State v. Poitra
Docket No. 20090339
Oral Argument:
Thursday, April 8, 2010 1:30pm
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Joshua John Poitra, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 08-K-02762
East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Georgia Dawson
2010 ND 137785 N.W.2d 225
Oral Argument
4/8/2010
Highlight
A defendant claiming statements in an affidavit for a search warrant are false or misleading because important information was omitted must show: (1) law enforcement omitted facts with the intent or in reckless disregard of whether they made the affidavit misleading, and (2) the affidavit would not have been sufficient to support a finding of probable cause if the omitted information had been included.
A juvenile does not have a statutory right to have an attorney present when a search warrant is executed.
A person cannot take advantage of his own wrong.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 11/05/2009 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 11/04/2009 | |
2 | 11/05/2009 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 11/04/2009 | |
3 | 12/01/2009 | TRANSCRIPT DATED 7/15/08; 7/16/08; 8/14/08; 11/5/08; 1/28/09; 2/25/09; 7/6/09; 7/7/09; | |
4 | 12/01/2009 | 7/8/09; 7/9/09; 7/10/09; and 10/26/09 & C.O.S. | |
5 | 12/01/2009 | DISK (e-mailed) - Transcripts dated 7/15/08; 7/16/08; 8/14/08; 11/5/08; 1/28/09; 2/25/09; 7/6/09; | |
6 | 12/01/2009 | 7/7/09; 7/8/09; 7/9/09; 7/10/09; and 10/26/09 | |
7 | 12/10/2009 | RECORD ON APPEAL and Separates No. 36 - 38. Not sent - Nos. 5, 10, 21, 26, 29, 35, 105, 107, 111, | |
8 | 12/10/2009 | (Steno notes and Tapes), Nos. 117 (Exh 4 Cap), 118 (Exh 5 Evidence Kit) | |
9 | 01/05/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
10 | 01/05/2010 | E-FILED MOTION (mat) | |
11 | 01/05/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK (mat) - Granted : 01/20/2010 | |
12 | 01/18/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (letter form) | |
13 | 01/18/2010 | E-FILED MOTION - MAT | |
14 | 01/19/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK - MAT - Granted : 02/10/2010 | |
15 | 01/22/2010 | APPELLANT BRIEF (E-filed) | View |
16 | 01/22/2010 | E-FILED BRIEF (atb) | |
17 | 01/22/2010 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (E-FILED) | |
18 | 01/22/2010 | E-FILED APPENDIX - ATA | |
19 | 01/26/2010 | Received $25 surcharge for ATB (Receipt #19321) | |
20 | 02/02/2010 | Received copies of ATB from CSD | |
21 | 02/02/2010 | Received copies of ATA from CSD | |
22 | 02/17/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
23 | 02/17/2010 | E-FILED MOTION - MAE | |
24 | 02/17/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK - MAE - Granted : 03/12/2010 | |
25 | 03/12/2010 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
26 | 03/12/2010 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
27 | 03/19/2010 | Received $25 e-filing surcharge for AEB (Receipt #19404). | |
28 | 03/22/2010 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
29 | 03/23/2010 | Received 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
30 | 04/08/2010 | APPEARANCES: Kent M. Morrow; Kimberlee J. Hegvik, Asst.State's Atty. | |
31 | 04/08/2010 | ARGUED: Morrow; Hegvik | |
32 | 04/08/2010 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
33 | 07/13/2010 | DISPOSITION | |
34 | 07/13/2010 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Crothers, Daniel John | View |
35 | 07/15/2010 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | |
36 | 08/13/2010 | MANDATE | |
37 | 08/16/2010 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
38 | 02/18/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |