State v. Dieterle | |||||||
20120372 |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v. Angela Louise Dieterle, Defendant and Appellant | ||||||
Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Sheridan County
Judge Sonna M. Anderson | ||||||
Nature of Action: | Assault | ||||||
Counsel: |
| ||||||
Term: | 05/2013  Argument: 05/15/2013 | ||||||
ND cite: | 2013 ND 130 | ||||||
NW cite: |
833 N.W.2d 473
Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format | ||||||
| |||||||
Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: 1. Whether the lower court erred by allowing the Prosecutor to introduce evidence under N.D.R.Ev. 404(b) during his cross-examination of the Defendant when there was not adequate notice of 404(b) evidence and where the Court did not subject that evidence to scrutiny under N.D.R.Ev. 403 or the appropriate three-pronged analysis. | ||||||
![]() |
1 | 10/08/2012 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 10/02/2012 | |
2 | 10/08/2012 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 10/02/2012 | |
3 | 10/08/2012 Amended Notice of Appeal filed 10-3-12 | |
4 | 10/08/2012 Amended Order for Transcript filed 10-3-12 | |
5 | 10/08/2012 Assignment of Mark Blumer as counsel for Appellant | |
6 | 11/21/2012 TRANSCRIPTS DATED May 9, 2012; May 25, 2012 & redaction key; & October 1, 2012 (3 vols.) & C.O.S. | |
7 | 11/21/2012 DISK - tra (5/9/12; 5/25/12 and redaction key; & 10/1/12) (e-mailed) | |
8 | 11/13/2012 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 11/9/12 (ENTRY NOS.1-116) (44-49 deleted, 54-55 missing, 89-90 not | |
9 | 12/24/2012 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
10 | 12/24/2012 E-FILED MOTION | |
11 | 12/24/2012 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 01/14/2013 | |
12 | 12/31/2012 Substitution of Counsel by Jess N. Lange as attorney for appellant | |
13 | 01/04/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
14 | 01/04/2013 E-FILED MOTION | |
15 | 01/04/2013 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 01/30/2013 | |
16 | 01/29/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF | |
17 | 01/29/2013 E-FILED MOTION | |
18 | 01/29/2013 ACTION BY Acting Chief Justice. Granted: 04/01/2013 | |
19 | 02/08/2013 Stipulation Regarding Record (e-filed) | |
20 | 03/25/2013 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPTS (FEBRUARY 22, 2012 & DECEMBER 1, 2012) | |
21 | 03/28/2013 TRANSCRIPTS DATED December 1, 2011, and redaction key; February 22, 2012; & C.O.S. | |
22 | 03/28/2013 DISK - transcripts dated December 1, 2011, and redaction key; and February 22, 2012 (e-mailed) | |
23 | 04/01/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF | |
24 | 04/01/2013 E-FILED BRIEF | |
25 | 04/01/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
26 | 04/01/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX | |
27 | 04/11/2013 Received 7 copies of the ATB & 6 copies of the ATA from Central Duplicating | |
28 | 04/11/2013 Received the $25 surcharge for the ATB (Receipt 21792) | |
29 | 04/19/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
30 | 04/19/2013 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE | |
31 | 04/19/2013 E-FILED MOTION | |
32 | 05/01/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF | |
33 | 05/01/2013 DISK of AEB (e-mailed) | |
34 | 05/03/2013 MOTION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE | |
35 | 05/03/2013 E-FILED MOTION | |
36 | 05/03/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Waiver of argument by Appellee). Granted | |
37 | 05/03/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (denied resetting argument). Denied | |
38 | 05/10/2013 REPLY BRIEF | |
39 | 05/10/2013 E-FILED BRIEF | |
40 | 05/15/2013 APPEARANCES: Jesse Lange and the Appellant/State waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f) | |
41 | 05/15/2013 ARGUED: Lange | |
42 | 05/15/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
43 | 07/18/2013 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | |
44 | 07/18/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Crothers, Daniel John | |
45 | 07/18/2013 CONCUR IN THE RESULT: Sandstrom, Dale V.: CONCUR | |
46 | 07/19/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties | |
47 | 08/21/2013 MANDATE | |
48 | 08/26/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE |