Benny A. Graff

State v. Fields , 2005 ND 15, 691 N.W.2d 233
Actual drug evidence, rather than indicia of drugs, obtained from a garbage search, is enough to support probable cause for a search warrant.
Nighttime search warrants cannot be issued on a per se basis in drug cases. Facts supporting probable cause to justify the necessity of the nighttime execution must be set forth.
State v. Igou , 2005 ND 16, 691 N.W.2d 213
When challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction, the defendant bears the burden of showing that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, reveals no reasonable inference of guilt.
Authority to notice obvious error on appeal is exercised cautiously and only in exceptional circumstances in which the defendant has suffered a serious injustice.
Jackson v. State , 2004 ND 177, 687 N.W.2d 253
Denial of application for post-conviction relief based on alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
State v. Mitzel , 2004 ND 157, 685 N.W.2d 120
The existence of consent and whether it is voluntary is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of the circumstances.
Consent cannot reasonably be implied from silence and failure to object.
Consent should not be lightly inferred, must be proven by clear and positive testimony, and must be unequivocal.
The government has the burden to prove that consent was voluntarily given.
The mere fact that a person has been arrested in violation of his constitutional rights casts grave doubt upon the voluntariness of a subsequent consent.
Miranda warnings are a factor to consider under the voluntariness test, but a Miranda warning cannot support voluntariness of consent when it is given after the consent.
State v. Tweeten , 2004 ND 90, 679 N.W.2d 287
A district court may not dismiss a case with prejudice for prosecutorial misconduct unless a hearing is held in which it is determined by clear and convincing evidence the prosecution has proceeded in bad faith.
Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. Ward Co. Farm Bureau , 2004 ND 60, 676 N.W.2d 752
A defendant must have standing to assert a counterclaim against a plaintiff.
The existence of standing is a question of law which is reviewed de novo.
Individual shareholders generally have no right to bring actions in their individual names and on their own behalf for a wrong committed against the corporation.
To have standing to sue individually, a shareholder must allege an injury separate and distinct from other shareholders.
The statutory right to shareholder access to corporate documents and records provides a right of inspection, not a right to receive answers to questions submitted by shareholders.
Gratech Company, Ltd. v. ND Dept. of Transportation , 2004 ND 61, 676 N.W.2d 781
All disputes arising out of any contract entered into by the Department of Transportation for the construction or repair of highways must be submitted to arbitration.
As a condition precedent to arbitration of a highway construction dispute, a contractor seeking additional compensation for work not covered in the contract must file a written notice of claim.
Elshaug v. Workforce Safety and Insurance , 2003 ND 177, 671 N.W.2d 784
A claimant has the burden of proving a right to receive workers compensation benefits or to continued benefits if they are terminated after liability for a claim has been accepted.
A claimant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the medical condition for which benefits are sought is causally related to a work injury.
State v. Thorson , 2003 ND 76, 660 N.W.2d 581
To establish obvious error, the defendant has the burden to show (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects substantial rights.
Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 16, the prosecution must disclose, upon the defendant's request, names and statements of witnesses the prosecution intends to call and also the relevant statements within the prosecution's possession or control of other persons.
The defendant's failure to discover evidence from a lack of reasonable diligence defeats a Brady claim that the prosecution withheld that evidence.
Hilton v. ND Education Association , 2002 ND 209, 655 N.W.2d 60
Counselors who were certified under N.D.C.C. ch. 15-36 and who did not devote more than fifty percent of their time to administration duties were teachers under N.D.C.C. ch. 15-38.1.
In action for intentional interference with contract, defendants act with justification if they assert a lawful object which they had a right to assert.
Wilson v. Koppy , 2002 ND 179, 653 N.W.2d 68
Mandamous is not available when there is another remedy at law.
Skadberg v. Skadberg , 2002 ND 97, 644 N.W.2d 873
To support a petition for a disorderly conduct restraining order, the petitioner must present evidence of specific acts or threats constituting disorderly conduct.
A full hearing on a disorderly conduct restraining order authorizes a district court to hear the evidence on affidavits and cross-examination.
State v. Steiger , 2002 ND 79, 644 N.W.2d 187
When sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, the evidence is examined in the light most favorable to the verdict to see whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime were established beyond a reasonable doubt.
In a criminal case tried without a jury, the trial court need only make a general finding of guilty or not guilty.
Knoll v. ND Dept. of Transportation , 2002 ND 84, 644 N.W.2d 191
If a person intentionally or unintentionally provides false information to an operator attempting to follow the State Toxicologist's approved methods for a chemical test, the person cannot challenge the foundation for admissibility of the test results on the ground that the false information resulted in the approved methods not being followed.
The outcome of a related criminal prosecution for driving under the influence is not relevant in an administrative proceeding to suspend a driver's license.
DesLauriers v. DesLauriers , 2002 ND 66, 642 N.W.2d 892
The deliberate infliction of mental anguish upon one parent and the children by the other parent is relevant to the custody determination and may be considered by the trial court.
In a custody determination, a trial court has no obligation to consider the preference of an immature child, but the trial court may determine whether or not a child is capable of intelligently choosing between parents.
The debt produced by using credit cards to benefit the entire family is, like property, neither uniquely the husband's nor the wife's and is to be allocated by the trial court in its equitable division of the marital estate.
State v. Radcliffe , 2002 ND 56, 647 N.W.2d 706
Judgment of conviction for gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Wagaman v. Burke , 2002 ND 51, 642 N.W.2d 178
An order changing summer custody into summer visitation is an order establishing custody for purposes of the two-year restriction on motions to change custody.
State v. Randall , 2002 ND 16, 639 N.W.2d 439
Under N.D.R.Ev. 609 (a)(i), the burden is on the State to point to a danger of prejudice that substantially outweighs the probative value of prior convictions offered by a defendant in a criminal case to impeach a witness for the State.
Error is harmless under N.D.R.Ev. 609(a)(i) if the witness's credibility was sufficiently impeached by other evidence, or if the State's case was strong enough to support a conviction even apart from the witness's testimony.
State v. Baumgartner , 2001 ND 202, 637 N.W.2d 14
One cannot be an accomplice without having the requisite criminal intent for the underlying offense, even if he or she is a co-conspirator.
Law enforcement officers who feign complicity in a crime in the pursuit of evidence are not accomplices.
The purpose of a motion to dismiss is to test the sufficiency of the information or indictment. It is not a device for summary trial of the evidence, and facts not appearing on the face of the information cannot be considered.
State v. Martin , 2001 ND 189, 636 N.W.2d 447
To be convicted of continual sexual abuse of a child, one must be shown to have engaged in three or more sexual acts or contacts during a period of three months or more. This period has no maximum time limit.
State v. Berger , 2001 ND 44, 623 N.W.2d 25
Absent actual prejudice, violation of the statutory right to consult with counsel before submitting to an Intoxilyzer test is properly challenged by a motion to suppress the results of the test, rather than a motion to dismiss the charge.
A defendant must be provided a reasonable opportunity to make long distance telephone calls to consult with an attorney, if the defendant pays for the call and it does not interfere with valid testing.
Carry Mocassin v. State Farm , 2001 ND 26, 625 N.W.2d 264
Summary judgment dismissing claims for deceit, negligent misrepresentation, bad faith, and infliction of emotional distress is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).
Vogel v. Braun , 2001 ND 29, 622 N.W.2d 216
A prison inmate may access funds in his release aid account if authorized by the warden.
A trial court may deny a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if the action is totally without merit.
A party requesting oral argument under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a) cannot complain about a lack of notice of a time change brought about at his request.
Davenport v. State , 2000 ND 218, 620 N.W.2d 164
Although a trial court must inform a defendant of all direct consequences of a guilty plea, it need not advise a defendant of collateral consequences
The requirement for registration of a convicted sex offender is a collateral consequence.
State v. Loh , 2000 ND 188, 618 N.W.2d 477
An officer has probable cause justifying a vehicle stop, based on evidence of a traffic violation, which is not invalidated when an officer subjectively suspects another offense.
Following a vehicle for five miles before initiating an investigatory stop does not invalidate the probable cause justifying the vehicle stop.
Snortland v. State ex rel. Dept. of Public Instruction , 2000 ND 162, 615 N.W.2d 574
Summary judgment on the issue of when a statute of limitations begins to run is appropriate if the evidence is such that reasonable minds could draw but one conclusion.
Ruscheinsky v. Ulrich , 2000 ND 133, 612 N.W.2d 283
An order for child support that is due and unpaid can constitute a judgment by operation of law. Since April 2, 1999, such judgments are no longer subject to a statute of limitations or to cancellation.
The child support arrearage amount on a certified State Disbursement Unit ledger is prima facie evidence of the state's records.
Hopfauf v. ND Workers Comp. , 2000 ND 94, 610 N.W.2d 60
A claimant who willfully makes a false statement or who receives disability benefits and willfully fails to notify the Workers Compensation Bureau of work or income from work must reimburse the Bureau for benefits paid, based upon the false statement, and forfeits any additional benefits relative to that injury.
In a second appeal, questions that could have been raised in a previous appeal will not be examined.
State v. Serr , 2000 ND 76, 617 N.W.2d 131
Convictions for possession of controlled substances with the intent to deliver summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Buchmann v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 2000 ND 79, 609 N.W.2d 437
Due process under the state and federal constitutions requires the Workers Compensation Bureau to give a claimant pre-termination notice of its intent to terminate disability benefits, a summary of the evidence supporting termination, and an opportunity to respond.
The Workers Compensation Bureau may weigh the evidence before it, although it may not pick and choose in an unreasonable manner.
Ash v. Traynor , 2000 ND 75, 609 N.W.2d 96
N.D.C.C. 65-02-08 prohibits an attorney from receiving double fees from a client and the Bureau for legal services rendered to the client in proceedings before the Bureau. The statute does not prohibit a client from entering a fee agreement with the attorney and then, upon prevailing in the case, seeking reimbursement from the Bureau, in the amount of the statutory fees allowed under the statute.
DeCoteau v. State , 2000 ND 44, 608 N.W.2d 240
To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove his counsel's performance was defective, and his defense was prejudiced by the proven defect.
An unsuccessful trial strategy does not make defense counsel's performance defective.
State v. Koble , 2000 ND 29, 606 N.W.2d 521
The N.D.C.C. 19-03.1-36 statutory promptness requirement does not apply to N.D.C.C. ch. 29-31.1 civil forfeitures.
State v. Stewart , 1999 ND 154, 598 N.W.2d 773
The administrative remedy for making a false claim or false statements to the Workers Compensation Bureau is a civil sanction, and the double jeopardy clause does not bar a subsequent criminal prosecution for the same conduct.
Hoff v. Berg , 1999 ND 115, 595 N.W.2d 285
North Dakota's statutory law requiring a court to grant grandparent's visitation unless found not in the child's best interests is unconstitutional, and creating a presumption that grandparent's visitation is in the child's best interests is unconstitutional.
When changes to a statute are declared unconstitutional, the preexisting statute remains in effect.
Tibor v. Bendrick , 1999 ND 92, 593 N.W.2d 395
Under the child support guidelines, a lump sum payment of social security disability benefits must be credited toward the obligor's child support arrearages which accrued during the months the payment was intended to cover.
Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Nevland , 1999 ND 51, 591 N.W.2d 109
To defeat summary judgment, a party asserting an affirmative defense must set forth specific facts showing there is a genuine issue for trial on that defense.
Conclusory statements concerning a depressed agricultural economy unsupported by specific facts are insufficient to raise the "confiscatory price defenses."
City of Bismarck v. Towne , 1999 ND 49, 590 N.W.2d 893
Failure to object to parts or omissions of proposed jury instructions operates as a waiver under N.D.R.Crim.P. (30)(c) of the right on appeal to complain of instructions that were or were not given.
To preserve sufficiency of the evidence in a jury trial for review on appeal, the defendant must move the trial court for a judgment of acquittal under N.D.R.Crim.P. 29.
State v. Burger , 1999 ND 30, 590 N.W.2d 197
The intended victim's failure to rely upon the defendant's deceptive conduct does not preclude liability for attempted theft by deception.
DeCoteau v. State , 1998 ND 199, 586 N.W.2d 156
When a conviction is summarily affirmed on direct appeal, the denial of an ineffective assistance claim is without prejudice to raising the issue in a post-conviction proceeding.
When applicant for post-conviction relief shows potentially relevant and admissible testimony not introduced at trial, and trial counsel's failure to offer the evidence raises a reasonable inference of ineffective representation, a trial court errs by summarily denying the application without a hearing.
Lawrence v. Delkamp , 1998 ND 178, 584 N.W.2d 515
Under N.D.C.C.14-09-09.10(8) and N.D. Admin. Code 75-02-04.1-01(5), employer-paid benefits which included contributions to a 401(k) plan, medical insurance premiums, dental insurance premiums, life insurance premiums, accidental death and disability insurance premiums, long-term disability insurance premiums, and pension fund contributions were all properly included as gross income for a determination of the employee's child support obligation.
Nastrom v. Nastrom , 1998 ND 142, 581 N.W.2d 919
A district court has broad discretion in setting the scope of discovery, and will not be reversed unless there is an abuse of discretion.
A district court does not abuse its discretion when there is a rational reason for entry of a protective order.
Tibor v. Tibor , 1998 ND 124, 585 N.W.2d 581
Child support order summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
Billey v. ND Stockmen's Assn , 1998 ND 120, 579 N.W.2d 171
A plaintiff's motive for bringing suit is irrelevant to the determination whether he has standing.
The North Dakota Stockmen's Association acts as an agent for the State when performing brand inspection and registration services, and the fees generated by those services are "public moneys" which must be paid over to the State Treasurer under N.D. Const. Art. X, section 12.
Those portions of N.D.C.C. sections 36-09-18 and 36-22-03 which direct payment of brand inspection and recording fees into the general fund of the North Dakota Stockmen's Association are unconstitutional.
The Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, 7 U.S.C. sections 181-231, was not intended to wholly occupy the field and does not preempt state laws governing brand inspection.
A state requirement fees collected by the North Dakota Stockmen's Association for brand inspection services be paid over to the State Treasurer does not conflict with 7 U.S.C. section 217a(c).
Ash v. Traynor , 1998 ND 112, 579 N.W.2d 180
The 1997 version of NDCC 65-05-09.3 canceling a worker's compensation permanent total disability benefits when the injured worker became eligible for social security retirement benefits, and replacing them with a much smaller "additional benefit" under NDCC 65-05-09.4, does not apply to a worker who was already receiving permanent total disability benefits before the statute took effect.
Nastrom v. Nastrom , 1998 ND 75, 576 N.W.2d 215
Under NDRAppP 4(a), a 30-day extension of time to file an appeal may be granted at the discretion of the trial court upon a showing of excusable neglect.
Evidence of unique or extraordinary circumstances is needed to excuse a failure to file a timely notice of appeal.
The time for filing an appeal is jurisdictional and, without jurisdiction, this court must dismiss an appeal.
Hausauer v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 1997 ND 243, 572 N.W.2d 426
The Bureau properly dismisses a workers' compensation claim where claimant willfully made material false statements in connection with his claim.
Cermak v. Cermak , 1997 ND 187, 569 N.W.2d 280
A recipient spouse's unmarried cohabitation is not a remarriage and is insufficient, alone, to terminate a permanent spousal support obligation.
The district court's finding that a reduction of spousal support is not warranted because nothing has changed since the original decree is not clearly erroneous.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to award attorney's fees.
Lange v. State , 1997 ND 136, 575 N.W.2d 224
Denial of application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under NDRAppP 35.1(a)(6) and (7).
State v. DeCoteau , 1997 ND 121, 569 N.W.2d 288
Conviction of gross sexual imposition summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Adams County Record v. GNDA , 1997 ND 116, 564 N.W.2d 304
The trial court's finding that the Greater North Dakota Association is not an organization supported by public funds and, therefore, is not subject to the open records law was not clearly erroneous. Mutuality of obligation, apart from legal consideration, is not necessary to create a binding unilateral contract. The state's agreement to provide the Greater North Dakota Association monetary reimbursement when the Association published Horizons magazine constituted a bargained-for exchange of money and services, rather than public support.
Kubista v. Director, ND Dept. of Transportation , 562 N.W.2d 104 (N.D. 1996)
Judgment affirming an administrative suspension of the appellant's driving privileges is summarily affirmed under Rule 35.1, N.D.R.App.P.
Goodleft v. Gullickson , 556 N.W.2d 303 (N.D. 1996)
Under N.D.C.C. 32-21-03, the decedent's grandmother was not entitled to bring a wrongful death claim as a 'surviving mother or father,' or in her capacity as personal representative of the decedent's estate.
Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 17(a), the trial court should have granted the decedent's grandmother a reasonable time for the substitution of the decedent's parents as plaintiffs, or for the parents' ratification of the wrongful death claim.
State v. Keller , 550 N.W.2d 411 (N.D. 1996)
There was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict finding the defendant guilty of stalking.
Horner v. Horner , 549 N.W.2d 669 (N.D. 1996)
Bruner v. Hager , 547 N.W.2d 551 (N.D. 1996)
Gerhardt v. E.C. , 546 N.W.2d 359 (N.D. 1996)
City of Bismarck v. Stuart , 546 N.W.2d 366 (N.D. 1996)
City of Bismarck v. Feist , 551 N.W.2d 567 (N.D. 1996)
State v. Lutze, a/k/a Lutz , 551 N.W.2d 567 (N.D. 1996)
Evans v. State , 551 N.W.2d 567 (N.D. 1996)
Wilhelm v. Wilhelm , 543 N.W.2d 488 (N.D. 1996)
Secret Moments v. Bertsch , 544 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1995)
Hawley v. Dir., Dept. of Transportation , 544 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1995)
Olson v. City of Garrison , 539 N.W.2d 663 (N.D. 1995)
Maher v. Dept. of Transportation , 539 N.W.2d 300 (N.D. 1995)
Cermak v. Cermak , 544 N.W.2d 176 (N.D. 1995)
State v. Davenport , 536 N.W.2d 686 (N.D. 1995)
Schumacher v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 536 N.W.2d 355 (N.D. 1995)
Horstmeyer v. Golden Eagle Fireworks , 534 N.W.2d 835 (N.D. 1995)
Bruner v. Hager , 534 N.W.2d 825 (N.D. 1995)
Adoption of J.S.P.L. , 532 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 1995)
Johnson v. ND Dept. of Transportation , 530 N.W.2d 359 (N.D. 1995)
Fischer v. ND Workers Comp , 530 N.W.2d 344 (N.D. 1995)
Zahn v. Graff , 530 N.W.2d 645 (N.D. 1995)
Adams County Record v. Greater North Dakota Association , 529 N.W.2d 830 (N.D. 1995)
Bickel v. Jackson , 530 N.W.2d 318 (N.D. 1995)
Delzer v. United Bank of Bismarck , 527 N.W.2d 650 (N.D. 1995)
Jensen v. Wrolstad , 526 N.W.2d 113 (N.D. 1994)
Lange v. State , 522 N.W.2d 179 (N.D. 1994)
Ollie v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 520 N.W.2d 233 (N.D. 1994)
Bashus v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 519 N.W.2d 296 (N.D. 1994)
Gabriel v. Gabriel , 519 N.W.2d 293 (N.D. 1994)
Cass Co. Electric Coop. v. Northern States Power , 518 N.W.2d 216 (N.D. 1994)
State v. Thiel , 515 N.W.2d 186 (N.D. 1994)
Jahner v. Jacob , 515 N.W.2d 183 (N.D. 1994)
Rott v. Jaeger , 510 N.W.2d 651 (N.D. 1994)
Maher v. ND Dept. of Transportation , 510 N.W.2d 601 (N.D. 1994)
City of Bismarck v. Santineau , 509 N.W.2d 56 (N.D. 1993)
Erickson v. Director, ND Dept. of Transportation , 507 N.W.2d 537 (N.D. 1993)
Marchand v. City of Harvey , 509 N.W.2d 273 (N.D. 1993)
State v. Frohlich , 506 N.W.2d 729 (N.D. 1993)
Salter v. ND Dept. of Transportation , 505 N.W.2d 111 (N.D. 1993)
State v. Thompson , 504 N.W.2d 315 (N.D. 1993)
Littlefield v. Union State Bank , 500 N.W.2d 881 (N.D. 1993)
State v. Knudson , 499 N.W.2d 872 (N.D. 1993)
State of ND ex rel. Hanson v. Quill Corp. , 500 N.W.2d 196 (N.D. 1993)
Lambott v. Job Service North Dakota , 498 N.W.2d 157 (N.D. 1993)
State v. Lange , 497 N.W.2d 83 (N.D. 1993)
Syverson, Rath and Mehrer, P.C. v. ND State Auditor , 495 N.W.2d 79 (N.D. 1993)
MacDonald v. ND Commission on Medical Competency , 492 N.W.2d 94 (N.D. 1992)
Wiedmeier v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 491 N.W.2d 712 (N.D. 1992)
Bjorgen v. Kinsey , 491 N.W.2d 389 (N.D. 1992)
State v. McNair , 491 N.W.2d 397 (N.D. 1992)
Thompson v. ND Workers' Compensation Bureau , 490 N.W.2d 248 (N.D. 1992)
Domres v. Backes , 487 N.W.2d 605 (N.D. 1992)
Ennis v. Schuetzle , 488 N.W.2d 867 (N.D. 1992)
Frost v. ND Department of Transportation , 487 N.W.2d 6 (N.D. 1992)
Anderson v. Svanes , 485 N.W.2d 353 (N.D. 1992)
Harley Miller Construction, Inc. v. Russell , 481 N.W.2d 459 (N.D. 1992)
Richmond v. Haney , 480 N.W.2d 751 (N.D. 1992)
Turnbow v. Job Service North Dakota , 479 N.W.2d 827 (N.D. 1992)
Boschee v. Mandan Public School District , 478 N.W.2d 276 (N.D. 1991)
K & L Homes, Inc. v. Burleigh County , 478 N.W.2d 376 (N.D. 1991)
Tweeten v. Miller , 477 N.W.2d 822 (N.D. 1991)
Van Klootwyk v. Arman , 477 N.W.2d 590 (N.D. 1991)
Walker v. Schneider , 477 N.W.2d 167 (N.D. 1991)
PCA of Mandan v. Rub , 475 N.W.2d 532 (N.D. 1991)
Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Asbridge , 474 N.W.2d 490 (N.D. 1991)
Adolph Rub Trust v. Rub , 473 N.W.2d 442 (N.D. 1991)
Jensen v. Powers , 472 N.W.2d 223 (N.D. 1991)
State of ND ex rel. Heitkamp v. Quill Corp. , 470 N.W.2d 203 (N.D. 1991)
State of ND ex rel. Heitkamp v. Quill Corp. , 487 N.W.2d 598 (N.D. 1991)
Bjorgen v. Kinsey , 466 N.W.2d 553 (N.D. 1991)
State v. Lovejoy , 464 N.W.2d 386 (N.D. 1990)
Kronberger v. Zins , 463 N.W.2d 656 (N.D. 1990)
State v. Murchison , 464 N.W.2d 205 (N.D. 1990)
Pfliger v. Pfliger , 461 N.W.2d 432 (N.D. 1990)
Schloesser v. Larson , 458 N.W.2d 257 (N.D. 1990)
Farrell v. Miller , 458 N.W.2d 513 (N.D. 1990)
Keepseagle v. Backes , 454 N.W.2d 312 (N.D. 1990)
Schmidt v. First National Bank and Trust Company , 453 N.W.2d 602 (N.D. 1990)
Northern States Power Co. v. North Dakota Public Service Commission , 452 N.W.2d 340 (N.D. 1990)
State v. Haugen , 449 N.W.2d 784 (N.D. 1989)
Interest of M.M.S. , 449 N.W.2d 574 (N.D. 1989)
State v. Mische , 448 N.W.2d 415 (N.D. 1989)
State v. Bohe , 447 N.W.2d 277 (N.D. 1989)
Fleck v. Jacques Seed Company , 445 N.W.2d 649 (N.D. 1989)
Baranyk v. McDowell , 442 N.W.2d 423 (N.D. 1989)
Bank of Steele v. Lang , 441 N.W.2d 648 (N.D. 1989)
White v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau , 441 N.W.2d 908 (N.D. 1989)
First Security Bank, Underwood v. Enyart , 439 N.W.2d 801 (N.D. 1989)
Benjamin v. Benjamin , 439 N.W.2d 527 (N.D. 1989)
State v. Michlitsch , 438 N.W.2d 175 (N.D. 1989)
Butler v. Roberts , 437 N.W.2d 839 (N.D. 1989)
Capital City Foods, Inc. v. Job Service ND , 438 N.W.2d 198 (N.D. 1989)
Wells County Water Resource Dist. v. Solberg , 434 N.W.2d 577 (N.D. 1989)
Schmidt v. Schmidt , 432 N.W.2d 860 (N.D. 1988)
Sadler v. Basin Electric , 431 N.W.2d 296 (N.D. 1988)
A.P.I., Inc. v. United States of America , 430 N.W.2d 333 (N.D. 1988)
F-M Asphalt v. North Dakota Highway Department , 430 N.W.2d 344 (N.D. 1988)
Commercial Bank of Mott v. Stewart , 429 N.W.2d 402 (N.D. 1988)
Eide Ford Mercury Lincoln, Inc. v. Rhone , 430 N.W.2d 63 (N.D. 1988)
Berger v. Gratz , 430 N.W.2d 63 (N.D. 1988)
Choukalos v. ND State Personnel Board , 429 N.W.2d 441 (N.D. 1988)
State v. Johnson , 430 N.W.2d 63 (N.D. 1988)
Northwestern National Life Ins. v. Delzer , 425 N.W.2d 365 (N.D. 1988)
Emter v. Bulk, Inc. , 423 N.W.2d 496 (N.D. 1988)
Estate of Zins v. Zins , 420 N.W.2d 729 (N.D. 1988)
Bower v. State Highway Commissioner , 422 N.W.2d 98 (N.D. 1988)
State v. Windhorst , 422 N.W.2d 98 (N.D. 1988)
Bahmiller v. Dietz , 420 N.W.2d 3 (N.D. 1988)
Northwestern Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. of Fargo v. Biby , 418 N.W.2d 786 (N.D. 1988)
Cass Co. Electric Cooperative v. ND Public Service Commission , 419 N.W.2d 181 (N.D. 1988)
State v. Hensel , 417 N.W.2d 849 (N.D. 1988)
Herman v. Newman Signs, Inc. , 417 N.W.2d 179 (N.D. 1987)
Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Asbridge , 414 N.W.2d 596 (N.D. 1987)
Zajac v. Great American Insurance Companies , 410 N.W.2d 155 (N.D. 1987)
Kahl v. ND State Highway Commissioner , 408 N.W.2d 742 (N.D. 1987)
Imperial Oil v. Industrial Commission , 406 N.W.2d 700 (N.D. 1987)
Kuntz v. State Highway Commissioner , 405 N.W.2d 285 (N.D. 1987)
Lund v. ND Highway Department , 403 N.W.2d 25 (N.D. 1987)
Straub v. Lessman , 403 N.W.2d 5 (N.D. 1987)
Wisdom v. State ex rel. ND Real Estate Commission , 403 N.W.2d 19 (N.D. 1987)
Kuller v. Ganje , 403 N.W.2d 397 (N.D. 1987)
Bank of Steele v. Lang , 399 N.W.2d 293 (N.D. 1987)
Patten v. Green , 397 N.W.2d 458 (N.D. 1986)
Bailey v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. , 398 N.W.2d 120 (N.D. 1986)
Patzer v. Glaser , 396 N.W.2d 740 (N.D. 1986)
Golde v. Bergan , 398 N.W.2d 741 (N.D. 1986)
Berger v. State Highway Commissioner , 394 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1986)
Anderson v. Anderson , 390 N.W.2d 554 (N.D. 1986)
Ranta v. McCarney , 391 N.W.2d 161 (N.D. 1986)
Interest of L.D.R.T. , 391 N.W.2d 594 (N.D. 1986)
State v. White , 390 N.W.2d 43 (N.D. 1986)
Wiedemeier v. Herr , 392 N.W.2d 88 (N.D. 1986)
Kelsh v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 388 N.W.2d 870 (N.D. 1986)
Dennis v. Dennis , 387 N.W.2d 234 (N.D. 1986)
Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Thomas , 386 N.W.2d 29 (N.D. 1986)
F-M Asphalt, Inc. v. North Dakota State Highway Department , 384 N.W.2d 663 (N.D. 1986)
State v. Kingsley , 383 N.W.2d 828 (N.D. 1986)
Industry Financial Corporation v. Redman , 383 N.W.2d 847 (N.D. 1986)
Perry v. Perry , 382 N.W.2d 628 (N.D. 1986)
Richter v. Jones , 378 N.W.2d 209 (N.D. 1985)
Matter of Kary , 376 N.W.2d 320 (N.D. 1985)
State v. Riedinger , 374 N.W.2d 866 (N.D. 1985)
State v. Tibor , 373 N.W.2d 877 (N.D. 1985)
State v. Jensen , 373 N.W.2d 902 (N.D. 1985)
Loran v. Iszler , 373 N.W.2d 870 (N.D. 1985)
Moore v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 374 N.W.2d 71 (N.D. 1985)
Heidt v. State , 372 N.W.2d 857 (N.D. 1985)
Patten v. Green , 369 N.W.2d 105 (N.D. 1985)
Anderson v. Anderson , 368 N.W.2d 566 (N.D. 1985)
Haggard v. Meier , 368 N.W.2d 539 (N.D. 1985)
State v. Biby , 366 N.W.2d 460 (N.D. 1985)
Elhard v. Prairie Distributors, Inc. , 366 N.W.2d 465 (N.D. 1985)
Dennis v. Dennis , 366 N.W.2d 474 (N.D. 1985)
State v. Schlickenmayer , 364 N.W.2d 108 (N.D. 1985)
Martin v. Weckerly , 364 N.W.2d 93 (N.D. 1985)
Cloverdale Foods Co. v. City of Mandan , 364 N.W.2d 56 (N.D. 1985)
Almont Lumber & Equipment Co. v. Hatzenbuehler , 359 N.W.2d 384 (N.D. 1985)
State v. J.P. Lamb Land Co. , 359 N.W.2d 368 (N.D. 1984)
Kobilansky v. Liffrig , 358 N.W.2d 781 (N.D. 1984)
State v. O'Boyle , 356 N.W.2d 122 (N.D. 1984)
Ganske v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 355 N.W.2d 800 (N.D. 1984)
Patzer v. Glaser , 355 N.W.2d 798 (N.D. 1984)
Quist v. Best Western International, Inc. , 354 N.W.2d 656 (N.D. 1984)
Buzick v. North Dakota State Highway Commissioner , 351 N.W.2d 438 (N.D. 1984)
Pioneer Realty & Land Co. v. Mortgage Plus, Inc. , 346 N.W.2d 286 (N.D. 1984)
Grant Farmers Mutual Fire & Lightning Ins. Co. v. State Tax Commissioner , 347 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1984)
N.D. Real Estate Comm'n v. Boschee , 347 N.W.2d 331 (N.D. 1984)
Rippley v. Sande , 344 N.W.2d 490 (N.D. 1984)
Hammond v. North Dakota State Personnel Board , 345 N.W.2d 359 (N.D. 1984)
Mauch v. Manufacturers Sales & Service, Inc. , 345 N.W.2d 338 (N.D. 1984)
Gegelman v. Gegelman , 342 N.W.2d 404 (N.D. 1984)
First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Compass Investment, Inc. , 342 N.W.2d 214 (N.D. 1983)
Kilzer v. Binstock , 339 N.W.2d 569 (N.D. 1983)
Washburn Public School District No. 4 v. State Bd. of Public Education , 338 N.W.2d 664 (N.D. 1983)
Roll v. Keller , 336 N.W.2d 648 (N.D. 1983)
Gross v. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. , 336 N.W.2d 359 (N.D. 1983)
Jensen v. Zuern , 336 N.W.2d 330 (N.D. 1983)
Trehus v. Job Service , 336 N.W.2d 362 (N.D. 1983)
The John Larson Co. v. Brunsoman , 335 N.W.2d 327 (N.D. 1983)
State v. Schlickenmayer , 334 N.W.2d 196 (N.D. 1983)
Jones v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 334 N.W.2d 188 (N.D. 1983)
State v. Jensen , 333 N.W.2d 686 (N.D. 1983)
Bergquist-Walker Real Estate, Inc. v. William Clairmont, Inc. , 333 N.W.2d 414 (N.D. 1983)
Muehler v. Muehler , 333 N.W.2d 432 (N.D. 1983)
Jensen v. Satran , 332 N.W.2d 222 (N.D. 1983)
State v. Jensen , 331 N.W.2d 42 (N.D. 1983)
Gerhardt v. D.L.K. , 327 N.W.2d 113 (N.D. 1982)
Towne v. Sautter , 326 N.W.2d 694 (N.D. 1982)
John Larson Co. v. Brunsoman , 326 N.W.2d 72 (N.D. 1982)
Okken v. Okken Estate , 325 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 1982)
State v. Cox , 325 N.W.2d 181 (N.D. 1982)
Gross v. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. , 322 N.W.2d 679 (N.D. 1982)
First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Compass Investments, Inc. , 321 N.W.2d 921 (N.D. 1982)
Fetzer Electric, Inc. v. Develco, Inc. , 321 N.W.2d 521 (N.D. 1982)
Kerzmann v. Rohweder , 321 N.W.2d 84 (N.D. 1982)
Hampson v. Satran , 319 N.W.2d 796 (N.D. 1982)
State v. Borden , 316 N.W.2d 93 (N.D. 1982)
State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. City of Bismarck , 316 N.W.2d 85 (N.D. 1982)
Hammeren v. North Dakota State Highway Commissioner , 315 N.W.2d 679 (N.D. 1982)
Haggard v. OK RV Sales , 315 N.W.2d 475 (N.D. 1982)
Ottert Tail Power Co. v. Demchuk , 314 N.W.2d 298 (N.D. 1982)
Bismarck Public School District No. 1 v. Ritterbush Associates, P.C. , 313 N.W.2d 712 (N.D. 1981)
Inglis v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 312 N.W.2d 318 (N.D. 1981)
Erickson v. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co. , 311 N.W.2d 579 (N.D. 1981)
Lind v. Wells County Social Service Board , 311 N.W.2d 547 (N.D. 1981)
Dakota Northwestern Bank v. Schollmeyer , 311 N.W.2d 164 (N.D. 1981)
Pfliger v. Peavey Co. , 310 N.W.2d 742 (N.D. 1981)
Sigurdson v. Lahr & Lahr, Inc. , 310 N.W.2d 580 (N.D. 1981)
Woodbury v. Pfliiger , 309 N.W.2d 104 (N.D. 1981)
Peterson v. City of Golden Valley , 308 N.W.2d 550 (N.D. 1981)
Morton County v. Henke , 308 N.W.2d 372 (N.D. 1981)
Amoco Production Co. v. North Dakota Industrial Commission , 307 N.W.2d 839 (N.D. 1981)
City of Casselton v. North Dakota Public Service Commission , 307 N.W.2d 849 (N.D. 1981)
Mills v. Bd. of County Commissioners, Burleigh County , 305 N.W.2d 832 (N.D. 1981)
Eck v. City of Bismarck , 302 N.W.2d 739 (N.D. 1981)
State v. Carpenter , 301 N.W.2d 106 (N.D. 1980)
Erdle v. Dorgan , 300 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 1980)
Jochim v. Jochim , 306 N.W.2d 196 (N.D. 1980)
Park View Manor, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the County of Stutsman , 300 N.W.2d 218 (N.D. 1980)
Jochim v. Jochim , 299 N.W.2d 565 (N.D. 1980)
Anderson v. Kroh , 301 N.W.2d 359 (N.D. 1980)
Gernand v. Ost Services, Inc. , 298 N.W.2d 500 (N.D. 1980)
State v. Swenningson , 297 N.W.2d 405 (N.D. 1980)
Clairmont v. State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. , 295 N.W.2d 154 (N.D. 1980)
Geigle v. Geigle , 294 N.W.2d 386 (N.D. 1980)
Bismarck Tribune Co. v. Bowman , 293 N.W.2d 133 (N.D. 1980)
Wayne v. Braun , 292 N.W.2d 578 (N.D. 1980)
State of Oregon, ex rel. Krueger v. Krueger , 292 N.W.2d 60 (N.D. 1980)
Interest of S.W. , 290 N.W.2d 675 (N.D. 1980)
State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. All-American Sub, Inc. , 289 N.W.2d 772 (N.D. 1980)
Corbin v. Corbin , 288 N.W.2d 61 (N.D. 1980)
Park View Manor, Inc. v. Housing Authority of the County of Stutsman , 287 N.W.2d 83 (N.D. 1979)
Town & Country Co-op v. Lang , 286 N.W.2d 482 (N.D. 1979)
Bender v. Time Insurance Co. , 286 N.W.2d 489 (N.D. 1979)
Sierra Life Insurance Co. v. Wigen , 286 N.W.2d 296 (N.D. 1979)
St. Alexius Hospital v. Eckert , 284 N.W.2d 441 (N.D. 1979)
Cowan v. Stroup , 284 N.W.2d 447 (N.D. 1979)
Power Fuels, Inc. v. Elkin , 283 N.W.2d 214 (N.D. 1979)
Eck v. City of Bismarck , 283 N.W.2d 193 (N.D. 1979)
Center State Bank v. State Banking Board , 283 N.W.2d 183 (N.D. 1979)
Insurance Services Office v. Knutson , 283 N.W.2d 395 (N.D. 1979)
Center State Bank v. State Banking Board , 276 N.W.2d 132 (N.D. 1979)
McCommon v. Hennings , 283 N.W.2d 166 (N.D. 1979)
Alumni Association v. Hart Agency, Inc. , 283 N.W.2d 119 (N.D. 1979)
Bettger v. Bettger , 280 N.W.2d 915 (N.D. 1979)
Aus v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 280 N.W.2d 911 (N.D. 1979)
Rolland v. Grand Forks Public School District No. 1 , 279 N.W.2d 889 (N.D. 1979)
State v. Knoefler , 279 N.W.2d 658 (N.D. 1979)
State v. Folk , 278 N.W.2d 410 (N.D. 1979)
Interest of N.N. , 278 N.W.2d 150 (N.D. 1979)
Dairy Department of North Dakota v. Harvey Cheese, Inc. , 278 N.W.2d 137 (N.D. 1979)
Bender v. Bender , 276 N.W.2d 695 (N.D. 1979)
Nastrom v. Nastrom , 284 N.W.2d 576 (N.D. 1979)
Nastrom v. Nastrom , 276 N.W.2d 130 (N.D. 1979)
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. North Dakota Workmen's Comp. Bur. , 275 N.W.2d 618 (N.D. 1979)
Dan Dugan Transport Co. v. Maas Transport Inc. , 275 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 1979)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Amerada Hess Corporation , 275 N.W.2d 304 (N.D. 1979)
Saba v. City of Bismarck , 275 N.W.2d 302 (N.D. 1979)
Wasem v. Laskowski , 274 N.W.2d 219 (N.D. 1979)
A & A Metal Buildings v. I-S, Inc. , 274 N.W.2d 183 (N.D. 1978)
Goetz v. Anderson , 274 N.W.2d 175 (N.D. 1978)
Apple Creek Township v. City of Bismarck , 271 N.W.2d 583 (N.D. 1978)
State v. Packineau , 270 N.W.2d 336 (N.D. 1978)
Arneson v. Olson , 270 N.W.2d 125 (N.D. 1978)
City of Dickinson v. State Board of Equalization , 268 N.W.2d 589 (N.D. 1978)
Lumber Mart, Inc. v. Haas International Sales & Service, Inc. , 269 N.W.2d 83 (N.D. 1978)
Haugland v. Hoyt , 267 N.W.2d 803 (N.D. 1978)
Interest of K.P. , 267 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 1978)
Landers v. Goetz , 264 N.W.2d 459 (N.D. 1978)
Nastrom v. Nastrom , 262 N.W.2d 487 (N.D. 1978)
Lee v. North Dakota Park Service , 262 N.W.2d 467 (N.D. 1977)
State v. Piper , 261 N.W.2d 650 (N.D. 1977)
City of Bismarck v. Thom , 261 N.W.2d 640 (N.D. 1977)
Geigle v. Geigle , 264 N.W.2d 888 (N.D. 1977)
Geigle v. Geigle , 261 N.W.2d 399 (N.D. 1977)
Estate of Koch , 259 N.W.2d 655 (N.D. 1977)
State v. Carlson , 258 N.W.2d 253 (N.D. 1977)
Dorgan v. Mercil , 256 N.W.2d 114 (N.D. 1977)
Lanterman v. Dorgan , 255 N.W.2d 891 (N.D. 1977)
Zuraff v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. , 252 N.W.2d 302 (N.D. 1977)
Johnson v. Gray , 251 N.W.2d 923 (N.D. 1977)
Jahner v. Jacob , 252 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 1977)
O'Leary v. Coenen , 251 N.W.2d 746 (N.D. 1977)
Dugas v. Felton , 249 N.W.2d 215 (N.D. 1976)
United Plainsmen v. N.D. State Water Conservation Comm'n , 247 N.W.2d 457 (N.D. 1976)
Kooker v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees , 246 N.W.2d 743 (N.D. 1976)
Vallejo v. Jamestown College , 244 N.W.2d 753 (N.D. 1976)
Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. State of North Dakota , 244 N.W.2d 708 (N.D. 1976)
Square Butte Electric Coop. v. Hilken , 244 N.W.2d 519 (N.D. 1976)
Eichenberger v. Wilhelm , 244 N.W.2d 691 (N.D. 1976)
First American Bank and Trust Co. v. Pfleger , 243 N.W.2d 165 (N.D. 1976)
Schumacher v. Schumacher , 242 N.W.2d 136 (N.D. 1976)
Walker v. Omdahl , 242 N.W.2d 649 (N.D. 1976)
Hoffman Motors v. Enockson , 240 N.W.2d 353 (N.D. 1976)
Rodgers v. Freborg , 240 N.W.2d 63 (N.D. 1976)
Stenehjem v. Sette , 240 N.W.2d 596 (N.D. 1976)
Small v. Burleigh County , 239 N.W.2d 823 (N.D. 1976)
First American Bank and Trust Co. v. George , 239 N.W.2d 284 (N.D. 1976)
Sayler v. Holstrom , 239 N.W.2d 276 (N.D. 1976)
State v. Stevens , 238 N.W.2d 251 (N.D. 1975)
Eakman v. Robb , 237 N.W.2d 423 (N.D. 1975)
State v. Stevens , 234 N.W.2d 623 (N.D. 1975)
Bellon v. Bellon , 237 N.W.2d 163 (N.D. 1975)
Hebron Brick Co. v. Robinson Brick and Tile Co. , 234 N.W.2d 250 (N.D. 1975)
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Hagen , 234 N.W.2d 841 (N.D. 1975)
Clairmont v. Hjelle , 234 N.W.2d 13 (N.D. 1975)
Hansen v. Dennis , 232 N.W.2d 49 (N.D. 1975)
Application of Bank of Rhame , 231 N.W.2d 801 (N.D. 1975)
DeForest v. DeForest , 228 N.W.2d 919 (N.D. 1975)
Mills v. Shoppers Charge Plan, Inc. , 231 N.W.2d 165 (N.D. 1975)
E.E. Bach Millwork Co. v. Meisner and Co. , 228 N.W.2d 904 (N.D. 1975)
Clairmont v. Burlington Northern , 229 N.W.2d 77 (N.D. 1975)
Giddings v. Giddings , 228 N.W.2d 915 (N.D. 1975)
State v. Nelson , 222 N.W.2d 383 (N.D. 1974)

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 09/05/2008