State v. Bouck
, 2001 ND 153,
633 N.W.2d 163
When the law prescribes a place of imprisonment to which a convicted defendant can be sentenced, the court cannot direct a different place of incarceration, and, if it does, the sentence is void and the defendant is entitled to resentencing.
State v. Rieger
, 1997 ND 86,
592 N.W.2d 923
The trial court's order revoking defendant's probation and
sentencing him to thirty days incarceration affirmed under
N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
State v. Zahn
, 1997 ND 65,
562 N.W.2d 737
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding Zahn in
contempt, because Zahn disobeyed a court order after being warned
of possible contempt charges, and Zahn's conduct impaired the
respect due the court.
City of Grand Forks v. Dohman
,
552 N.W.2d 69 (N.D. 1996)
The district court did not abuse its discretion by
summarily imposing a punitive contempt sanction in response to
contemptuous remarks made by defendant to the jury.
State v. Mertz
,
514 N.W.2d 662 (N.D. 1994)
State v. Yagow
,
423 N.W.2d 804 (N.D. 1988)
LePera v. Snider
,
240 N.W.2d 862 (N.D. 1976)
State v. Heasley
,
180 N.W.2d 242 (N.D. 1970)
State v. Heath
,
177 N.W.2d 751 (N.D. 1970)