Kautzman v. Kautzman
n/k/a Rachel M. Dietz, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Robert A. Kautzman, Defendant and Appellant
Judge Norman J. Backes
| Appellant: | Garaas Law Firm | |
| Appellee: | Vogel Law Firm | |
| Appellant: | Johnson, Ramstad & Mottinger, PLLP |
I. Did the trial court make a proper determination of the value of Kautzman Construction, Inc., and then properly redetermine the property distribution?
II. Did the trial court fail to properly address the issue of an award of attorney fees?
III. Did the trial court err in finding Robert in contempt of court?
IV. Did the trial court err in not granting relief requested by Robert, and by granting judgments against Robert?
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
I. The trial court did not err in determining the value of Kautzman construction, inc., on remand, or in redetermining the property distribution in light of the revaluation of Kautzman Construction, Inc.
II. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff attorney fees and costs.
III. The trial court did not err in finding Robert in contempt of court.
IV. The trial court did not err in issuing a $1,500.00 money judgment for Robert's failure to turn over personal property.
V. The trial court did not err in ordering general money judgments for Robert's failures to comply with the third amended judgment.
Vi. Robert should be awarded a credit for all spousal support payments received by Rachel from income withholding.
Add Docket 990328 RSS