Novak v. Novak
Jacque S. Olson, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Richard R. Novak, Defendant and Appellant
Judge Joel D. Medd
| Appellant: | Pearson Christensen & Clapp, PLLP | |
| Appellee: | Olson, Juntunen & Sandberg, Ltd. |
Add Docket 880355 RSS
Novak v. Novak | |||||||
| 880355 |
Jacque S. Novak, now known as
Jacque S. Olson, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Richard R. Novak, Defendant and Appellant | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
Northeast Central Judicial District,
Grand Forks County
Judge Joel D. Medd | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Child Cust & Support (Div.\other) | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 04/1989 Argument: 04/26/1989 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
441 N.W.2d 656
| ||||||
|
Add Docket 880355 RSS
| |||||||
| 1 | 12/01/1988 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 11/30/1988 | ||
| 2 | 12/14/1988 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL & Ack. Tran. Order: 01/19/1989 | ||
| 3 | 01/06/1989 | MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL, Brief in | ||
| 4 | 01/06/1989 | Support & Appendix to Brief in Support | ||
| 5 | 01/10/1989 | RECORD ON APPEAL and Exhibits | ||
| 6 | 01/10/1989 | TRANSCRIPT commencing October 13, 1988 | ||
| 7 | 01/11/1989 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (ON Mot /Stay). DENIED | ||
| 8 | 01/16/1989 | Apppellee's Brief in Opposition of Motion for Stay | ||
| 9 | 01/16/1989 | Pending Appeal & Affidavit of Jacque Olson (no further | ||
| 10 | 01/16/1989 | action is contemplated since Court denied Motion for Stay) | ||
| 11 | 01/17/1989 | MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF 01-11-89 ACTION | ||
| 12 | 01/18/1989 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. DENIED | ||
| 13 | 01/18/1989 | The Court voted to adhere to their previous action of 1-11-89 | ||
| 14 | 02/20/1989 | APPELLANT BRIEF with attached Addendum (Appendix?) | ||
| 15 | 02/23/1989 | APPENDIX FILED w/MOTION FOR STAY WILL SERVE AS THE APPENDIX | ||
| 16 | 02/23/1989 | FOR ARGUMENT ON THE MERITS (per Ron Fischer) | ||
| 17 | 03/17/1989 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 18 | 03/29/1989 | MOTION FOR POSTPONEMENT OF ORAL ARGUMENT. RESPDUE: 04/03/1989 | ||
| 19 | 03/30/1989 | RESPONSE FILED (Use only after RSPDUE) | ||
| 20 | 03/31/1989 | REPLY BRIEF with attached Addendum | ||
| 21 | 04/05/1989 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (mot/postpone o.a.). DENIED | ||
| 22 | 04/10/1989 | Letter dated April 7 from P. Fisher stating his intention | ||
| 23 | 04/10/1989 | to file a motion to postpone argument pursuant to Rule 6.1 | ||
| 24 | 04/10/1989 | of the ND Rules of Civil Procedure | ||
| 25 | 04/14/1989 | Letter dated April 12 from D. Christensen resisting any | ||
| 26 | 04/14/1989 | motion made pursuant to Rule 6.1 | ||
| 27 | 04/20/1989 | MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE PURSUANT TO RULE 6.1 | ||
| 28 | 04/20/1989 | ND Rules of Civil Procedure | ||
| 29 | 04/19/1989 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. DENIED | ||
| 30 | 04/19/1989 | The Court denied the motion prior to receiving it | ||
| 31 | 04/26/1989 | APPEARANCES: Douglas A. Christensen; Patrick W. Fisher | ||
| 32 | 04/26/1989 | ARGUED: Christensen; Fisher (Vol. R. pg. | ||
| 33 | 06/06/1989 | DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED | ||
| 34 | 06/06/1989 | SPLIT OPINION: Meschke, Herbert L. | ||
| 35 | 06/06/1989 | CONCURRING SPECIALLY: VandeWalle, Gerald: CONCUR | ||
| 36 | 06/06/1989 | COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLEE | ||
| 37 | 07/11/1989 | MANDATE | ||
| 38 | 04/12/2001 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |