/2012 DISK-TRA (6/29/12 & 7/5/12) E-MAILED
908/15/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 08/14/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-63)
1008/17/2012 AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 08/16/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-49, 51-64) (ENTRY NO. 50 deleted)
1109/21/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF
1209/21/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1309/21/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1409/21/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
1509/24/2012 Received surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21508)
1609/25/2012 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from CSD
1709/25/2012 Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from CSD
1810/19/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1910/19/2012 DISK - aeb (CD-ROM)
2010/23/2012 SITTING WITH THE COURT: McClintock, Jr., John C.
2111/02/2012 MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT
2211/02/2012 E-FILED MOTION
2311/02/2012 MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE
2411/13/2012 NO ACTION TAKEN (MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT)
2511/13/2012 NO ACTION TAKEN (MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE)
2611/02/2012 E-FILED MOTION
2711/13/2012 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
2811/20/2012 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)
2911/20/2012 ARGUED: NONE - Waived
3012/24/2012 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
3112/24/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
3201/02/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
3301/15/2013 MANDATE
3401/17/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/16/2014