Opinions
1 - 10 of 13024 results
State v. Lonechild
2023 ND 112
Highlight: A defendant may be charged with escape under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-08-06 if they are in custody at a facility for custody of persons under charge or conviction of an offense, leave while participating in a work release program, and fail to return to the facility. |
Glasser v. State
2023 ND 111
Highlight: Class A misdemeanors involving different crimes committed against different victims on different dates can be consecutively sentenced under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-11(3). |
Interest of I.X.F.
2023 ND 110 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
O'Neal v. State
2023 ND 109
Highlight: A district court’s order denying a post-conviction relief application based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed. |
Etemad v. State
2023 ND 108
Highlight: The district court may summarily dismiss a petitioner’s application for post-conviction relief without giving notice when the application on its face is meritless and fails to allege any supporting facts. |
Interest of T.H.P.B.
2023 ND 107 Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Sanchez
2023 ND 106
Highlight: The district court abuses its discretion when it allows testimony regarding statements made by a victim before the victim testifies and is subject to cross-examination regarding those statements. |
Brown v. State
2023 ND 105
Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Johnson
2023 ND 104 Highlight: Convictions of domestic violence and false information or report to law enforcement are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Rocket Dogs K-9 Aquatics & Wellness Center v. Derheim, et al.
2023 ND 103
Highlight: An attorney may not compromise a client’s claims in the absence of express authority, and an attorney may not waive a client’s substantial rights without the client’s consent. Whether an attorney has been given express authority to settle a claim normally presents a question of fact. |