RULE 81. APPLICABILITY IN GENERAL
(a) Special Statutory Proceedings. Special statutory proceedings, whether or not listed in Table A, are excepted from these rules insofar as they are inconsistent or in conflict with the Procedure and practice provided by these rules.
(b) Appeals to District Courts. These rules do not supersede the provisions of statutes relating to appeals to or review by the district courts, but shall govern procedure and practice relating thereto insofar as these rules are not inconsistent with such statutes.
(c) Rules Incorporated Into Statutes. Where any statute heretofore or hereafter enacted, whether or not listed in Table A, provides that any act in a civil proceeding shall be done in the manner provided by law or as in a civil action, such act shall be done in accordance with these rules.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Rule 81 serves the same purpose as Rule 81, FRCivP, but deviates completely as to content and construction.
Subdivision (a) and Table A were both amended, effective March 1, 1990, to clarify that the rule is not limited to special kinds of statutory procedures but rather that it is limited to special statutory proceedings. The word change from procedures to proceedings also cleared up conflicting language in Rule 81(a) in that the term proceedings appears in the headnote but not in the text of the rule.
The North Dakota Supreme Court has held that these rules govern procedures on appeal to district court from a decision of an administrative agency except where applicable statutes are inconsistent with the rules. See Reliance Insurance Company v. Public Service Commission, 250 N.W.2d 918 (N.D. 1977) and Schroeder v. Burleigh County Board of Commissioners, 252 N.W.2d 893 (N.D. 1977).
SOURCES: Joint Procedure Committee Minutes of April 20, 1989, page 4; March 24-25, 1988, page 16; September 18-19, 1980, page 14; March 27-28, 1980, pages 9-10; January 17-18, 1980, page 11; Rule 81, FRCivP.
CROSS REFERENCE: Rule 86 (Effective Date Statutes Superseded), N.D.R.Civ.P.