[Go to Docket] | Filed Oct. 16, 2007 | [Download as WordPerfect] |
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Andrew Thomas Jager, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20070080
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mikal Simonson, Judge. State v. Jager
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jay Anthony Schmitz (on brief), 511 2nd Avenue Southeast, Jamestown, N.D. 58401, for plaintiff and appellee.
Scott R. Sandness (on brief), P.O. Box 915, Jamestown, ND 58402-0915, for defendant and appellant.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Andrew Thomas Jager appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of possessing drug paraphernalia. Jager argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion in limine to prohibit on relevancy grounds the admission of certain prosecution testimony at trial. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion, and we summarily affirm the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
| [¶2] | Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Carol Ronning Kapsner Mary Muehlen Maring Daniel J. Crothers Dale V. Sandstrom |