State v. One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile

20130186 State of North Dakota, Appellee and Plaintiff
v.
One 2002 Dodge Intrepid Automobile, Defendant
--------------------
Kawo Otis Flah, Interested Party and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Bruce A. Romanick
Nature of Action: Other (Civil)
Counsel:
Appellant: Pro se
Appellee: Dawn Marie Deitz , Asst. State's Attorney
Term: 11/2013   Argument: 11/07/2013  10:00am
ND cite: 2013 ND 234
NW cite: 841 N.W.2d 239


Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the lower court erroneously determined that appellant's automobile be forfeited, when appellant was not given prior notice of the date and time of the forfeiture hearing and whether the lower court violated appellant's right to not be deprived of property without due process of law.

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
Whether the Appellant was provided proper notice of the forfeiture and subsequent notice of the forfeiture hearing.

Add Docket 20130186 RSS Add Docket 20130186 RSS

Docket entries:
106/20/2013 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/19/2013
206/20/2013 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 06/19/2013
307/16/2013 ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED July 15, 2013 (ENTRY NOS. 1 -22)
407/26/2013 Petition to Waive Filing Fee on Appeal
507/29/2013 ACTION BY CLERK. Granted
607/29/2013 Filing Fee waived
708/02/2013 TRANSCRIPT DATED May 9, 2013 & C.O.S.
808/02/2013 DISK - TRA dated May 9, 2013 (e-mailed)
909/09/2013 APPELLANT BRIEF (handwritten)
1009/09/2013 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1109/09/2013 DISK NONCOMPLIANCE (ATB)(scanned)
1210/07/2013 APPELLEE BRIEF
1310/07/2013 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1410/07/2013 DISK(AEB)(e-mailed)
1510/14/2013 REQUEST TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT BY APPELLEE
1610/21/2013 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
1710/23/2013 Warden will not transport Kawo Flah for Oral Arg and thus he will not argue
1810/23/2013 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Request to waive oral argument by Appellee). Denied
1911/07/2013 APPEARANCES: Appellant waived under N.D.R.App.P. 34(e); Dawn M. Deitz
2011/07/2013 ARGUED: Dawn M. Deitz
2111/07/2013 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
2212/19/2013 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
2312/19/2013 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning
2412/13/2013 COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLANT
2512/20/2013 Judgment Sent to Parties
2601/16/2014 MANDATE
2701/21/2014 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/27/2014