State v. Baesler | |||||||
| 20120295 |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v. Lowell Lee Baesler, Defendant and Appellant | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Morton County
Judge Gail Hagerty | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | DRUGS/CONTRABAND | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 11/2012 Argument: 11/20/2012 Waived | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2012 ND 262 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
823 N.W.2d 786
| ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: Did the trial court err when it denied Baesler's Motion to Suppress? Appellee's Statement of the Issues: Whether the Trial Court erred in Denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence. | ||||||
 Add Docket 20120295 RSS
| |||||||
| 1 | 07/20/2012 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/19/2012 | ||
| 2 | 07/20/2012 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 07/19/2012 | ||
| 3 | 07/20/2012 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Sandstrom, Dale V. | ||
| 4 | 07/20/2012 | This case is consolidated w/20120296. Make all docket entries, except ROA, DIS, & MAN | ||
| 5 | 07/20/2012 | codes, in this case | ||
| 6 | 07/23/2012 | Acknowledgment of Order for Transcript from Ronda Colby | ||
| 7 | 08/13/2012 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED 6/29/12 & 7/5/12 & C.O.S. | ||
| 8 | 08/13/2012 | DISK-TRA (6/29/12 & 7/5/12) E-MAILED | ||
| 9 | 08/15/2012 | ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 08/14/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-63) | ||
| 10 | 08/17/2012 | AMENDED ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 08/16/2012 (ENTRY NOS.1-49, 51-64) (ENTRY NO. 50 deleted) | ||
| 11 | 09/21/2012 | APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 12 | 09/21/2012 | E-FILED BRIEF | ||
| 13 | 09/21/2012 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 14 | 09/21/2012 | E-FILED APPENDIX | ||
| 15 | 09/24/2012 | Received surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21508) | ||
| 16 | 09/25/2012 | Rec'd 7 copies of ATB from CSD | ||
| 17 | 09/25/2012 | Rec'd 6 copies of ATA from CSD | ||
| 18 | 10/19/2012 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 19 | 10/19/2012 | DISK - aeb (CD-ROM) | ||
| 20 | 10/23/2012 | SITTING WITH THE COURT: McClintock, Jr., John C. | ||
| 21 | 11/02/2012 | MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT | ||
| 22 | 11/02/2012 | E-FILED MOTION | ||
| 23 | 11/02/2012 | MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE | ||
| 24 | 11/13/2012 | NO ACTION TAKEN (MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT) | ||
| 25 | 11/13/2012 | NO ACTION TAKEN (MOTION TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE) | ||
| 26 | 11/02/2012 | E-FILED MOTION | ||
| 27 | 11/13/2012 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | ||
| 28 | 11/20/2012 | APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a) | ||
| 29 | 11/20/2012 | ARGUED: NONE - Waived | ||
| 30 | 12/24/2012 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP. | ||
| 31 | 12/24/2012 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam | ||
| 32 | 01/02/2013 | Judgment Sent to Parties | ||
| 33 | 01/15/2013 | MANDATE | ||
| 34 | 01/17/2013 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |