<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Hamilton, v. Woll</title>
<link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/docket/20120269.htm</link>
<description>Docket feed from the North Dakota Supreme Court</description>

<item>
<title>70 01/03/2013   MANDATE</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:00:70 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>69 11/28/2012   Judgment Sent to Parties</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:00:69 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>68 11/27/2012   Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:00:68 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>67 11/27/2012   Concurring Specially: Crothers, Daniel John:  CONCUR</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:00:67 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>66 11/27/2012   SPLIT OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:00:66 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>65 11/27/2012   DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:00:65 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>64 11/26/2012   Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:64 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>63 11/26/2012   Envelope addressed to Jacki DeMay with letter dated 8-24-12 returned with notation "Return to</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:00:63 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>62 10/09/2012     Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:00:62 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>61 10/09/2012   Envelope addressed to Jacki DeMay with letter dated 9-26-12 returned with notation "Return to</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:00:61 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>60 10/08/2012   ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED 10/5/12 (ENTRY NOS.129-132,134)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:00:60 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>59 10/08/2012   ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:00:59 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>58 10/08/2012   ARGUED: Lautt/Maus</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:00:58 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>57 10/08/2012   APPEARANCES: Steven Lautt and Scott Knudsvig/Michael Maus</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:00:57 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>56 10/05/2012    notation "return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:00:56 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>55 10/05/2012   Envelopes addressed to Jacki DeMay with letters dated 9/17/12, 9/20/12, 9/21/12 returned with</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:00:55 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>54 10/04/2012   RECEIVED 7 COPIES OF RYB FROM CENTRAL DUPLICATING</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:00:54 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>53 10/03/2012   Received non-substantive changes to RYB</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:00:53 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>52 10/02/2012   E-FILED BRIEF (PDF)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:00:52 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>51 10/02/2012   REPLY BRIEF (PDF)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Oct 2012 12:00:51 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>50 09/27/2012   ELEC. SUPP. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED September 26, 2012 (ENTRY NOS. 117-128)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:00:50 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>49 09/28/2012   Rec'd 7 copies of AEB of Gleason, Bragg &amp; McKinley from CSD</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:00:49 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>48 09/26/2012   Rec'd nonsubstantive corrected brief of Appellees Gleason, Bragg, &amp; McKinley)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:00:48 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>47 09/25/2012   Rec'd $25 surcharge for AEB of Gleason, Bragg &amp; McKinley. (Receipt #21512)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:00:47 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>46 09/24/2012   E-FILED BRIEF</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:00:46 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>45 09/24/2012   APPELLEE BRIEF (Gleason, Bragg &amp; McKinley)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:00:45 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>44 09/24/2012   Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (Hamilton &amp; Casper) from CSD</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:00:44 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>43 09/20/2012   Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #21500)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:00:43 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>42 09/20/2012   Order of Remand Sent to Parties</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:00:42 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>41 09/20/2012   ORDER OF REMAND</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:00:41 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>40 09/20/2012   ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE. Granted</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:00:40 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>39 09/19/2012   E-FILED BRIEF</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:00:39 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>38 09/19/2012   APPELLEE BRIEF (Lawrence Hamilton, Philip Hamilton &amp; Judy Casper)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:00:38 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>37 09/18/2012   Envelope addressed to Walter Opper returned "Attempted- Not Known - Unable to Forward" (oa letter)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:00:37 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>36 09/17/2012   MOTION to Seek Leave of Court to Amend Amended Judgment &amp; Brief in Support</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:00:36 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>35 09/17/2012   NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:00:35 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>34 09/05/2012    Not Known, Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:00:34 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>33 09/05/2012   Envelope addressed to Dakota West Energy, LLC, returned with notation "Return to Sender, Attempted</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:00:33 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>32 09/05/2012    as Addressed, Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:00:32 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>31 09/05/2012   Envelope addressed to Lloyd S. Schattyn returned with notation "Return to Sender, Not Deliverable</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:00:31 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>30 09/05/2012    Address, Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:00:30 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>29 09/05/2012   Envelope addressed to Margaret J. Hannifin returned with notation "Return to Sender, Insufficient</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:00:29 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>28 08/28/2012   Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:00:28 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>27 08/28/2012   Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:00:27 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>26 08/22/2012   Received $117 surcharge for ATB and ATA (receipt #21459)</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:00:26 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>25 08/20/2012   E-FILED APPENDIX</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:00:25 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>24 08/20/2012   APPELLANT APPENDIX</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:00:24 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>23 08/20/2012   E-FILED BRIEF</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:00:23 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>22 08/20/2012   APPELLANT BRIEF</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:00:22 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>21 08/16/2012     returned as "Return to Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:00:21 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>20 08/16/2012   6-29-12 ltr addressed to Peyton H. Wol &amp; Dana G. Woll, Trustees of Peyton Woll, Jr. Trust was</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:00:20 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>19 08/16/2012     returned as "Return to Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:00:19 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>18 08/16/2012   6-26-12 ltr addressed to Peyton H. Woll &amp; Dana G. Woll, Trustees of Peyton Woll, Jr. Trust was</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:00:18 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>17 08/02/2012   "Return to Send, Attempted, Not Known, Unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:00:17 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>16 08/02/2012   7-10-12 ltr addressed to Peyton Woll &amp; Dana Woll was returned with notation</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2012 12:00:16 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>15 07/13/2012   unable to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:00:15 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>14 07/13/2012   6/29/12 ltr addressed to Alan R. Hannifin returned with the notation"Return to Sender, Vacant,</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:00:14 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>13 07/09/2012      81-97; &amp; 99-116</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:00:13 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>12 07/09/2012   ELEC. RECORD ON APPEAL DATED July 6, 2012 (ENTRY NOS. 1-14; 16-37; 39-47; 49-72; 75-79;</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:00:12 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>11 07/05/2012     to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:00:11 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>10 07/05/2012   Rapp Trust, were returned with notation "Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:00:10 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>9 07/05/2012   Envelopes addressed to Frances A. Hannifin, Alan R. Hannifin, &amp; Helen F. Rapp, Trustee of Helen F.</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:00:09 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>8 07/02/2012     to Forward"</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:00:08 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>7 07/02/2012   Envelope addressed to Julie K. McKinley returned with notation "Return to Sender, Vacant, Unable</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:00:07 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>6 06/29/2012   ACTION BY CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK. Granted: 08/20/2012</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:00:06 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>5 06/29/2012   E-FILED MOTION</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:00:05 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>4 06/29/2012   MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 12:00:04 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>3 06/25/2012   List of defendant addresses from Michael J. Maus</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:00:03 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>2 06/25/2012   Letter from Michael J. Maus dated 6-25-2012 re: He will be representing plaintiffs</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:00:02 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>1 06/11/2012   NOTICE OF APPEAL: 06/11/2012</title>
<description>
Hamilton, v. Woll - 20120269
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:00:01 CDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>