Interest of Voisine

20120325 In the Interest of Raymond J. Voisine
--------------
Jonathan Byers, Special Assistant
State's Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
Raymond J. Voisine, Respondent and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Sheridan County
Judge Sonna M. Anderson
Nature of Action: Civil Commit of Sexual Predator
Counsel:
Appellant: Kent M. Morrow
Appellee: Jonathan R. Byers , Spec. Asst. State's Atty.
Term: 12/2012   Argument: 12/04/2012  11:00am
ND cite: 2012 ND 250
NW cite: 823 N.W.2d 786

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Did the State present clear and convincing evidence to support the continued commitment of Raymond J. Voisine?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Did the State present clear and convincing evidence to support the continued commitment of Raymond Voisine as a sexually dangerous individual?

Add Docket 20120325 RSS Add Docket 20120325 RSS

Docket entries:
108/16/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 08/07/2012
208/16/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 08/07/2012
308/28/2012 TRANSCRIPT DATED FEBRUARY 22, 2012, & C.O.S.
408/29/2012 DISK-TRA (2/22/12) E-MAILED
509/14/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED September 13, 2012 (ENTRY NOS. 1-96)
609/28/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
709/28/2012 E-FILED MOTION
809/28/2012 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 11/06/2012
911/05/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF
1011/05/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1111/05/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1211/05/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
1311/06/2012 Received $25 e-filing surcharge for ATB (Receipt #21565)
1411/08/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
1511/08/2012 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
1611/13/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF
1711/13/2012 DISK (e-mailed)
1811/20/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1911/21/2012 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLANT
2011/21/2012 E-FILED MOTION
2111/21/2012 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Denied
2212/04/2012 APPEARANCES: Kent Morrow/Jonathan Byers
2312/04/2012 ARGUED: Morrow/Byers
2412/04/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2512/18/2012 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2612/18/2012 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
2712/19/2012 Judgment E-Mailed to Parties
2801/25/2013 MANDATE
2902/04/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 04/23/2014