Baity v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al.
Docket No. 20040096
Oral Argument:
Wednesday, September 1, 2004 4:00pm
Docket Info
- Title
- Esther Baity, Claimant and Appellant
v.
Workforce Safety & Insurance, Appellee
and
Case New Holland, , Respondent - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : WORKERS COMPENSATION
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 03-C-02519
East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Cynthia Rothe-Seeger
2004 ND 184687 N.W.2d 714
Highlight
Supplementary disability benefits may be awarded only after Workforce Safety and Insurance has determined the claimant is incapable of rehabilitation of earnings capacity and is therefore permanently and totally disabled.
An agency's systemic disregard of the law may warrant reversing the agency decision without a showing of prejudice by the party relying on the improper conduct, but evidence of a single improper act is not sufficient to establish systemic disregard.
Counsel
Party | Type | Name |
---|---|---|
APPELLEE | SPEC. ASST. ATTY. GEN. | Jacqueline Sue Anderson - 05322 |
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 04/06/2004 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 04/02/2004 | |
2 | 04/26/2004 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF; AFFIDAVIT OF GOOD CAUSE (Mark G. Schneider) | |
3 | 04/26/2004 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 06/11/2004 | |
4 | 05/05/2004 | RECORD ON APPEAL & Certificate of Record on Appeal to Dist. Ct. (incl. TRA of Administrative | |
5 | 05/05/2004 | Hearing dated 5-01-03) | |
6 | 05/11/2004 | DISK - tra (5-1-03) | |
7 | 06/09/2004 | APPELLANT BRIEF & Addendum | View |
8 | 06/09/2004 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
9 | 06/10/2004 | DISK - atb | |
10 | 06/10/2004 | MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES & BRIEF IN SUPPORT - RspDue : 07/12/2004 | |
11 | 06/16/2004 | Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Response to Motion for Atty Fees and Brief/Support | |
12 | 06/16/2004 | ACTION BY CLERK (Ext/Time/Respond/Mot/Atty Fees) - Granted : 07/12/2004 | |
13 | 06/17/2004 | Faxed letter dtd 6-17-04 from Mark Schneider re no objection to Mot. for Mot. for Enlarge. of Time | |
14 | 07/01/2004 | Letter dated 6-30-04 from Mark G. Schneider re oral argument | |
15 | 07/12/2004 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
16 | 07/13/2004 | DISK - AEB | |
17 | 07/13/2004 | Response BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES ON APPEAL | |
18 | 07/28/2004 | REPLY BRIEF of Appellant | View |
19 | 07/29/2004 | DISK - RYB | |
20 | 08/16/2004 | S.CT. DETERMINED ORAL ARGUMENT NOT NECESSARY | |
21 | 09/01/2004 | APPEARANCES: submitted on briefs under NDRAppP 34(a)(2) | |
22 | 09/01/2004 | ARGUED: submitted on briefs under NDRAppP 34(a)(2)(Vol. Z; Page 13) | |
23 | 10/12/2004 | NO SEPARATE ACTION TAKEN ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES | |
24 | 10/12/2004 | DISPOSITION | |
25 | 10/12/2004 | SPLIT OPINION : Neumann, William A. | View |
26 | 10/12/2004 | (DISSENT) : Maring, Mary Muehlen | |
27 | 10/12/2004 | Costs on appeal taxed under § 65-10-03 | |
28 | 10/18/2004 | Judgment Mailed to Parties | |
29 | 10/25/2004 | PETITION FOR REHEARING | View |
30 | 11/02/2004 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Petition/Rehearing) - Denied | |
31 | 11/10/2004 | MANDATE | |
32 | 11/15/2004 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
33 | 06/14/2011 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |