Plante v. Columbia Paints
|
| 920222 |
Parnel Pierre Plante, Mary
Elizabeth Plante, husband and
wife, and Ashley Plante, a
minor, and Mark S. Sandness,
Sheila M. Sandness, Heather N.
Sandness, a minor, and
Brea M. Sandness, a minor, Plaintiffs and Appellees
v.
Columbia Paints, an Idaho
corporation, Defendant and Appellee
and
The Hartford Accident and
Indemnity Company, an insurance
company, Defendant and Appellant
|
| Appeal from: |
District Court,
South Central Judicial District,
Burleigh County
Judge Dennis A. Schneider |
|
Nature of Action: |
Insurance
|
| Counsel: |
|
| Term: |
11/1992 Argument: 11/17/1992 02:30pm
|
| NW cite: |
494 N.W.2d 140
|
|
|
|
 Add Docket 920222 RSS
|
| 1 | | 07/27/1992 | |
NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/23/1992 |
| 2 | | 07/27/1992 | |
ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT |
| 3 | | 07/28/1992 | |
TRANSCRIPT DATED 3-16-92 |
| 4 | | 08/05/1992 | |
AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD STANDING OF CHARLES T. HVASS, JR. |
| 5 | | 08/13/1992 | |
Notice of Appearance of Sara B. Gullickson. |
| 6 | | 08/17/1992 | |
Letter from Malcolm Brown stating that his client, Columbia |
| 7 | | 08/17/1992 | |
Paints did not appeal and will respond as Appellee. |
| 8 | | 08/24/1992 | |
RECORD ON APPEAL |
| 9 | | 08/28/1992 | |
MOTION TO STRIKE OR FOR SUBSTITUTION OR. RESPDUE: 09/09/1992 |
| 10 | | 08/28/1992 | |
REALIGNMENT OF PARTIES FILED BY HARTFORD; BRIEF IN SUPPORT |
| 11 | | 08/28/1992 | |
(Response due by 4 p.m.) |
| 12 | | 09/01/1992 | |
PLANTES' RETURN TO HARTFORD'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR FOR SUB- |
| 13 | | 09/01/1992 | |
STITUTION OR REALIGNMENT OF PARTIES |
| 14 | | 09/05/1992 | |
APPELLANT BRIEF |
| 15 | | 09/05/1992 | |
APPELLANT APPENDIX (missing table of contents) |
| 16 | | 09/09/1992 | |
COLUMBIA PAINT'S RETURN TO HARTFORD'S MOTION TO STRIKE |
| 17 | | 09/10/1992 | |
Corrected cover pages for ATB/APP & page 26. Inserted. |
| 18 | | 09/10/1992 | |
Table of Contents for Appendix. Inserted. |
| 19 | | 09/16/1992 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Mot/Strike). DENIED |
| 20 | | 09/16/1992 | |
(Mot/Strike or Substitution or Realignment of Parties is |
| 21 | | 09/16/1992 | |
denied without prejudice to the allocation of time for |
| 22 | | 09/16/1992 | |
oral arguments, treating Columbia Paints as an Appellee) |
| 23 | | 10/01/1992 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF (Parnell Pierre Plante, |
| 24 | | 10/01/1992 | |
Mary Elizabeth Plante and Ashley Plante) |
| 25 | | 10/01/1992 | |
Appendix (attached to AEB of Parnell Pierre Plante, et al.) |
| 26 | | 10/05/1992 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF (SANDNESS) (NEED ADDITIONAL BRIEF) |
| 27 | | 10/06/1992 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF (Columbia Paints) |
| 28 | | 10/07/1992 | |
APPELLEE BRIEF - SANDNESS (NOTE: additional copy) |
| 29 | | 10/14/1992 | |
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT APPENDIX (w/attachments). RESPDUE: 10/26/1992 |
| 30 | | 10/14/1992 | |
(Response due by 9 a.m.) |
| 31 | | 10/15/1992 | |
REPLY BRIEF |
| 32 | | 10/15/1992 | |
SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX |
| 33 | | 10/19/1992 | |
AFFIDAVITS OF GOOD STANDING (2) OF DANIEL J. CONNOLLY AND |
| 34 | | 10/19/1992 | |
THOMAS S. SCHROEDER |
| 35 | | 10/19/1992 | |
PLANTE'S RETURN TO HARTFORD'S MOT TO SUPPLEMENT |
| 36 | | 10/19/1992 | |
APPENDIX AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT |
| 37 | | 10/22/1992 | |
Columbia Paint's Response to AE Mot to Supplement Appendix |
| 38 | | 10/26/1992 | |
Affidavit of Good Standing of Scott W. Johnson |
| 39 | | 10/28/1992 | |
ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Mot/Supp.Append). DENIED |
| 40 | | 10/28/1992 | |
Response of Sandness (no action required-already acted on) |
| 41 | | 11/17/1992 | |
APPEARANCES: Sara B. Gullickson; Malcolm H. Brown; Scott W. |
| 42 | | 11/17/1992 | |
Johnson; David L. Peterson; A. William Lucas |
| 43 | | 11/17/1992 | |
ARGUED: Gullickson; Brown (Vol. T, pg. 50) |
| 44 | | 12/22/1992 | |
DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED |
| 45 | | 12/22/1992 | |
UNANIMOUS OPINION: JOHNSON |
| 46 | | 12/22/1992 | |
Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant |
| 47 | | 01/25/1993 | |
MANDATE |
| 48 | | 04/16/2001 | |
EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |