Herbert L. Meschke, Justice Lindell v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 1998 ND 174, 584 N.W.2d 520
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The disability verification requirements under N.D.C.C. 65-05-08.1(2)(a-d) (1995) apply to a claimant's initial request for disability benefits.
A physician's report under N.D.C.C. 65-05-08.1 (1995) includes a physician's formal correspondence with the Bureau, but not attached office notes or medical records.
Breding v. State , 1998 ND 170, 584 N.W.2d 493
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Defense counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to object to or attack the credibility of a prosecution witness's testimony on the ground the witness had used hypnosis to enhance his recall of events.
Trial strategy choices by defense counsel made after thorough investigation of the law and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable.
Swenson v. Raumin , 1998 ND 150, 583 N.W.2d 102
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The party seeking rescission of a settlement agreement under N.D.C.C. 9-09-04 has the burden of proving reasonable diligence to promptly rescind upon discovering facts entitling the party to rescind, as well as proving an offer to restore to the other contracting party everything of value received under the settlement agreement.
Gessner v. City of Minot , 1998 ND 157, 583 N.W.2d 90
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Service of a summons and complaint upon a city manager, instead of a member of the city's governing body, is insufficient to obtain personal jurisdiction over the city.
Codefendants are united in interest, for purposes of having service upon one constitute service upon the other, only when the two parties are in such relation to each other with regard to the subject matter of the plaintiff's action that they will fall or stand together, a judgment against one will result in liability upon the other, and neither can raise a defense which is unavailable to the other.
Genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment dismissal of claims a Water Management District was directly or vicariously liable for the drowning death of a child who fell from a flood control structure sponsored by the District.
Wilhelm v. Wilhelm , 1998 ND 140, 582 N.W.2d 6
(Joined in concurrence)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Trial court's valuation of in-kind income is not clearly erroneous where appellant presents no evidence to support her proposed valuation.
An equitable division of property need not be equal, but all of the real and personal property of the parties--including property accumulated prior to marriage or accumulated by one party through gift or inheritance--must be included in the marital estate before applying the Ruff-Fischer guidelines.
A trial court's decision regarding attorney fees will not be reversed absent an affirmative showing the trial court abused its discretion.
Fisher v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. , 1998 ND 109, 579 N.W.2d 599
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Coverage for damage to the flooring in a home arising out of the insured floor finisher's operations was not excluded by exclusions b or j in the insured's commercial general liability policy.
Exclusions k and l excluded from coverage the cost of the finish and the sanding and finishing work performed by the insured on the homeowner's flooring.
When an insured has been abandoned by its insurer and enters into a Miller-Shugart settlement agreement, a failure to delineate between covered and non-covered damages does not render the Miller-Shugart agreement totally unenforceable.
State v. Burckhard , 1998 ND 121, 579 N.W.2d 194
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Neither the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment nor N.D. Const. Art. I, Section 3, preclude the civil courts from assuming jurisdiction over the prosecution of theft charges against a Roman Catholic priest.
To withstand an Establishment Clause challenge, a statute must have a secular legislative purpose, its principle or primary effect must neither advance nor inhibit religion, and it must not foster an excessive entanglement with religion.
A motion to dismiss under N.D.R.Crim.P. 12(b) is not an appropriate vehicle to resolve fact questions, and all pleaded facts must be taken as true.
Hoyem v. ND Workers Comp. , 1998 ND 86, 578 N.W.2d 117
(Concurred in result)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Issues not raised before an administrative agency will not be considered for the first time on appeal.
Bureau's decision a claimant was not entitled to an impairment evaluation and rating for chronic pain and chronic pain syndrome was supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
Hanneman v. Continental Western Ins. Co. , 1998 ND 46, 575 N.W.2d 445
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The term "borrow" in an insurance contract means receiving something from another for one's own use.
Insured was not covered by insurance policy because insured was not a borrower of car.
Insurer had no duty to defend insured because insured was released from personal liability. Nor was insurer required to pay insured's attorneys fees and expenses because coverage was found not to apply.
Wahl v. Morton Co. Social Service Board , 1998 ND 48, 574 N.W.2d 859
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
In determining medicaid eligibility, the Department of Human Services' use of gross, rather than net, unearned income to compute the community spouse's resource allowance is a reasonable and appropriate application of the medicaid laws.
North Dakota, as a section 209(b) state, can use more restrictive medicaid eligibility requirements than are used under the supplemental security income program.
Delay in holding a fair hearing and providing an incomplete notice of hearing do not constitute reversible errors, absent a showing of substantial prejudice.
Judicial Vacancy in Southeast Judicial District , 1998 ND 25, 574 N.W.2d 199
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
District Judgeship No. 1 in the Chamber at Jamestown ordered abolished.
State v. Kitchen , 1997 ND 241, 572 N.W.2d 106
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
When the entryway to a home is impliedly open to use by the public, the residents have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the entryway.
Raboin v. N.D. Workers Compensation Bureau , 1997 ND 221, 571 N.W.2d 833
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
To impose personal liability on a corporate officer for an employer's failure to pay workers compensation premiums under N.D.C.C.  65-04-26.1, the officer must have supervisory control over the payment of premiums when payment is required.
Withey v. Hager , 1997 ND 225, 571 N.W.2d 142
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
A parent, bringing a motion to modify a child support obligation within two months after entry of an amended judgment continuing support at a rate set more than one year earlier, must demonstrate a material change of circumstance.
A trial court's modification of the parties' obligation for the children's medical expenses must be more than a year from the previous child support judgment, or requires a material change of circumstances.
Zimmerman v. Valdak Corp. , 1997 ND 203, 570 N.W.2d 204
(Joined in dissent)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The Workers' Compensation Act does not preclude a civil cause of action against an employer for true intentional injuries.
Dismissal of an employee's civil lawsuit against his employer is appropriate when there is no evidence to support a claim his employer had knowledge an injury was certain to occur.
City of Fargo v. Sivertson , 1997 ND 204, 571 N.W.2d 137
(Concurred in result)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
A police officer's approach to the defendant's vehicle stopped in driving lane behind accident scene and knock on driver's window to determine whether the driver was okay and why the driver was not proceeding in the left lane with other traffic constituted a permissible caretaker encounter and not a Fourth Amendment stop.
Sposato v. Sposato , 1997 ND 207, 570 N.W.2d 212
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Appeal from an order granting grandparent visitation in New York, the time period for which has expired, is dismissed as moot.
Absent a current request for visitation, the issue is not ripe for review.
Feist v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 1997 ND 177, 569 N.W.2d 1
(Concurred in result)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The administrative law judge's decision in this case was a recommendation and was not a final order. NDCC 28-32-13(3) authorizes, but does not require, the Workers Compensation Bureau to adopt rules for review of a hearing officer's recommendation. If an administrative agency rejects a hearing officer's recommendation, it must explain its rationale for not following the recommendation. Because AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (3rd ed.) was the edition in existence when NDCC 65-05-12 was amended and reenacted in 1989, the Bureau properly applied it when the claimant's impairment was evaluated in 1994. The Bureau was authorized to combine the impairment ratings for the claimant's lumbar and cervical impairments.
State v. Herrick , 1997 ND 155, 567 N.W.2d 336
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Trial court's order denying defendant's suppression motion is reversed and remanded. "No-knock" search warrant was issued merely because drugs might be present, in violation of Richards v. Wisconsin, 117 S.Ct. 1416 (1997). Remanded for consideration of whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule should be applied.
Reimche v. Reimche , 1997 ND 138, 566 N.W.2d 790
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
A continuance is the proper remedy for a party claiming unfair surprise. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of irregularity or surprise. The trial court's custody determination is not clearly erroneous.
Sowatzki v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 1997 ND 137, 567 N.W.2d 189
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
NDCC 28-32-21 only authorizes appeals to the Supreme Court from district court judgments in appeals from administrative agency orders. The question of the Bureau's authority to revoke a permanent partial impairment award and order repayment without first affording the claimant an opportunity to be heard, was a significant issue the district court should not have decided without complying with the provisions of NDCC Ch. 28-32.
Little v. Traynor , 1997 ND 128, 565 N.W.2d 766
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The Workers Compensation Bureau's adoption of an $85-per-hour maximum hourly rate and various fee caps to compensate a claimant's attorney in N.D.A.C.  92-01-02-11.1(1) and (3)(b) through (i) was based on an adequate administrative rulemaking record and was not an arbitrary or capricious application of its statutory authority. The Bureau's adoption in N.D.A.C.  92-01-02-11.1(9)(e) of a $100 limit for reimbursement of a claimant's reasonable and necessary costs, unless approved by the Bureau in advance of their accrual, was not beyond the scope of the Bureau's authority. The district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the Bureau to pay the nonadministrative parties' attorney fees under N.D.C.C.  28-32-21.1 for responding to the Bureau's motion for leave to pursue discovery of irrelevant material.
McArthur v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 1997 ND 105, 564 N.W.2d 655
(Concurred in result)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
An appeal from a notice of entry of judgment will be treated as an appeal from the judgment. An informal decision of the Workers Compensation Bureau is not appealable.
Hovland v. City of Grand Forks , 1997 ND 95, 563 N.W.2d 384
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Personal injury claim based on an in-line skating accident occurring on a public bike path was improperly dismissed on summary judgment. North Dakota's recreational use statute did not shield political subdivision from liability.
Service Oil, Inc., v. Chabot , 1997 ND 74, 562 N.W.2d 571
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
A motion denying summary judgment is not a ruling on the merits, and cannot be appealed. Although defendants stipulated to entry of judgment reserving the right to appeal the district court's ruling regarding liability, no such ruling has been made by the district court.
Steen v. Department of Human Services , 1997 ND 52, 562 N.W.2d 83
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Department's decision to terminate a personal service provider's status for five years was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Sanction, although harsh, was not an abuse of the Director's discretion.
Austin v. Towne , 1997 ND 59, 560 N.W.2d 895
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Motion under N.D.R.Civ.P. 59(j) was timely. Defendant was not entitled to credit on his child support arrearage for social security dependency payments.
State ex rel. Heitkamp v Family Life Services , 1997 ND 37, 560 N.W.2d 526
(Joined in dissent)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Individual whose First Amendment right to receive ministry is not adequately represented by existing defendants should have been allowed to intervene as a defendant in an action to dissolve two nonprofit corporations with charitable, educational, and religious purposes.
State ex rel. Heitkamp v Family Life Services , 1997 ND 37, 560 N.W.2d 526
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Individual whose First Amendment right to receive ministry is not adequately represented by existing defendants should have been allowed to intervene as a defendant in an action to dissolve two nonprofit corporations with charitable, educational, and religious purposes.
Huesers v. Huesers , 1997 ND 33, 560 N.W.2d 219
(Joined in concurrence)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Wife's non-violent behavior cannot be considered as mitigating factors in applying the domestic violence presumption.
Mangnall v. Adams , 1997 ND 19, 559 N.W.2d 221
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Where the parties' pleadings raised inextricably entwined issues about the relationship between a trustee's responsibilities and liabilities as trustee and as guardian to a ward who was a settlor of the trust, the trial court should have decided all of those issues in one proceeding.
State v. Kenner , 1997 ND 1, 559 N.W.2d 538
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
An officer must have a reasonable and articulable suspicion that a motorist has violated or is about to violate a law in order to legally stop a vehicle. Knowledge held by one officer can be imputed to another officer, but the first officer must have had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that a law has been or is about to be violated.
Interest of A. E. , 1997 ND 9, 559 N.W.2d 215
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Under N.D.C.C.  27-20-34(1)(c)(4)(b), the court must find there are reasonable grounds to believe that the juvenile is not amenable to treatment or rehabilitation as a juvenile in order to transfer a juvenile to district court for prosecution. Generally, the State bears the burden of persuasion that the juvenile is not amenable to treatment; however, N.D.C.C.  27-20-34(2) shifts the burden of persuasion to the child to show there are reasonable grounds to believe the child is amenable to treatment.
Wolf v. Wolf , 557 N.W.2d 742 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Trial court's award of child support was clearly erroneous under the child support guidelines because of inadequate findings regarding net monthly income. Spousal support award and property division were not clearly erroneous.
Estate of Opatz , 554 N.W.2d 813 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Under Section 30.1-10-01(4)(a), N.D.C.C., the right to renounce property is barred only by an encumbrance against the property created by the disclaimant, not a third-party.
Neither a judgment lien, nor service of a garnishment summons against a devisee created encumbrances which barred the devisee's right to renounce her interest in the devised property.
Ridl v. EP Operating Limited Partnership , 553 N.W.2d 784 (N.D. 1996)
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
An oil and gas lessee did not lose its interest in a 1973 lease when it failed to respond within 20 days of the lessor's notice, under Section 47-16-36, N.D.C.C., of termination of the lease.
The trial court properly ruled the lessor had not made an appropriate demand that the implied covenant of further development be complied with within a reasonable time.
Baldock v. Workers Comp. , 554 N.W.2d 441 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The rational basis standard of review applies to an equal protection challenge to the statutory scheme for rehabilitation benefits under the workers compensation law.
A workers compensation statute limiting rehabilitation retraining to the goal of returning an injured worker to a job paying at least seventy-five percent of the state average weekly wage did not violate equal protection rights of workers whose pre-injury earnings exceeded the statute's wage goal.
Swanson v. ND Workers Comp. , 553 N.W.2d 209 (N.D. 1996)
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The claimant did not have standing to challenge the Workers Compensation Bureau's claimed lack of a peer review system. Under Section 65-05-07(3), N.D.C.C., only doctors or health care providers may appeal adverse Bureau decisions on 'reasonableness of fees and payment denials for unjustified treatments.'
Jacobs v. Dept. of Corrections & Rehab. , 551 N.W.2d 779 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurred in result)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The State Personnel Board's finding that an employee was demoted for failing to complete his work in a timely manner and not in retaliation for protected activity was supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
Transystems Services v. Workers Comp. Burea , 550 N.W.2d 66 (N.D. 1996)
(Dissenting)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
An appeal from a decision of the Workers Compensation Bureau must be taken to the district court of the county where the injury occurred or the claimant resides. cause of child abuse under Chapter 50-25.1, N.D.C.C., is a 'contested case' under Section 28-32-01(4), N.D.C.C., and the Department of Human Services bears the burden of proof.
To support a finding of probable cause of child abuse under Chapter 50-25.1, N.D.C.C., there must be evidence of serious physical harm or traumatic abuse, evidenced by negative changes in the child's health resulting from infliction of physical or mental injury.
The court erred in awarding attorney's fees for the proceedings at the administrative level, because attorney's fees under Section 28-32-21.1(1), N.D.C.C., are authorized only for those proceedings necessitated by the Department's unjustified actions.
Raboin v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 552 N.W.2d 329 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
Chapter 28-32, N.D.C.C., authorizes an appeal to the district court from a Department of Human Services' finding of probable cause of child abuse or neglect.
The Department's determination there was probable cause of abuse by parents who used corporal punishment as a last resort to discipline their children was not supported by a preponderance of evidence. There was no evidence from which a reasonable person could conclude any of the children suffered serious physical harm or traumatic abuse as a result of the parental spankings.
Interest of C.R.M. , 552 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
Highlight of the Opinion of the Court:
The juvenile court did not err in ruling that the rules of evidence were inapplicable to a juvenile transfer proceeding, or in allowing a detective, who was cross-examined, to present hearsay testimony based upon information acquired in the course of his investigation.
The juvenile court did not err in finding probable cause to believe the juvenile assisted in committing an attempted robbery resulting in a person's death.
State v. Schneider , 550 N.W.2d 405 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurred in result)
Carlson v. Job Service , 548 N.W.2d 389 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurred in result)
Esselman v. Job Service ND , 548 N.W.2d 400 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurred in result)
Wheeler v. Wheeler , 548 N.W.2d 27 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring and dissenting)
State v. Glaesman , 545 N.W.2d 178 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring and dissenting)
State v. Jacobson , 545 N.W.2d 152 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
State v. O'Rourke , 544 N.W.2d 384 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurred in result)
State v. Barnett , 543 N.W.2d 774 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
State v. Sundquist , 542 N.W.2d 90 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurred in result)
Estate of Thorson , 541 N.W.2d 692 (N.D. 1996)
(Concurring)
Basin Electric Power Coop. v. ND Workers Comp., , 541 N.W.2d 685 (N.D. 1996)
(Dissenting)
Americana Healthcare Center v. Dept of Human Services , 540 N.W.2d 151 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurred in result)
Quamme v. Bellino, f/k/a Quamme , 540 N.W.2d 142 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
Olson v. City of Garrison , 539 N.W.2d 663 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
State v. Ova , 539 N.W.2d 857 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurred in result)
Cordie v. Tank , 538 N.W.2d 214 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Score v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. , 538 N.W.2d 206 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Van Dyke v. Van Dyke , 538 N.W.2d 197 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Reems v. St. Joseph's Hospital , 536 N.W.2d 666 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
ProServe Corp. v. Jamesetta N. Rainey , 536 N.W.2d 373 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
City of Fargo v. Hector , 534 N.W.2d 821 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
Pederson v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 534 N.W.2d 809 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurred in result)
Levey v. State Developmental Center , 533 N.W.2d 707 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
State v. Cox , 532 N.W.2d 384 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
Adoption of J.W.M. , 532 N.W.2d 372 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Hodek v. Greater Nelson County Consortium , 531 N.W.2d 280 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
Schuhmacher v. ND Hospital Assoc. , 528 N.W.2d 374 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
Adams County Record v. Greater North Dakota Association , 529 N.W.2d 830 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Krank v. Krank , 529 N.W.2d 844 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring)
Bickel v. Jackson , 530 N.W.2d 318 (N.D. 1995)
(Concurring and dissenting)
S.P.M. v. Department of Human Services , 529 N.W.2d 864 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Pamida, Inc. v. Meide , 526 N.W.2d 487 (N.D. 1995)
(Dissenting)
Estate of Krueger v. Richland Co. Social Services , 526 N.W.2d 456 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Svedberg v. Stamness , 525 N.W.2d 678 (N.D. 1994)
(Dissenting)
State v. Syring , 524 N.W.2d 97 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring and dissenting)
State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac , 522 N.W.2d 457 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Guardianship of Norman , 524 N.W.2d 358 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Guardianship of Norman , 524 N.W.2d 358 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Chaussee v. Thiel , 520 N.W.2d 789 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
State v. Brooks , 520 N.W.2d 796 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Fisher v. Schmeling , 520 N.W.2d 820 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurred in result)
Schatke v. Schatke , 520 N.W.2d 833 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Clooten v. Clooten , 520 N.W.2d 843 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurred in result)
Ollie v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 520 N.W.2d 233 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurred in result)
Brunner v. Ward Co. Social Services , 520 N.W.2d 228 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurred in result)
Rudh v. Rudh , 517 N.W.2d 632 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Haney v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 518 N.W.2d 195 (N.D. 1994)
(Dissenting)
Boeddeker v. Reel , 517 N.W.2d 407 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Industrial Commission v. McKenzie Co. National Bank , 518 N.W.2d 174 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurred in result)
Reisenauer v. Schaefer , 515 N.W.2d 152 (N.D. 1994)
(Concurring)
Ludwig v. Burchill , 514 N.W.2d 674 (N.D. 1994)
(Dissenting)
Rieniets v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 512 N.W.2d 708 (N.D. 1994)
(Dissenting)
BASF Corporation v. Symington , 512 N.W.2d 692 (N.D. 1994)
(Dissenting)
State v. Miller , 510 N.W.2d 638 (N.D. 1994)
(Dissenting)
Fisher v. Johnson , 508 N.W.2d 352 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Dvorak v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. , 508 N.W.2d 329 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurred in result)
B.H. v. K.D. , 506 N.W.2d 368 (N.D. 1993)
(Dissenting)
Berger v. State Personnel Board , 502 N.W.2d 539 (N.D. 1993)
(Dissenting)
State v. Steffes , 500 N.W.2d 608 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurring)
Rueckert v. Rueckert , 499 N.W.2d 863 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurring)
S.N.S. v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 499 N.W.2d 891 (N.D. 1993)
(Dissenting)
Cook v. Hansen , 499 N.W.2d 94 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurring)
SHector v. Metro Centers, Inc. , 498 N.W.2d 113 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurring)
Fibelstad v. Glaser , 497 N.W.2d 425 (N.D. 1993)
(Concurring)
Delorme v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 492 N.W.2d 585 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Finch v. Backes , 491 N.W.2d 705 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Delzer v. Winn , 491 N.W.2d 741 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Thompson v. ND Workers' Compensation Bureau , 490 N.W.2d 248 (N.D. 1992)
(Concurring)
Rassier v. Houim , 488 N.W.2d 635 (N.D. 1992)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Grotte v. ND Workers' Comp. Bureau , 489 N.W.2d 875 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. LaRoque , 486 N.W.2d 235 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Bergman v. Bergman , 486 N.W.2d 243 (N.D. 1992)
(Concurred in result)
State v. Birk , 484 N.W.2d 834 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Kiker v. Walters , 482 N.W.2d 626 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Rogers v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau , 482 N.W.2d 607 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
State v. Anderson , 480 N.W.2d 727 (N.D. 1992)
(Concurring)
United Bank of Bismarck v. Trout , 480 N.W.2d 742 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Spieker v. Westgo, Inc. , 479 N.W.2d 837 (N.D. 1992)
(Concurring)
Johnson v. Johnson , 480 N.W.2d 433 (N.D. 1992)
(Dissenting)
Hakanson v. ND Department of Human Services , 479 N.W.2d 809 (N.D. 1992)
(Concurring)
Oanes v. Westgo, Inc. , 476 N.W.2d 248 (N.D. 1991)
(Concurring and dissenting)
State v. Everson , 474 N.W.2d 695 (N.D. 1991)
(Concurring)
Zander v. Zander , 470 N.W.2d 603 (N.D. 1991)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Fries v. Fries , 470 N.W.2d 232 (N.D. 1991)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Wagner v. Backes , 470 N.W.2d 598 (N.D. 1991)
(Dissenting)
Leadbetter v. Rose , 467 N.W.2d 431 (N.D. 1991)
(Dissenting)
Thompson v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company , 466 N.W.2d 115 (N.D. 1991)
(Dissenting)
Brunsoman v. Scarlett , 465 N.W.2d 162 (N.D. 1991)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Byron's Construction Co. v. ND Department of Transportation , 463 N.W.2d 660 (N.D. 1990)
(Concurring)
Illies v. Illies , 462 N.W.2d 878 (N.D. 1990)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Glaspey v. Backes , 462 N.W.2d 635 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
Kopp v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 462 N.W.2d 132 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Wilson , 461 N.W.2d 105 (N.D. 1990)
(Concurring)
Harmon v. Mercy Hospital , 460 N.W.2d 404 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
State v. Wiedrich , 460 N.W.2d 680 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
Schloesser v. Larson , 458 N.W.2d 257 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
State v. Haugen , 458 N.W.2d 288 (N.D. 1990)
(Concurring)
City of Wahpeton v. Desjarlais , 458 N.W.2d 330 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
Lang v. Wonnenberg , 455 N.W.2d 832 (N.D. 1990)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Wheeler v. Schmid Laboratories, Inc. , 451 N.W.2d 133 (N.D. 1990)
(Dissenting)
Klem v. Greenwood , 450 N.W.2d 738 (N.D. 1990)
(Concurring)
Janavaras v. National Farmers Union Property and Casualty Company , 449 N.W.2d 578 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
Dinius v. Dinius , 448 N.W.2d 210 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Bader v. Bader , 448 N.W.2d 187 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Stonewood Hotel Corporation, Inc. v. Davis Development, Inc. , 447 N.W.2d 286 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
Risch v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 447 N.W.2d 308 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
Hayden v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 447 N.W.2d 489 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Smith v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 447 N.W.2d 250 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Club Broadway, Inc. v. Broadway Park , 443 N.W.2d 919 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Schill v. Langdon Farmers Union Oil Co. , 442 N.W.2d 408 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Peterson v. Zerr , 443 N.W.2d 293 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Kaloupek v. Burfening , 440 N.W.2d 496 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Van Inwagen v. Sanstead , 440 N.W.2d 513 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
State v. Sivesind , 439 N.W.2d 530 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
Johnson v. Peterbilt of Fargo, Inc. , 438 N.W.2d 162 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Holte v. ND State Highway Commissioner , 436 N.W.2d 250 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Grenz v. Kelsch , 436 N.W.2d 552 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. 1st Nationl Bk. & Trust , 440 N.W.2d 704 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
State v. Toman , 436 N.W.2d 10 (N.D. 1989)
(Dissenting)
Sargent County Bank v. Wentworth , 434 N.W.2d 562 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
United Accounts, Inc. v. Quackenbush , 434 N.W.2d 567 (N.D. 1989)
(Concurring)
Regstad v. Steffes , 433 N.W.2d 202 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring)
First National Bank & Trust v. Jacobsen , 431 N.W.2d 284 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring and dissenting)
State v. Schwalk , 430 N.W.2d 317 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Howes v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 429 N.W.2d 730 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
Johnson v. ND Workers Compensation Bureau , 428 N.W.2d 514 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring)
State v. Melin , 428 N.W.2d 227 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
State v. Dagley , 430 N.W.2d 63 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
Dickinson Public School v. Sanstead , 425 N.W.2d 906 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring)
State v. Wright , 426 N.W.2d 3 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
State v. Nygaard , 426 N.W.2d 547 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
State v. Falconer , 426 N.W.2d 10 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurred in result)
State v. Welch , 426 N.W.2d 550 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurred in result)
State v. Anderson , 427 N.W.2d 316 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
City of Minot v. Freelander , 426 N.W.2d 556 (N.D. 1988)
(Dissenting)
Estate of Stuckle , 427 N.W.2d 96 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring)
Dosland v. Netland , 424 N.W.2d 141 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurred in result)
State v. Hogie , 424 N.W.2d 630 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurred in result)
Olson v. Fraase , 421 N.W.2d 820 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Bellemare v. Gateway Builders, Inc. , 420 N.W.2d 733 (N.D. 1988)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Eldridge v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society , 417 N.W.2d 797 (N.D. 1987)
(Dissenting)
Fastow v. Burleigh County Water Resource District , 415 N.W.2d 505 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurred in result)
North Valley Water Association, Inc. v. Northern Improvement Company , 415 N.W.2d 492 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurred in result)
St. John Public School Dist. No. 3 v. Engineers-Architects, P.C. , 414 N.W.2d 285 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Estate of Sorensen , 411 N.W.2d 362 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurring)
Boyko v. ND Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 409 N.W.2d 638 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurring)
State v. Reil , 409 N.W.2d 99 (N.D. 1987)
(Dissenting)
Sadler v. Basin Electric Power Cooperative , 409 N.W.2d 87 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurred in result)
Waith v. ND Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 409 N.W.2d 94 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurred in result)
Imperial Oil v. Industrial Commission , 406 N.W.2d 700 (N.D. 1987)
(Dissenting)
Volk v. Volk , 404 N.W.2d 495 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Farmland Mutual Ins. Co. v. Farmers Elevator, Inc. , 404 N.W.2d 473 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurring)
McRae v. Carbno , 404 N.W.2d 508 (N.D. 1987)
(Dissenting)
Hennum v. City of Medina , 402 N.W.2d 327 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurred in result)
S.H. v. Petersen , 401 N.W.2d 694 (N.D. 1987)
(Dissenting)
Vande Hoven v. Vande Hoven , 399 N.W.2d 855 (N.D. 1987)
(Concurring)
Bailey v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc. , 398 N.W.2d 120 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurred in result)
Dickinson Air Service, Inc. v. Kadrmas , 397 N.W.2d 55 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
Grace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation Bureau , 395 N.W.2d 576 (N.D. 1986)
(Dissenting)
Blueshield v. Job Service North Dakota , 392 N.W.2d 70 (N.D. 1986)
(Dissenting)
R & D Amusement Corporation v. Christianson , 392 N.W.2d 385 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
Johnson v. Hamill , 392 N.W.2d 55 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
Ranta v. McCarney , 391 N.W.2d 161 (N.D. 1986)
(Dissenting)
Interest of L.D.R.T. , 391 N.W.2d 594 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurred in result)
Dennis v. Dennis , 387 N.W.2d 234 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
Minot Farmers Elevator v. Conrad , 386 N.W.2d 463 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
State v. Kingsley , 383 N.W.2d 828 (N.D. 1986)
(Joined in concurrence)
Erickson v. Erickson , 384 N.W.2d 659 (N.D. 1986)
(Joined in concurrence)
Olmstead v. Miller , 383 N.W.2d 817 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring and dissenting)
Schirado v. North Dakota State Highway Commissioner , 382 N.W.2d 391 (N.D. 1986)
(Dissenting)
Estate of Vertin , 381 N.W.2d 199 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
State v. Fontaine , 382 N.W.2d 374 (N.D. 1986)
(Concurring)
Sonterre v. Job Service , 379 N.W.2d 281 (N.D. 1985)
(Joined in concurrence)
Jablonsky v. Klemm , 377 N.W.2d 560 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring)
Dakota Bank & Trust Co. v. Brakke , 377 N.W.2d 553 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring)
S.M.B. v. G.G. , 376 N.W.2d 27 (N.D. 1985)
(Joined in dissent)
State v. Tibor , 373 N.W.2d 877 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring)
D.G. Porter, Inc. v. Fridley , 373 N.W.2d 917 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring and dissenting)
State v. Tininenko , 371 N.W.2d 762 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring)
Patten v. Green , 369 N.W.2d 105 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring)
Moser v. North Dakota Highway Commissioner , 369 N.W.2d 650 (N.D. 1985)
(Dissenting)
State v. Presbuch , 366 N.W.2d 794 (N.D. 1985)
(Dissenting)
Dennis v. Dennis , 366 N.W.2d 474 (N.D. 1985)
(Concurring)
Patzer v. Glaser , 355 N.W.2d 798 (N.D. 1984)
(Joined in dissent)

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 10/10/2008