Ackre v. Chapman & Chapman, P.C.
Docket No. 20100044
Oral Argument:
Thursday, May 6, 2010 9:30am
Docket Info
- Title
- Robert Ackre, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Chapman & Chapman, P.C., Defendant and Appellee - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : OTHER (Civil)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 09-C-00155
Northeast Judicial District, Rolette County
Michael G. Sturdevant
2010 ND 167788 N.W.2d 344
Oral Argument
5/6/2010
Highlight
To have standing, a litigant must have suffered some threatened or actual injury resulting from the putatively illegal action, the asserted harm must not be a generalized grievance shared by all or a large class of citizens, and the litigant generally must assert his or her own legal rights and interests and cannot rest a claim for relief on the legal rights and interests of third parties.
A plaintiff may have standing to bring an unlawful practice claim against a business competitor if the plaintiff can show the putatively illegal action caused some threatened or actual injury to his or her legal rights and interests.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 02/05/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 01/29/2010 | |
2 | 02/24/2010 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
3 | 02/24/2010 | APPELLANT BRIEF & Addendum | View |
4 | 02/24/2010 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
5 | 02/24/2010 | DISK - atb (e-mailed) | |
6 | 03/08/2010 | Additional copies of pages for the ATA & unbound originals of ATB, Addendum & ATA | |
7 | 03/17/2010 | 1st Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 3-12-10 (Entry Nos. 31-33) | |
8 | 03/17/2010 | Copies of Judgment of Dismissal & Amended NOA for ATA | |
9 | 03/19/2010 | 2nd Supplemental Clerk's Certificate of Record dated March 17, 2010 (Entry Nos. 34-36). | |
10 | 03/29/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF | |
11 | 03/29/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK (w/understanding oral argument will be in May) - Granted : 04/12/2010 | |
12 | 04/12/2010 | APPELLEE BRIEF | View |
13 | 04/12/2010 | DISK - AEB | |
14 | 04/19/2010 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
15 | 04/29/2010 | REPLY BRIEF of Appellant | View |
16 | 04/29/2010 | DISK - RYB (e-mailed) | |
17 | 05/06/2010 | APPEARANCES: Larry M. Baer and Robert Ackre; Patrick W. Durick and Zachary E. Pelham | |
18 | 05/06/2010 | ARGUED: Baer; Durick | |
19 | 05/06/2010 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
20 | 08/16/2010 | CITATION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES. | |
21 | 08/31/2010 | DISPOSITION | |
22 | 08/31/2010 | SPLIT OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
23 | 08/31/2010 | (CONCURRING SPECIALLY) : Sandstrom, Dale V. | |
24 | 08/31/2010 | Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee | |
25 | 09/01/2010 | Judgment E-Mailed to Parties | |
26 | 09/13/2010 | PETITION FOR REHEARING & ADDENDUM | View |
27 | 09/13/2010 | DISK-PER (E-MAILED) | |
28 | 09/16/2010 | Letter from Larry Baer dated 9-14-10 RE: Supplemental Clarification of PER | |
29 | 09/21/2010 | Letter from Patrick Durick dated 9-21-10 regarding Mr. Baer's letter dated 9-14-10 | |
30 | 10/19/2010 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (PER) - Denied | |
31 | 11/01/2010 | MANDATE | |
32 | 11/08/2010 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
33 | 06/21/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |