Disciplinary Board v. Dvorak | |||||||
| 990384 |
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR
DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST SHIRLEY A. DVORAK, A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA | ||||||
| Nature of Action: | Disciplinary Proceedings (Civil) | ||||||
| Counsel: |
| ||||||
| Term: | 03/2000  Argument: 03/17/2000 10:45am | ||||||
| ND cite: | 2000 ND 98 | ||||||
| NW cite: |
611 N.W.2d 147
| ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Issues: |
Appellant's Statement of the Issues: 1. That it was not proven by clear and convincing evidence that Shirley A. Dvorak violated Rule 3.4(a), NDRPC, in that she was attempting to use legal means to protect her client's rights and her actions were not an unlawful obstruction of access to evidence. 2. That it was not proven by clear and convincing evidence that Shirley A. Dvorak violated Rule 4.4, NDRPC, in that she did not have as a substantial purpose the embarrassment or the imposition of a burden on the complainant, Debra K. Jacobs. Appellee's Statement of the Issues: I. NDRPC Rule 3.4(a) establishes that a lawyer must not obstruct another party's access to evidence. In the deposition of Complainant, Respondent effectively compromised any credibility of Complainant as a witness, by establishing that the Complainant had no personal knowledge of the veracity of "facts" she wrote in a questionnaire in support of Brenda Berg, which could subject the Complainant to liability for defamation of Weston Berg. After the deposition, Respondent sent a letter to Complainant requesting that she amend her defamatory questionnaire or Mr. Berg may pursue other legal remedies. The Court must uphold the Hearing Body's recommendation and the Disciplinary Board's Order for Dismissal of the petition against Shirley A. Dvorak unless it finds a rule violation by clear and convincing evidence, where Respondent merely took the first step to securing her client's rights for a potential defamation suit against the Complainant, and at all times the Complainant remained available as a witness for either party. II. NDRPC Rule 4.4 requires that a lawyer must not take any action with no substantial purpose other than to embarrass or burden a witness. The Court must uphold the Hearing Body's recommendation and Disciplinary Board's dismissal of the petition unless it finds a rule violation established by clear and convincing evidence, where in the course of the Weston and Brenda Berg divorce proceedings, Respondent sent a letter to Complainant's employer to preserve testimony on the Complainant's state-owned computer and to have false and potentially defamatory material removed from the public domain, and where the Disciplinary Counsel himself admitted that Respondent's actions may have been a "reasonable step toward that goal." | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1 | 12/17/1999 | NOTE: See objections to Order of Dismissal below | ||
| 2 | 12/17/1999 | Objections to Order of Dismissal | ||
| 3 | 12/17/1999 | ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Kapsner, Carol Ronning | ||
| 4 | 12/21/1999 | Prevailing Party's Verified Statement of Costs and Disbursements dtd 12-20-99 | ||
| 5 | 01/05/2000 | RECORD ON APPEAL | ||
| 6 | 01/06/2000 | Response to "Verified Statement of Costs and Disbursements" (to be considered w/merits) | ||
| 7 | 01/21/2000 | PETITIONER BRIEF | ||
| 8 | 01/21/2000 | APPENDIX (PETITIONER) | ||
| 9 | 01/21/2000 | DISK - Petitioner's Brief | ||
| 10 | 01/21/2000 | RESPONDENT BRIEF | ||
| 11 | 01/21/2000 | TRANSCRIPT DATED 6-28-99 | ||
| 12 | 01/21/2000 | DISK - TRA dated 6-28-99 | ||
| 13 | 01/24/2000 | DISK - Respondent's Brief | ||
| 14 | 01/24/2000 | Respondent's Appendix | ||
| 15 | 02/25/2000 | SITTING WITH THE COURT: Olson, Everett Nels | ||
| 16 | 03/17/2000 | APPEARANCES: Paul W. Jacobson; Kermit E. Bye | ||
| 17 | 03/17/2000 | ARGUED: Jacobson; Bye (Vol. X; page 3) | ||
| 18 | 05/18/2000 | DISPOSITION: DISCIPLINE IMPOSED | ||
| 19 | 05/18/2000 | UNANIMOUS OPINION: , Per Curiam | ||
| 20 | 05/18/2000 | Ms. Dvorak is suspended from the practice of law for one year effective June 30, 2000. | ||
| 21 | 05/18/2000 | Dvorak must apply for reinstatement in accordance with Rule 4.5, NDRLawyer Discipline and she | ||
| 22 | 05/18/2000 | must show successful completion of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam. | ||
| 23 | 05/18/2000 | Dvorak must also pay the costs and expenses of the disciplinary proceedings in an amount to | ||
| 24 | 05/18/2000 | to be determined by the Disciplinary Board. | ||
| 25 | 05/18/2000 | Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties | ||
| 26 | 05/19/2000 | Notice of Order Suspending Attorney sent to Sandi Tabor, Grand Forks Herald, Michie, Martindale | ||
| 27 | 05/19/2000 | Hubbell, US Court of Appeals, & US Supreme Court | ||
| 28 | 05/23/2000 | Notice of Order Suspending Attorney sent to District Judges & Clerk, Federal Court Judges & Clerks, | ||
| 29 | 05/23/2000 | & Misc. | ||
| 30 | 06/01/2000 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | ||
| 31 | 06/01/2000 | DISK - PER | ||
| 32 | 06/13/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER). Denied | ||
| 33 | 07/11/2000 | Faxed Motion for Stay Pending Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court, Brief in Support | ||
| 34 | 07/11/2000 | Faxed letter dated 7-10-00 from Richard W. Goldberg, Judge of U.S. Dist. Court to counsel w/attach. | ||
| 35 | 07/11/2000 | MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, BRIEF IN SUPPORT (Originals) | ||
| 36 | 07/12/2000 | Certificate of Service by Facsimile transmission to Douglas A. Bahr | ||
| 37 | 07/13/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Mot/Stay for 30 days). Granted | ||
| 38 | 07/13/2000 | Order Mailed to Parties, Disc. Bd., Doug Bahr, Dist. Judges & Clerks; Fed Judges & Clerks; Clerk's | ||
| 39 | 07/13/2000 | office misc. which includes publishers; martindale-hubbel; SBAND | ||
| 40 | 07/14/2000 | Disciplinary Counsel's Opposition to Mot. for Stay Pending Appeal to U.S. Supreme Court | ||
| 41 | 07/14/2000 | (NOTE: already acted on, but copies dist. to GWV, WAN, DVS & MMM) | ||
| 42 | 07/19/2000 | Supplemental Certificate of Record on Appeal dated July 19, 2000 (entries 53-61) which | ||
| 43 | 07/19/2000 | contains Order regarding costs of $9,214.21. | ||
| 44 | 07/25/2000 | MOTION FOR STAY EXTENSION WITH SUPPORTING BRIEF AND AFFIDAVIT OF SHIRLEY DVORAK | ||
| 45 | 07/25/2000 | Objection to Order Assessing Costs | ||
| 46 | 07/26/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Ext. of Stay until 9/11/00). Granted | ||
| 47 | 07/26/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Objection to costs) Disc. Bd. Order assessing costs is approved.. Denied | ||
| 48 | 07/26/2000 | Second Supplemental Certificate dated 7-26-00 - Entry Nos. 62 & 63 | ||
| 49 | 07/26/2000 | Dvorak is to pay costs and expenses of the Disciplinary Proceeding in the amount of $9214.21 | ||
| 50 | 07/27/2000 | Orders re: costs and stay extension mailed to Parties, Chair-D.Bd. | ||
| 51 | 07/27/2000 | Order re: stay extension mailed to Judges & Clerks NECentral Jud. Dt. & East Central Jud. Dt. | ||
| 52 | 07/27/2000 | SBAND; Federal Judges & Clerk; Bill Suter; Michael Gans; Eloise Haaland & Kathleen Narlock | ||
| 53 | 08/03/2000 | MOTION FOR STAY OF PAYMENT OF COSTS (Part No. 1 of "Motion for Requested Relief") | ||
| 54 | 08/03/2000 | MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF COURT'S DECISION (PART 2 OF "MOTION FOR REQUESTED RELIEF" | ||
| 55 | 08/03/2000 | MOTION TO GRANT A HEARING ON THE AMOUNT OF COSTS OR RECONSIDERATION (PART 3 OF MOT. FOR REQ. RELIEF | ||
| 56 | 08/07/2000 | DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL'S RESPONSE TO "MOTION FOR REQUESTED RELIEF" | ||
| 57 | 08/09/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Motion staying payment of costs). Granted | ||
| 58 | 08/09/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Motion for Clarification of Court's Decision). Denied | ||
| 59 | 08/09/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Motion to Grant Hearing on Amount of Costs or Reconsideration). Denied | ||
| 60 | 08/09/2000 | Order Mailed to Parties | ||
| 61 | 09/12/2000 | Copy of Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court (mailed 9/11/2000) | ||
| 62 | 09/18/2000 | Letter from US Supreme Court dated 9-14-00 RE: Petition for Writ of Certiorari was filed 9-11-00 | ||
| 63 | 09/18/2000 | and placed on the docket on 9-13-00 as No. 00-402. | ||
| 64 | 10/13/2000 | 3 copies of the S. Ct. of U.S. - Respondent's Brief in Opposition & Aff./Serv. | ||
| 65 | 11/06/2000 | 3 copies of S.Ct. of U.S. - Petitioner's Reply Brief & Certificate of Service | ||
| 66 | 11/17/2000 | Notification from U.S. Supreme Court that Petition for Writ of Cert. is denied | ||
| 67 | 11/22/2000 | Order Mailed to Parties, Dt. Court Judges & Clerks, Federal Judges & Clerks, Surrogate Judges, | ||
| 68 | 11/22/2000 | Sandi Tabor (SBAND), Publishers, Editor-Grand Forks Herald | ||
| 69 | 11/22/2000 | MOTION TO LIFT STAY (Sua Sponte) | ||
| 70 | 11/22/2000 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Stay lifted, Dvorak suspended for 358 days effective January 1, 2001. Granted: 01/01/2001 | ||
| 71 | 12/05/2000 | Proof of Compliance Affidavit Pursuant to Rule 6.3(F) of N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. | ||
| 72 | 12/11/2000 | Payment of costs, $9214.21 - receipt no. 13258 | ||
| 73 | 04/02/2007 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |