[Go to Documents] | Filed July 13, 2005 | [Download as WordPerfect] |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Grady Jackson, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20050020 & 20050021
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Burt L. Riskedahl, Judge. State v. Jackson
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Lloyd C. Suhr, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Grady Jackson, pro se, Bismarck, N.D. 58504, defendant and appellant.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Grady Jackson appeals from two district court orders denying suppression of evidence and from the criminal judgments of conviction of driving under suspension entered on N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) conditional guilty pleas, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motions for suppression of evidence.
[¶2] Jackson did not provide a copy of the district court transcript for appeal. As the appellant in this case, it was his duty to order a transcript of the proceedings to allow this Court to have meaningful review of the facts. N.D.R.App.P. 10(b); State v. Clark, 2001 ND 194, ¶ 5, 636 N.W.2d 660. Without a transcript, this Court is unable to assess Jackson's contention that the police officers did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop him. See State v. Runck, 418 N.W.2d 262, 267 (N.D. 1987).
[¶3] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3), and (7).
| [¶4] | Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Dale V. Sandstrom Carol Ronning Kapsner Mary Muehlen Maring |