van Oosting v. van Oosting

940003 Shirley van Oosting, Plaintiff, Appellant and
Cross-Appellee
v.
William B. van Oosting, Defendant, Appellee and
Cross-Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge William F. Hodny
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Schulz Geiermann & Bergeson Law Offices, P.C.
Appellee: Mahoney & Mahoney
Term: 06/1994   Argument: 06/13/1994  
NW cite: 521 N.W.2d 093

Add Docket 940003 RSS Add Docket 940003 RSS

Docket entries:
101/04/1994 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/03/1994
201/04/1994 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT (Joyce O. Harnden)
301/04/1994 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL (court reporter): 02/22/1994
401/20/1994 NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL (William B. van Oosting)
502/15/1994 RECORD ON APPEAL & Exhibits (with exception of Exhs. P-4,
602/15/1994 P-6, D-26, D-43, and D-44)
702/16/1994 TRANSCRIPT DATED 10-5-93; 10-6-93; 10-12-93; & 11-4-93 (4 Volumes)
803/25/1994 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF
903/25/1994 ACTION BY CLERK. GRANTED: 04/11/1994
1004/11/1994 APPELLANT BRIEF
1104/11/1994 APPELLANT APPENDIX (missing NOA)
1204/14/1994 NOA and N/Cross appeal (inserted)
1305/10/1994 APPELLEE BRIEF
1406/13/1994 APPEARANCES: Timothy D. Lervick; Ann C. Mahoney
1506/13/1994 ARGUED: Lervick; Mahoney (Vol. U, pg. 15)
1606/23/1994 Stipulation to Correct Trial Court Record & Docket with
1706/23/1994 copy of Defendant's proposed Property Division & Spousal
1806/23/1994 Support (These were numbered 44A & 44B and made a part of the ROA)
1909/07/1994 DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED): AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT
2009/07/1994 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
2109/07/1994 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
2209/29/1994 MANDATE
2304/02/2001 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/02/2014