Opinions

State v. Lonechild 2023 ND 112
Docket No.: 20230032
Filing Date: 6/8/2023
Case Type: MISC. STATUTORY OFFENSE (FELONY)
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A defendant may be charged with escape under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-08-06 if they are in custody at a facility for custody of persons under charge or conviction of an offense, leave while participating in a work release program, and fail to return to the facility.

“Official detention” as defined by N.D.C.C. § 12.1-08-06(3)(b) precludes only “supervision on probation” and “constraint incidental to release.” The definition of “official detention” does not preclude custody while on probation.

Glasser v. State 2023 ND 111
Docket No.: 20230013
Filing Date: 6/8/2023
Case Type: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Class A misdemeanors involving different crimes committed against different victims on different dates can be consecutively sentenced under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-11(3).

Whether a crime was committed as part of a different course of conduct is a mixed question of law and fact.

Interest of I.X.F. 2023 ND 110
Docket No.: 20230112
Filing Date: 6/8/2023
Case Type: TERMINATION/PARENTAL RIGHTS
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

O'Neal v. State 2023 ND 109
Docket No.: 20220353
Filing Date: 6/8/2023
Case Type: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A district court’s order denying a post-conviction relief application based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed.

To succeed on a post-conviction relief claim based on newly discovered evidence a defendant must show 1) evidence was discovered after trial, 2) the failure to learn about the evidence was not the result of defendant’s lack of diligence, 3) the newly discovered evidence was material to the issues, and 4) the weight and quality of the evidence would likely have resulted in an acquittal.

To prove post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel an applicant must 1) show that counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and 2) show that there was a reasonable probability that, but for the counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of proceeding would have been different.

Etemad v. State 2023 ND 108
Docket No.: 20220373
Filing Date: 6/8/2023
Case Type: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: The district court may summarily dismiss a petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief without giving notice when the application on its face is meritless and fails to allege any supporting facts.

Interest of T.H.P.B. 2023 ND 107
Docket No.: 20230106
Filing Date: 5/30/2023
Case Type: TERMINATION/PARENTAL RIGHTS
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Sanchez 2023 ND 106
Docket No.: 20220335
Filing Date: 5/30/2023
Case Type: SEXUAL OFFENSE
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: The district court abuses its discretion when it allows testimony regarding statements made by a victim before the victim testifies and is subject to cross-examination regarding those statements.

Allowing testimony regarding statements made by a victim before the victim testifies and is subject to cross-examination regarding those statements will be considered harmless if the testimony of the witnesses was merely cumulative to that of the victim.

Substantial evidence existed to support the conviction and is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Brown v. State 2023 ND 105
Docket No.: 20220341
Filing Date: 5/30/2023
Case Type: POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

An attorney’s actions during voir dire are considered matters of trial strategy.

An unsuccessful trial strategy does not make defense counsel’s assistance defective, and we will not second-guess counsel’s defense strategy through the distorting effects of hindsight.

State v. Johnson 2023 ND 104
Docket No.: 20220331
Filing Date: 5/30/2023
Case Type: MISC. STATUTORY OFFENSE (FELONY)
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions of domestic violence and false information or report to law enforcement are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

Rocket Dogs K-9 Aquatics & Wellness Center v. Derheim, et al. 2023 ND 103
Docket No.: 20220246
Filing Date: 5/30/2023
Case Type: OTHER (Civil)
Author: Bahr, Douglas Alan

Highlight: An attorney may not compromise a client’s claims in the absence of express authority, and an attorney may not waive a client’s substantial rights without the client’s consent. Whether an attorney has been given express authority to settle a claim normally presents a question of fact.

The trial court may take one of three possible avenues to decide a motion to enforce a settlement agreement: (1) hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion to determine disputed facts and then enter judgment after taking evidence to prove the agreement and any defenses that the nonmoving party may proffer, (2) dispose of the motion on the pleadings, or (3) treat the motion as akin to one for summary judgment.

Whether a party is entitled to a jury trial depends on whether the case is an action at law or a claim in equity. Historically, specific performance has been an equitable remedy, and no jury trial is available on such claims.

When conflicting testimony is presented, our ability to examine a cold record is a poor substitute for the fact finder’s opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witnesses.