Riemers v. O'Halloran, et al.
Docket No. 20030280
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, January 6, 2004 4:00pm
Docket Info
- Title
- Roland C. Riemers, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Thomas J. O'Halloran, Buckhoff &
O'Halloran & Associates, LLP, Defendants and Appellees - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 03-C-00299
Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Karen Kosanda Braaten
2004 ND 79678 N.W.2d 547
Highlight
A party waives an issue by not providing supporting argument, and without supportive reasoning or citations to relevant authorities, an argument is without merit.
Court-appointed expert witnesses are absolutely immune from suit on the basis of their testimony.
An appeal is frivolous if it is flagrantly groundless, devoid of merit, or demonstrates persistence in the course of litigation which could be seen as evidence of bad faith.
Counsel
There are no counsel to show.(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 09/24/2003 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 09/22/2003 | |
2 | 10/15/2003 | Plaintiff's Rule 11 Answer w/cover letter dated 10-13-03 | |
3 | 10/20/2003 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
4 | 10/29/2003 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
5 | 10/29/2003 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
6 | 10/30/2003 | DISK - ATB | |
7 | 11/04/2003 | Copies of Order appealed from & TOC for Appellant's Appendix - inserted | |
8 | 11/03/2003 | Transcript dated May 28, 2003 | |
9 | 11/04/2003 | DISK - TRA of May 28, 2003 | |
10 | 11/24/2003 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
11 | 11/24/2003 | APPELLEE APPENDIX | |
12 | 11/25/2003 | DISK - AEB | |
13 | 12/05/2003 | RULE 11 MOTION (filed under N.D.R.App.P. 38), Affidavit of Thomas O'Halloran & Aff. Service - RspDue : 12/15/2003 | |
14 | 12/08/2003 | REPLY BRIEF of Appellant | View |
15 | 12/08/2003 | DISK - RYB | |
16 | 12/08/2003 | Response to Rule 11 Motion (Part of "Appellant's Petition for Lawyer Sanctions" | |
17 | 12/08/2003 | Appellant's Petition for Lawyer Sanctions - RspDue : 12/19/2003 | |
18 | 12/10/2003 | Appellant's Brief Opposing Rule 11 Motion | |
19 | 12/17/2003 | NO ACTION TAKEN (Rule 11 Motion to be heard with the merits) | |
20 | 12/17/2003 | Motion (Petition for Lawyer Sanctions) to be heard with the merits | |
21 | 12/31/2003 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | |
22 | 01/06/2004 | APPEARANCES: submitted to the court under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(2) | |
23 | 01/06/2004 | ARGUED: submitted to the court under N.D.R.App.P. 34(a)(2) (Vol. Y; Page 193) | |
24 | 04/13/2004 | DISPOSITION | |
25 | 04/13/2004 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Neumann, William A. | View |
26 | 04/13/2004 | Costs on appeal awarded in favor of the Appellees | |
27 | 04/14/2004 | Judgment Mailed to Parties | |
28 | 04/20/2004 | Notice of Entry of Judgment, with attachment, & Affid. of Service by Mail from Michael L. Gjesdahl | |
29 | 04/26/2004 | PETITION FOR REHEARING and Addendum | View |
30 | 04/26/2004 | DISK - PER (e-mailed) | |
31 | 05/03/2004 | DISK - ADDENDUM TO PER (E-MAILED) | |
32 | 05/05/2004 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER) - Denied | |
33 | 05/19/2004 | MANDATE | |
34 | 11/30/2010 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
35 | 11/30/2010 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |