State v. Otto

20130096 State of North Dakota Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Wayne James Otto Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Sonna M. Anderson
Nature of Action: Drugs/Contraband
Counsel:
Appellant: Thomas John Glass
Appellee: Dawn Marie Deitz , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 10/2013   Argument: 10/16/2013  10:00am
ND cite: 2013 ND 239
NW cite: 840 N.W.2d 589

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. The Defendant has the right to appeal to the Supreme Court.
2. Whether law enforcement had violated the Defendant's fourth amendment rights and illegally searched his camper/residence.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the District Court erred as a matter of law in denying the Appellant's Motion to Suppress.

Add Docket 20130096 RSS Add Docket 20130096 RSS

Docket entries:
104/02/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 04/02/2013
204/02/2013 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 04/02/2013
304/10/2013 Second Notice of Appeal (filed by Appellant, Wayne J. Otto)
405/02/2013 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED MAY 1, 2013 (ENTRY NOS.1-116)
505/22/2013 TRANSCRIPTS DATED DECEMBER 21, 2012 AND MARCH 7, 2013 & C.O.S.
605/22/2013 DISK-Transcripts dated December 21, 2012 & March 7, 2013 (e-mailed)
706/28/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
806/28/2013 E-FILED MOTION
906/28/2013 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 07/31/2013
1007/31/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF
1107/31/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
1207/31/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1307/31/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
1408/01/2013 Rcv'd $25 surcharge for ATB (receipt #21996)
1508/02/2013 Rcv'd non substantive correction to ATA (title pg & toc)
1608/07/2013 Rcv'd C.O.S. on corrected ATA
1708/08/2013 Rcv'd 7 copies of ATB & 6 copies of ATA from CSD
1808/29/2013 Rule 24 N.D.R.App.P. supplemental statement by indigent defendant (scanned)
1908/29/2013 DISK NONCOMPLIANCE
2009/09/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF
2109/09/2013 DISK(AEB)(e-mailed)
2209/10/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF
2309/10/2013 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 09/09/2013
2409/13/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2509/25/2013 AMENDED NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2610/16/2013 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE
2710/16/2013 E-FILED MOTION
2810/16/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. Denied
2910/16/2013 APPEARANCES: Appellant waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(e); Dawn M. Deitz
3010/16/2013 ARGUED: Appellant waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(e); Dawn M. Deitz
3110/16/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
3212/19/2013 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
3312/19/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
3412/19/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
3501/17/2014 MANDATE
3611/21/2014 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/18/2014