Opinions
1 - 10 of 11084 results
|
Morales v. Weatherford U.S., et al.
|
|
State v. Williams
Highlight: A criminal judgment for attempted murder and conspiracy to commit murder is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
|
Interest of Skorick
Highlight: A district court must have sufficient factual findings to show a sexually dangerous individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. Past conduct is relevant and may be considered with present conduct to determine if an individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. Failure to attend treatment might demonstrate inability to control behavior just as violation of other institutional rules. The district court's findings are sufficient to show the individual continues to have an inability to control his behavior. |
|
Zander, et al. v. Morsette
Highlight: The district court controls the scope and substance of opening and closing arguments, and a district court's decision will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. |
|
State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230383-20230385)
Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382, 20230384, & 20230385)
Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382, 20230383, & 20230385)
Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Heintz (consolidated w/ 20230382-20230384)
Highlight: Orders for revocation of probation are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
State v. Pederson
Highlight: Case Highlight : To succeed in a challenge under Brady, the defendant must demonstrate the evidence was favorable to the defendant or plainly exculpatory. |
|
Field v. Field, et al.
Highlight: Under Rule 30(a), N.D.R.App.P., a party's references to evidence in any document on appeal must cite to items in the record. This Court does not consider documents that are not in the certified record. After an initial custody decision has been made, parenting time modifications are governed by N.D.C.C. § 14-05-22(2) and by standards set forth in caselaw. A parenting plan must include a provision on decision making responsibility under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-30(2)(a), and that responsibility must be allocated in the best interests of the child, N.D.C.C. § 14-09-31(2). A district court's decision on parenting time and decision making responsibility is a finding of fact subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. |