Lario Oil & Gas Company v. EOG Resources, Inc.

20120349 Lario Oil & Gas Company,
a foreign corporation,
Gene F. Lang & Co., a
foreign corporation, Plaintiffs
-------------------------
Lario Oil & Gas Company,
a foreign corporation, Appellee
v.
EOG Resources, Inc.,
a foreign corporation, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Northwest Judicial District, Mountrail County
Judge Richard L. Hagar
Nature of Action: Real Property
Counsel:
Appellant: Lawrence Bender
Appellant: Amy Lynn De Kok
Appellee: Charles L. Neff
Appellant: Michael D. Schoepf
Term: 01/2013   Argument: 01/15/2013  9:30am
ND cite: 2013 ND 98
NW cite: 832 N.W.2d 049

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I.Whether the district court erred in concluding that oil and gas leases for Lots 2 and 3 in Section 31, Township 157 North, Range 91 West, Mountrail County, North Dakota, did not include those portions of the lots that lie under White Lake?
II.Whether the district court erred in concluding that a "Mother Hubbard" or "cover-all" clause in an oil and gas lease cannot be applied to bring acreage into an oil and gas lease that was omitted because of a mistake as to the ownership of the acreage?

Add Docket 20120349 RSS Add Docket 20120349 RSS

Docket entries:
109/19/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/14/2012
209/24/2012 Recv'd $125 filing fee receipt # 21509
310/09/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 10/09/12 (ENTRY NOS.1-30)
410/24/2012 APPELLANT BRIEF & ADDENDUM
510/24/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
610/24/2012 APPELLANT APPENDIX
710/24/2012 E-FILED APPENDIX
810/25/2012 Received $38.50 e-filing surcharge for ATB & ATA (Receipt #21560)
910/29/2012 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
1010/29/2012 Received 6 copies of ATA from Central Duplicating
1111/20/2012 APPELLEE BRIEF (Lario Oil & Gas)
1211/20/2012 DISK(emailed)
1312/10/2012 Received non-substantive correction to RYB
1412/07/2012 REPLY BRIEF
1512/07/2012 E-FILED BRIEF
1612/12/2012 Received 7 copies of RYB from CSD
1712/18/2012 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1801/15/2013 APPEARANCES: Amy L. De Kok; Michael D. Schoepf; Charles L. Neff
1901/15/2013 ARGUED: Michael D. Schoepf; Charles L. Neff
2001/15/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2106/19/2013 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
2206/19/2013 SPLIT OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John
2306/19/2013 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
2406/20/2013 Corrected Opinion Pages 1 and 6
2506/20/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
2607/25/2013 MANDATE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/30/2014