RULE 41. SEARCH AND SEIZURE
(a) Authority to Issue a Warrant. A state or federal magistrate acting within or for the territorial jurisdiction where the property or person sought is located, or from which it has been removed, may issue a search warrant authorized by this rule.
(b) Persons or Property Subject to Search and Seizure. A warrant may be issued for any of the following:
(1) property that constitutes evidence of a crime;
(2) contraband, the fruits of crime, or things criminally possessed;
(3) property designed or intended for use, or which is or has been used as the means of, committing a crime;
(4) a person for whose arrest there is probable cause, or who is unlawfully restrained.
(c) Issuing the Warrant.
(1) Warrant on Affidavit or Sworn Recorded Testimony.
(A) In General. A warrant other than a warrant on oral testimony under Rule 41(c)(2) may issue only on an affidavit or affidavits sworn to or sworn recorded testimony taken before a state or federal magistrate and establishing the grounds for issuing the warrant.
(B) Examination. Before ruling on a request for a warrant, the magistrate may require the affiant or other witnesses to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witnesses the affiant may produce. This examination must be recorded and made part of the proceedings.
(C) Probable Cause. If the state or federal magistrate is satisfied that
grounds for the
application exist or that there is probable cause to believe they exist, the magistrate
must issue a warrant identifying the property or person to be seized and naming or
with particularity the person or place to be searched. The finding of probable cause may be
based upon hearsay evidence in whole or in part.
(D) Command to Search. The warrant must be directed to a peace officer authorized to enforce or assist in enforcing any law of this state. It must command the officer to search, within a specified period of time not to exceed ten days, the person or place named for the property or person specified.
(E) Service and Return. The warrant
must be served in the daytime, unless the issuing
authority, by appropriate provision in the warrant, and for reasonable cause shown,
authorizes its execution at times other than daytime. It may designate a state or federal
magistrate to whom it must be returned.
(2) Warrant on Remote Communication.
(A) In General. When reasonable under the circumstances, a state or federal magistrate may issue a warrant based on sworn oral testimony communicated by telephone or other appropriate means.
(B) Application. The person requesting the warrant
shall must prepare a duplicate original
warrant and shall must read the duplicate original warrant,
verbatim, to the magistrate. The
magistrate shall must enter, verbatim, what is so read to the
magistrate on the original
warrant. The magistrate may direct the warrant to be modified.
(C) Issuance. If the magistrate is satisfied that grounds for the
application exist or that there
is probable cause to believe that they exist, the magistrate
must order the issuance of
a warrant by directing the person requesting the warrant to sign the magistrate's name on the
duplicate original warrant. The magistrate shall must
immediately sign the original warrant
and enter on the face of the original warrant the date and time when the warrant was ordered
to be issued. The finding of probable cause for a warrant on oral testimony may be based on
the same kind of evidence as is sufficient for a warrant on affidavit.
(D) Recording and Certifying Testimony. If a caller informs the
magistrate that the purpose
of the call is to request a warrant, the magistrate
immediately place under oath
each person whose testimony forms the basis of the application and each person applying for
that warrant. If a voice recording device is available, the magistrate shall
must use the device
to record the call. Otherwise a stenographic or longhand verbatim record must be made. If
a longhand verbatim record is made, the magistrate shall must
file a signed copy with the
(E) Contents. The contents of a warrant on oral testimony are the same as the contents of a warrant on affidavit.
(F) Additional Rules for Execution. The person who executes the
shall must enter
the exact time of execution on the face of the duplicate original warrant.
(G) Motion to Suppress Precluded. Absent a finding of bad faith,
evidence obtained under
a warrant issued
in accordance with under Rule 41(c)(2) is not
subject to a motion to
suppress on the ground that it was not reasonable under the circumstances to issue the
warrant on oral testimony.
(3) Warrant by Electronic Transmission.
(A) General Rule. An affidavit in support of a warrant may be submitted by electronic transmission. A warrant may be transmitted by electronic transmission.
(B) Application. The magistrate
must orally administer the oath or affirmation to the
affiant over the telephone. The affiant shall must sign the
affidavit and submit the affidavit
to the magistrate by electronic transmission. An affidavit sworn to a magistrate over the
telephone is sworn to before a magistrate for the purposes of Rule 41(c).
(C) Issuance. The magistrate
must note on the warrant the date and time of issuance
of the warrant, and indicate on the warrant that the supporting affidavit was sworn to over
the telephone. The electronic transmission has the same effect as the original.
(D) Execution. The person who executes the warrant
shall must enter the date and time of
the execution on the face of the warrant.
(d) Execution and Return With Inventory.
(1) Inventory. An officer present during the execution of the warrant
shall must prepare and
verify an inventory of any property seized. The officer must do so in the presence of the
applicant for the warrant and the person from whom, or from whose premises, the property
was taken. If either one is not present, the officer must prepare and verify the inventory in
the presence of at least one other credible person.
(2) Receipt. The officer taking property under the warrant
(A) give a copy of the warrant and a receipt for the property taken to the person from whom or from whose premises the property was taken; or
(B) leave a copy of the warrant and receipt at the place from which the officer took the property.
(3) Return. The officer executing the warrant must promptly return
it--together with a copy
of the inventory--to the magistrate designated on the warrant. The magistrate on request
must give a copy of the inventory to the person from whom, or from whose premises,
property was taken and to the applicant for the warrant.
(e) Motion for Return of Property. A person aggrieved by an unlawful
search and seizure
of property or by the deprivation of property may move the trial court for the property's
return. The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion.
If it grants the motion, the court must return the property to the
although the court may impose reasonable conditions to protect access and use of the
property in later proceedings. If a motion for return of property is made or heard after an
indictment, information, or complaint is filed, it must be treated also as a motion to suppress
under Rule 12.
(f) Motion to Suppress. A motion to suppress evidence may be made in the trial court as provided in Rule 12.
(g) Return of Papers to Clerk. The magistrate to whom the warrant is
attach to the warrant a copy of the return, inventory and all other related papers and
must file them with the clerk of the trial court.
(h) Scope and Definitions.
(1) Scope. This rule does not modify any statute regulating search or seizure, or the issuance and execution of a search warrant in special circumstances.
(2) Definitions. The following definitions apply under this rule:
(A) "Property" includes documents, books, papers and any other tangible objects.
(B) "Daytime" means the hours from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. according to local time.
Rule 41 was amended, effective September 1, 1983; March 1, 1990; March 1, 1992 January 1, 1995; March 1, 2006; March 1, 2011.
Rule 41 is an adaptation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 41 and is designed to implement the provisions of Article I, Section 8, of the North Dakota Constitution and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantee, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons and things to be seized." To implement this constitutional protection, an illegal search and seizure will bar the use of such evidence in a criminal prosecution. The suppression sanction is imposed in order to discourage abuses of power by law enforcement officials in conducting searches and seizures.
Subdivision (a) provides that a search warrant be issued by a magistrate, either state or federal, acting within or for the territorial jurisdiction. The provision which permits a federal magistrate to issue a search warrant is the reciprocal of the federal rule, which permits a state magistrate to issue a search warrant pursuant to a federal matter. It is contemplated that a search warrant will be issued by a federal magistrate only on the nonavailability of a state magistrate.
Subdivision (a) does not require that the individual requesting the search warrant be a law enforcement officer. There appears to be common-law support for the use of the search warrant as a means of getting an owner's property back. The primary purpose of the rule, however, is the authorization of a search in the interest of law enforcement and as a practical matter the request for issuance of a search warrant by someone other than a law enforcement officer is virtually nonexistent.
Subdivision (b) describes the property or persons which may be seized with a lawfully issued search warrant. Issuance of a search warrant to search for items of solely evidential value is authorized. There is no intention to limit the protection of the Fifth Amendment against compulsory self-incrimination, so items that are solely "testimonial" or "communicative" in nature might well be inadmissible on those grounds.
Paragraph (c)(1) follows the federal rule except that North Dakota's rule permits the issuance of a warrant on sworn recorded testimony without an affidavit. Probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant should be assessed under the totality-of-circumstances test.
The provision for examination of the affiant before the magistrate is intended to assure the magistrate an opportunity to make a careful decision as to whether there is probable cause based on legally obtained evidence. The requirement that the testimony be recorded is to insure an adequate basis for determining the sufficiency of the evidentiary grounds for the issuance of the search warrant if a motion to suppress is later filed.
The language of subparagraph (c)(1)(E), "for reasonable cause shown," is intended to explain the necessity for executing the warrant at a time other than the daytime. This provision is intended to be a substantive prerequisite to the issuance of a warrant that is to be executed at a time other than daytime, although it is not necessary that the quoted language ("for reasonable cause shown") be defined in subdivision (h).
Paragraph (c)(2) establishes a procedure for the issuance of a search warrant when it is not reasonably practicable for the person obtaining the warrant to present a written affidavit to a magistrate as required by paragraph (c)(1). A warrant may be issued on the basis of an oral statement of a person not in the physical presence of a magistrate. Telephone, radio, interactive television, or other electronic methods of communication are contemplated.
Subparagraph (c)(2)(D) was amended, effective March 1, 2006, to delete a sentence requiring immediate transcription of the record of a remote communication.
Paragraph (c)(3) was added, effective January 1, 1995, to provide for the issuance of warrants by facsimile transmission without the personal appearance of the affiant. Paragraph (c)(3) was amended, effective March 1, 2006, to substitute the term "electronic" for "facsimile." This change was intended to expand the means available for obtaining a warrant without the personal appearance of the affiant to include facsimile, e-mail, and other electronic transmission methods.
Subdivision (d) is intended to make clear that a copy of the warrant and an inventory receipt for property taken shall be left at the premises at the time of the lawful search or with the person from whose premises the property is taken if he is present.
Subdivision (e) requires that the motion for return of property be made in the trial court rather than in a preliminary hearing before the magistrate who issued the warrant. It further provides for a return of the property if: (1) the person is entitled to lawful possession, and (2) the seizure is illegal. However, property which is considered contraband does not have to be returned even if seized illegally. The last sentence of subdivision (e) provides that a motion for return of property, made in the trial court, shall be treated as a motion to suppress under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12. The purpose of this provision is to have a series of pretrial motions disposed of in a single appearance, such as at a Rule 17.1 (Omnibus Hearing), rather than in a series of pretrial motions made on different dates causing undue delay in administration.
Subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) were amended in 1983, effective September 1, 1983, to add persons as permissible objects of search warrants. These amendments follow 1979 amendments to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41 and are intended to make it possible for a search warrant to issue to search for a person if there is probable cause to arrest that person; or that person is being unlawfully restrained.
Subdivisions (c) and (d) were amended, effective March 1, 1990. The amendments are technical in nature and no substantive change is intended.
Subdivision (e) was amended, effective March 1, 1992, to track the federal rule.
Rule 41 was amended, effective March 1, 2006, in response to the December 1, 2002, revision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The language and organization of the rule were changed to make the rule more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules.
Sources: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of April 29-30, 2010, page 20, 25-26; April 28-29, 2005, pages 5-8; January 27-27, 2005, pages 33-34; April 28-29, 1994, pages 22-23; November 7-8, 1991, page 4; October 25-26, 1990, pages 15-16; April 20, 1989, page 4; December 3, 1987, page 15; October 15-16, 1981, pages 12-15; December 7-8, 1978, pages 23-26; October 12-13, 1978, pages 15-19; April 24-26, 1973, page 14; December 11-15, 1972, pages 31-37; November 18-20, 1971, pages 3-9; September 16-18, 1971, pages 11-32; March 12-13, 1970, page 3; November 20-21, 1969, pages 19-24; May 15-16, 1969, pages 21-23; Fed.R.Crim.P. 41.
Superseded: N.D.C.C. §§ 29-29-02, 29-29-03, 29-29-04, 29-29-05, 29-29-06, 29-29-07, 29-29-10, 29-29-11, 29-29-12, 29-29-13, 29-29-14, 29-29-15, 29-29-16, 29-29-17.
Considered: N.D.C.C. §§ 12-01-04(12), 12-01-04(13), 29-01-14(3), 29-29-01, 29-29-08, 29-29-09, 29-29-18, 29-29-19, 29-29-20, 29-29-21, 31-04-02. N.D.C.C. ch. 28-29.1. N.D.C.C. ch.19-03.1.
Cross Reference: N.D.R.Crim.P. 12 (Pleadings and Pretrial Motions); N.D.R.Crim.P. 17.1 (Omnibus Hearing and Pretrial Conference); N.D.R.Ct. 2.2 (Facsimile Transmission); N.D. Sup. Ct. Admin. R. 52 (Interactive Television).