Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WSI

20130185 Industrial Contractors, Inc., Appellant
v.
North Dakota Workforce Safety and Insurance, Appellee
and
David Kraft, Respondent

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, McLean County
Judge Gail Hagerty
Nature of Action: Workers Compensation
Counsel:
Appellant: Lawrence E. King
Appellee: Mitchell D. Armstrong , Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen.
Term: 11/2013   Argument: 11/27/2013  9:00am
ND cite: 2013 ND 226
NW cite: 841 N.W.2d 001

Listen to recording of oral argument in MP3 format

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the claimant has established that his left elbow condition arises out of and was caused by an employment injury?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. Whether the administrative law judge could reasonably conclude David Kraft suffered a compensable injury to his left elbow.

Add Docket 20130185 RSS Add Docket 20130185 RSS

Docket entries:
106/19/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/18/2013
206/19/2013 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
306/21/2013 DISK-TRA (Administrative Agency Hearing Dated 08/27/12) e-mailed
407/23/2013 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
507/23/2013 E-FILED MOTION
607/23/2013 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted: 08/20/2013
707/26/2013 ELEC. ROA DATED July 25, 2013(ENTRY NOS.1-12,14-24 & 27-35) Items not sent:(13,25 & 26)
808/20/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF
908/20/2013 E-FILED BRIEF
1008/20/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1108/20/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
1208/21/2013 Rec'd $25 e-file surcharge for the atb (receipt #22031)
1308/27/2013 Rec'd non-substantive corrections to ATA
1408/30/2013 Rec'd 7 copies of ATB & 6 copies of ATA
1509/13/2013 Rec'd amended COS of ATB & ATA on Mr. Kraft from Mr. King's ofc.
1609/16/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF (PDF)
1709/16/2013 E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)
1809/16/2013 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1909/16/2013 E-FILED APPENDIX
2009/17/2013 Rec'd the $25 e-file surcharge for the AEB (receipt #22225)
2109/20/2013 We rec'd AEB & ATA from Central Duplicating
2210/22/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
2310/28/2013 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Narum, Daniel D.
2411/27/2013 APPEARANCES: Lawrence E. King; Mitchell D. Armstrong
2511/27/2013 ARGUED: Lawrence E. King; Mitchell D. Armstrong
2611/27/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2712/16/2013 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED BY SUMMARY DISP.
2812/16/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Per Curiam,
2912/17/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
3001/08/2014 MANDATE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/26/2014