State v. Varnson

20130041 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Kyle Jordan Varnson, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Judge Debbie Gordon Kleven
Nature of Action: Dui/Dus
Counsel:
Appellant: David C. Thompson
Appellee: Faye A. Jasmer , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 06/2013   Argument: 06/17/2013  Waived
ND cite: 2013 ND 114
NW cite: 837 N.W.2d 159


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Because University of North Dakota Police Officer Daniel Weigel did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle driven by defendant Kyle Jordan Varnson -- the defendant's conviction in this case for driving under the influence was violative of the Fourth (and Fourteenth) Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I,  8, of the North Dakota Constitution.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether reasonable, articulable suspicion existed to justify the traffic stop initiated by Officer Weigel of the University of North Dakota Police Department.

Add Docket 20130041 RSS Add Docket 20130041 RSS

Docket entries:
102/06/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 02/06/2013
203/18/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
303/18/2013 E-FILED MOTION
403/18/2013 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 04/08/2013
503/08/2013 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MARCH 7, 2013 (ENTRY NOS.1-30 & 32-39) sent by U.S.Mail (31-CD Rom)
603/11/2013 REC'D VIA U.S. MAIL EXHIBIT (ENTRY NO. 31-CD ROM)
703/26/2013 Change of counsel to Haley Wamstad for Appellee
804/17/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
904/17/2013 E-FILED MOTION
1004/17/2013 ACTION BY ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted: 04/30/2013
1104/30/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF (PDF)
1204/30/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
1304/30/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1404/30/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
1505/09/2013 Change of counsel back to Faye Jasmer
1605/03/2013 TRANSCRIPTS DATED OCTOBER 18, 2012 & JANUARY 11, 2013 & C.O.S.
1705/03/2013 DISK-Transcripts dated October 18, 2012 and January 11, 2013 (e-mailed)
1805/10/2013 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 05/01/2013
1905/14/2013 We rec'd 7 copies ATB & 6 copies ATA from Central Duplicating
2005/22/2013 Rec'd $25 surcharge for the ATB (receipt #21868)
2105/16/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2205/29/2013 received Consent to Appearance of Andrew C. Eyre
2305/29/2013 Request to Waive Oral Argument by Appellee
2405/29/2013 E-FILED MOTION
2505/29/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF
2605/29/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
2705/31/2013 received 7 copies of AEB from CSD
2805/31/2013 received $25 surcharge for AEB
2905/31/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Request to Waive Oral Argument by Appellee). Granted
3005/31/2013 S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY
3106/17/2013 APPEARANCES: Waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(2) for the AT and for AE under N.D.R.App.P. 34(f)
3206/17/2013 ARGUED: Waived
3306/17/2013 REPLY BRIEF (PDF)
3406/17/2013 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
3507/18/2013 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
3607/18/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam
3707/22/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
3808/16/2013 MANDATE
3908/22/2013 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/21/2014