Wald v. Wald

960031 Marion E. Wald, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Roger J. Wald, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, South Central Judicial District, Burleigh County
Judge Dennis A. Schneider
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Vogel Law Firm
Appellee: #Schmitz & Schmidt
Term: 09/1996   Argument: 09/25/1996  2:45pm
NW cite: 556 N.W.2d 291

Add Docket 960031 RSS Add Docket 960031 RSS

Docket entries:
101/30/1996 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 01/26/1996
201/30/1996 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT (Sandie Ehrmantraut): 01/26/1996
302/15/1996 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL (Sandie Ehrmantraut): 03/16/1996
403/15/1996 MOTION EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT
503/15/1996 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. GRANTED: 03/29/1996
603/28/1996 TRANSCRIPT DATED April 18 and 19, 1995
705/02/1996 RECORD ON APPEAL w/ separates
805/08/1996 MOT. EXT/TIME ATB & AFF/SUPPORT
905/08/1996 ACTION BY CLERK. GRANTED: 05/15/1996
1005/16/1996 APPELLANT BRIEF
1105/16/1996 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1206/12/1996 APPELLEE BRIEF
1309/25/1996 APPEARANCES: Carol Ronning Kapsner; Orell D. Schmitz and
1409/25/1996 Roger J. Wald, Appellee
1509/25/1996 ARGUED: Kapsner; Schmitz (Vol. V, pg. 14)
1612/04/1996 DISPOSITION (REMANDED): AFFIRMED/PT, REVERSED/PT
1712/04/1996 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
1812/04/1996 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
1912/05/1996 ORDER/JUDGMENT MAILED TO PARTIES
2012/30/1996 MANDATE
2106/09/2004 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/22/2014