Klem v. Greenwood

890188 Ernest E. Klem, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Mark L. Greenwood and
Greenwood, Greenwood
& Greenwood, P.C., Defendants and Appellees

Appeal from: District Court, Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Judge William M. Beede
Nature of Action: Malpractice
Counsel:
Appellant: Pro se
Appellee: Zuger Kirmis & Smith
Term: 12/1989   Argument: 12/08/1989  11:00AM
NW cite: 450 N.W.2d 738

Add Docket 890188 RSS Add Docket 890188 RSS

Docket entries:
106/15/1989 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/14/1989
207/11/1989 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF & Brief in Sup.
307/11/1989 ACTION BY CLERK. GRANTED: 08/23/1989
407/13/1989 RECORD ON APPEAL
508/21/1989 APPELLANT BRIEF
608/21/1989 APPELLANT APPENDIX
708/28/1989 Letter from James S. Hill indicating Appellant's Brief was
808/28/1989 served on his client on August 23--Appellee's Brief
908/28/1989 due 09/25/89 per Lu
1009/21/1989 APPELLEE BRIEF
1109/21/1989 APPELLEE APPENDIX
1210/05/1989 MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (letter from Ernest
1310/05/1989 Klem dated 10-4-89)
1410/05/1989 ACTION BY CLERK. GRANTED: 10/17/1989
1510/16/1989 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT (Blue covers)
1612/08/1989 APPEARANCES: Ernest E. Klem, pro se; James S. Hill
1712/08/1989 ARGUED: Klem, pro se; Hill
1812/08/1989 Klem's Supreme Court Exhibit #1 was offered during oral
1912/08/1989 argument, objected to by Mr. Hill, Court received exhibit
2012/08/1989 to determine relevancy at a later date (Vol. R, pg. 117)
2112/14/1989 Letter dated December 13, 1989, with attached tran. page
2201/18/1990 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
2301/18/1990 SPLIT OPINION: Erickstad, Ralph J.
2401/18/1990 (Concurring): Meschke, Herbert L.: CONCUR
2501/18/1990 COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLANT
2601/31/1990 PETITION FOR REHEARING
2703/01/1990 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (pet/rehearing). DENIED
2803/09/1990 MANDATE
2904/17/2002 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/01/2014