Friedt v. Hettinger County
Friedt and Emma Friedt,
attorney-in-fact for
Jacob A. Friedt, Plaintiffs and Appellants
v.
Hettinger County, North Dakota,
a political subdivision,
Valentine J. Friedt, William J.
Friedt, Lillian Friedt, Anna
Bergenheier, Victor J. Friedt,
Carleen Friedt Olson, Linda
Huether, David Friedt, Dean Friedt,
Dion Friedt, Dana Friedt, Verena
Johnson, Dwight Friedt, Carla Albrecht,
Carlotta Kostelecky, Timothy Raab,
Joshua Raab and Tanya Raab, Defendants and Appellees
Judge Allan L. Schmalenberger
| Appellee: | Kubik, Bogner, Ridl & Selinger | |
| Appellant: | Hardy, Maus & Nordsven, P.C. | |
| Appellee: | Crowley Fleck PLLP |
1. Whether the District Court erred in holding that the reservation of minerals in a deed between Alex Friedt, Sr. (not the Plaintiff herein), and Anna Friedt, husband and wife, as grantors, and Val Friedt, one of the Defendants herein, was clear and unambiguous and that the Defendants were thus entitled to summary judgment as granted in these proceedings.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the District Court was clearly erroneous in holding that the reservations of minerals in a deed between Alex Friedt, Sr. (not the Plaintiff herein), and Anna Friedt, husband and wife, as grantors, and Valentine J. Friedt, one of the Defendants herein, as grantee, was clear and unambiguous and that Valentine J. Friedt was thus entitled to summary judgment as granted in these proceedings.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the District Court erred in holding that the reservation in a Contract for Deed and subsequent Warranty Deed from Alex Friedt, Sr., and Anna Friedt, as grantors, and Appellee, Valentine Friedt, as grantee, was clear and unambiguous and that Appellees were thus entitled to Summary Judgment.
Add Docket 990374 RSS