<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments</link><description>Arguments</description><item><title>The United States Supreme Court will conduct oral arguments next week with one Justice missing and an empty courtroom</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/the-united-states-supreme-court-will-conduct-oral-arguments-next-week-with-one-justice-missing-and-an-empty-courtroom</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The United States Supreme Court will conduct oral arguments next week with one Justice missing and an empty courtroom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died on September 18, 2020, and her passing will leave the Court with 8 Justices when their term begins on October 5. The Court&amp;rsquo;s public statement announcing her death was posted on their website.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_09-18-20"&gt;https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_09-18-20&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Traditionally, the courtroom and the Justice&amp;rsquo;s chair are draped in black following the death of a sitting justice.&amp;nbsp; This honor and tradition is being observed now, even though the United States Supreme Court building is closed to the public.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_09-20-20"&gt;https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/pr_09-20-20&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Out of concern for the health and safety of the public and Supreme Court employees, the Supreme Court building is closed to the public until further notice. The building remains open for official business. Oral arguments for October will be conducted via telephone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Court holds oral argument in about 70-80 cases each year. The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oral arguments are generally scheduled on specified Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday mornings beginning on the first Monday in October, and continuing through the end of April. Typically, the Court holds two arguments each day beginning at 10:00 a.m., each lasting one hour.&amp;nbsp; The Court&amp;rsquo;s oral argument schedule is available through this link.&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2020TermCourtCalendar.pdf"&gt;https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2020TermCourtCalendar.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The days on which arguments are held are identified on the Court&amp;rsquo;s yearly calendar. The specific cases to be argued each day, and the attorneys scheduled to argue them, are identified on hearing lists for each session and on the day call for each argument session. The United States Supreme Court building usually is open to the public and, when open, courtroom seating is available on a first-come, first seated basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the afternoon of each argument, the Court posts transcripts of that day&amp;rsquo;s arguments. On the Friday of each argument week, the Court also makes the audio of the week&amp;rsquo;s arguments available.&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/the-united-states-supreme-court-will-conduct-oral-arguments-next-week-with-one-justice-missing-and-an-empty-courtroom</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court March 4 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-march-4-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in a consolidated case on standing to challenge health and safety regulations relating to abortion clinics.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;June Medical Serv. v. Russo&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/russo-v-june-medical-services-llc/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/russo-v-june-medical-services-llc/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-march-4-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court March 3 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-march-3-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case on the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and a Securities and Exchange Commission case on equitable relief.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class="buttoncolumn"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="casenamecolumn"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_MainEditable_rptOralArgumentDays_ctl02_rptOralArgumentDay_ctl00_lblText"&gt;Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Protection Bureau&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/seila-law-llc-v-consumer-financial-protection-bureau/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/seila-law-llc-v-consumer-financial-protection-bureau/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="casenamecolumn"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="casenamecolumn"&gt;
&lt;div class="buttoncolumn"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_MainEditable_rptOralArgumentDays_ctl02_rptOralArgumentDay_ctl01_lblText"&gt;Liu v. SEC&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/liu-v-securities-and-exchange-commission/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/liu-v-securities-and-exchange-commission/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-march-3-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court March 2 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-march-2-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case involving a denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture and a case on whether asylum-seekers may challenge mistakes made during the expedited removal process.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Nasrallah v. Barr&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/nasrallah-v-barr/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/nasrallah-v-barr/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/department-of-homeland-security-v-thuraissigiam/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/department-of-homeland-security-v-thuraissigiam/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-march-2-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 21 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-jan-21-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on the definition of &amp;ldquo;serious drug offense&amp;rdquo; and a case involving arbitration requires for an international commercial dispute.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Shular v. United States&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shular-v-united-states/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shular-v-united-states/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS v. Outokumpu Stainless&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ge-energy-power-conversion-france-sas-v-outokumpu-stainless-usa-llc/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ge-energy-power-conversion-france-sas-v-outokumpu-stainless-usa-llc/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-jan-21-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 15 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-jan-15-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on age discrimination in employment.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Babb v. Wilkie&lt;/em&gt; case details:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/babb-v-wilkie/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/babb-v-wilkie/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-jan-15-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Jan. 13 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-jan-13-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Monday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on whether preclusion principles can bar a defendant from raising defenses that were not actually litigated and resolved in a prior case and in a retirement plan case involving breach of fiduciary duty.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashion Group Inc.&lt;/em&gt; case details:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lucky-brand-dungarees-inc-v-marcel-fashion-group-inc/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lucky-brand-dungarees-inc-v-marcel-fashion-group-inc/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.&lt;/em&gt; case details:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/thole-v-u-s-bank-n-a/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/thole-v-u-s-bank-n-a/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-jan-13-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 11 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-11-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a death penalty case involving the review of sentencing errors and an international custody case in which the mother removed the child to the United States.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;McKinney v. Arizona&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1109" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1109&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Monasky v. Taglieri&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-935" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-935&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-11-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 10 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-10-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in an Affordable Care Act case involving payments to insurance companies and a case on whether a criminal defendant is required to formally object after being sentenced in order to receive reasonableness review on appeal.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Maine Community Health Options v. United States &lt;/span&gt;case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1023" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1023&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Holguin-Hernandez v. United States&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-7739" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-7739&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-10-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 9 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-9-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Monday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on motions to reopen deportation proceedings and a case involving legal interpretations by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-776" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-776&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Thryv, Inc. v. Click-To-Call Technologies&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-916" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-916&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-9-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 4 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-4-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on the limitations period for a breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA and a death penalty case involving what constitutes a second or successive habeas application.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma &lt;/span&gt;case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1116" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1116&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Banister v. Davis &lt;/span&gt;case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-6943" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-6943&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-4-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 3 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-3-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on whether the federal &amp;ldquo;Superfund&amp;rdquo; Act prevents property owners from seeking restoration damages under state law and a case on whether state law or federal common law principles govern the ownership of a tax refund paid to a corporation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian &lt;/span&gt;case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/17-1498" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/17-1498&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1269" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1269&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-3-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 2 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-2-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Monday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case involving copyrighting of works by government officials and a case on whether New York City&amp;rsquo;s ban on transporting a licensed handgun to a location outside of the City is unconstitutional.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;State of Georgia, et al. v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1150" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1150&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;New York State Rifle &amp;amp; Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-280" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-280&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 07:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-dec-2-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 13 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-13-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a racial discrimination case and a case on whether an order denying a motion for relief from the automatic stay in a bankruptcy proceeding is a final order.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-Owned Media&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1171" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1171&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-938" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-938&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-13-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 6 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-6-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case involving disclosure requirements for retirement plan fiduciaries and in a Clean Water Act case from Hawaii.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander &lt;/span&gt;case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1165" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1165&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund&lt;/span&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-260" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-260&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-6-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 5 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-5-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a ship chartering case and in a case involving the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-565" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-565&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Allen v. Cooper&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-877" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-877&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-5-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Nov. 4 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-4-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Monday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on whether a police officer can pull over a vehicle merely because its registered owner has a suspended driver&amp;rsquo;s license and a case on cancellation of removal of a lawful permanent resident.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kansas v. Glover&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-556" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-556&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Barton v. Barr&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-725" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-725&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-nov-4-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Oct. 16 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-oct-16-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court hears arguments in a case on state prosecution based on information on immigration forms, a case on life imprisonment without parole for juvenile offenders, and a case on whether the &amp;ldquo;discovery rule&amp;rdquo; applies to toll the statute of limitations in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kansas v. Garcia&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/17-834" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/17-834&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mathena v. Malvo&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-217" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-217&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rotkiske v. Klemm&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-328" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-328&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-oct-16-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Oct. 15 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-oct-15-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in case on whether members of the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico are officers of the United States subject to the Appointments Clause.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment&lt;/em&gt; case information:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1334" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-1334&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-oct-15-arguments</guid></item><item><title>U.S. Supreme Court Oct. 8 arguments</title><link>https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-oct-8-arguments</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #000120;" color="#000120"&gt;Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases involving employment discrimination related to employee sexual orientation or gender identity.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bostock v. Clayton County&lt;/em&gt; preview:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/17-1618" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/17-1618&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission&lt;/em&gt; preview:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-107" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-107&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 13:56:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.ndcourts.gov:443/news/federal-courts/us-supreme-court/arguments/u-s-supreme-court-oct-8-arguments</guid></item></channel></rss>