Klem v. Greenwood
v.
Mark L. Greenwood and
Greenwood, Greenwood
& Greenwood, P.C., Defendants and Appellees
Judge William M. Beede
| Appellant: | Pro se | |
| Appellee: | Zuger Kirmis & Smith |
Add Docket 890188 RSS
Klem v. Greenwood | |||||||
| 890188 |
Ernest E. Klem, Plaintiff and Appellant
v. Mark L. Greenwood and Greenwood, Greenwood & Greenwood, P.C., Defendants and Appellees | ||||||
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
Southwest Judicial District,
Stark County
Judge William M. Beede | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Malpractice | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 12/1989 Argument: 12/08/1989 11:00AM | ||||||
| NW cite: |
450 N.W.2d 738
| ||||||
|
Add Docket 890188 RSS
| |||||||
| 1 | 06/15/1989 | NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/14/1989 | ||
| 2 | 07/11/1989 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF & Brief in Sup. | ||
| 3 | 07/11/1989 | ACTION BY CLERK. GRANTED: 08/23/1989 | ||
| 4 | 07/13/1989 | RECORD ON APPEAL | ||
| 5 | 08/21/1989 | APPELLANT BRIEF | ||
| 6 | 08/21/1989 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | ||
| 7 | 08/28/1989 | Letter from James S. Hill indicating Appellant's Brief was | ||
| 8 | 08/28/1989 | served on his client on August 23--Appellee's Brief | ||
| 9 | 08/28/1989 | due 09/25/89 per Lu | ||
| 10 | 09/21/1989 | APPELLEE BRIEF | ||
| 11 | 09/21/1989 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | ||
| 12 | 10/05/1989 | MOT. EXT/TIME REPLY BRIEF (letter from Ernest | ||
| 13 | 10/05/1989 | Klem dated 10-4-89) | ||
| 14 | 10/05/1989 | ACTION BY CLERK. GRANTED: 10/17/1989 | ||
| 15 | 10/16/1989 | REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT (Blue covers) | ||
| 16 | 12/08/1989 | APPEARANCES: Ernest E. Klem, pro se; James S. Hill | ||
| 17 | 12/08/1989 | ARGUED: Klem, pro se; Hill | ||
| 18 | 12/08/1989 | Klem's Supreme Court Exhibit #1 was offered during oral | ||
| 19 | 12/08/1989 | argument, objected to by Mr. Hill, Court received exhibit | ||
| 20 | 12/08/1989 | to determine relevancy at a later date (Vol. R, pg. 117) | ||
| 21 | 12/14/1989 | Letter dated December 13, 1989, with attached tran. page | ||
| 22 | 01/18/1990 | DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED | ||
| 23 | 01/18/1990 | SPLIT OPINION: Erickstad, Ralph J. | ||
| 24 | 01/18/1990 | (Concurring): Meschke, Herbert L.: CONCUR | ||
| 25 | 01/18/1990 | COSTS ON APPEAL TAXED IN FAVOR OF APPELLANT | ||
| 26 | 01/31/1990 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | ||
| 27 | 03/01/1990 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (pet/rehearing). DENIED | ||
| 28 | 03/09/1990 | MANDATE | ||
| 29 | 04/17/2002 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |