<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?> 
 <rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
 <title>North Dakota Supreme Court Opinions</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/Search/Opinions.asp</link> 
 <description>Opinions from the North Dakota Supreme Court</description> 
  
 <item> 
 <title>Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson, 2012 ND 92</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20120130.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 Lawyer suspension ordered. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 16:32:40 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Come Big or Stay Home, LLC v. EOG Resources, Inc., 2012 ND 91</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110305.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 An agreement may be supplemented by custom or usage, under appropriate circumstances<br /> 
 Pooling and unitization of separately owned tracts do not create a cotenancy between the several leaseholders.<br /> 
 When a claim for conversion and a claim for breach of contract arise under the same facts, tort liability for conversion does not occur unless the conduct that constitutes a breach of contract also gives rise to liability independent of the existence 
 of a contract between the parties. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Fri, 4 May 2012 14:43:48 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Pifer v. McDermott, 2012 ND 90</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110287.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 A partial judgment that disposes of fewer than all claims against all parties will not be considered on appeal absent N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification.<br /> 
 On appeal, the appropriateness of N.D.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification is reviewed. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Fri, 4 May 2012 14:43:48 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Raymond J. German, Ltd. v. Brossart, 2012 ND 89</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110338.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 When a default judgment, rather than a district court's order regarding a N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to vacate the default judgment, is appealed, it is reviewed to determine whether irregularities appear on the face of the judgment.<br /> 
 District courts have broad discretion in the quality of proof necessary for entering a default judgment.<br /> 
 An appearance is any response sufficient to give a plaintiff or his or her attorney notice of an intent to contest the claim. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Lynch v. The New Public School District No. 8, 2012 ND 88</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110109.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 Although a teacher who does not receive a notice of nonrenewal is entitled to an offer of reemployment under the same terms and conditions as the current contract, the teacher does not have a right to an identical contract with identical duties and 
 assignments as the current year.<br /> 
 A teacher's right to an offer of reemployment is the right to continued employment in the district in a position for which the teacher is qualified, not the right to teach at a particular school or a particular grade level.<br /> 
 A notice of nonrenewal is required when a change in a teacher's assigned curricular duties is coupled with a severe reduction in salary; however, incidental financial or time consequences of a reassignment, including extra travel expenses and travel 
 time, do not trigger the right to a notice of nonrenewal. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Johnson v. WSI, 2012 ND 87</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110262.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 To receive WSI benefits, a claimant must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, a compensable injury was suffered.<br /> 
 The definition of "compensable injury" excludes preexisting injuries unless the employment substantially accelerated or substantially worsened an injury's severity.<br /> 
 A compensable injury does not exist when a claimant's employment merely triggered symptoms of a preexisting injury.<br /> 
 When an employee cannot be returned to substantial gainful employment under the hierarchy of options in section 65-05.1-01(4), N.D.C.C., but meets the income test under section 65-05.1-01(6)(a)(3), N.D.C.C., the employee has a retained earnings 
 capacity and is entitled to partial disability benefits. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Vining v. Renton, 2012 ND 86</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110233.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 When considering modification of primary residential responsibility, a district court must gauge the best interests of the child factors against the backdrop of the stability of the child's relationship with the custodial parent.<br /> 
 Cases that are "close calls" may result in a change of primary residential responsibility when other considerations are weightier than the custodial stability factor.<br /> 
 Although a change of primary residential responsibility is legally permissible without resorting to other remedies, that result should be a rare event rather than the first choice. 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Pelzl v. State, 2012 ND 85</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110364.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 Judgment summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Tibor v. State, 2012 ND 84</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110313.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 Order dismissing application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6). 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 <item> 
 <title>Harmon v. State, 2012 ND 83</title> 
 <link>http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110343.htm</link> 
 <description> 
 A district court order summarily dismissing a petition for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). 
 </description> 
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 May 2012 14:34:44 CDT</pubDate> 
 </item> 
 </channel> 
 </rss>

