Krueger v. Krueger
Docket No. 20100264
Oral Argument:
Tuesday, April 5, 2011 9:30am
Docket Info
- Title
- Debra Krueger, n/k/a
Deborah Bentz, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Gregory Krueger, Defendant and Appellant - Case Type
- CIVIL APPEAL : CHILD CUST & SUPPORT (Div.\Other)
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 02-C-0118
Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Harlan Patrick Weir
2011 ND 134800 N.W.2d 296
Oral Argument
4/5/2011
Highlight
While the district court may not solely rely on a child's preferences regarding visitation, they may be a relevant consideration in the best interests of the child analysis.
In calculating a parent's child support obligation, the district court must clearly set forth how it arrived at a net income figure.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 08/09/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/05/2010 | |
2 | 08/09/2010 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 08/05/2010 | |
3 | 09/21/2010 | RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: pending completion of transcript : 10/29/2010 | |
4 | 09/27/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT | |
5 | 09/27/2010 | ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 10/29/2010 | |
6 | 10/28/2010 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED March 10, 2010 & May 10, 2010 (2 volumes) & C.O.S. | |
7 | 10/28/2010 | DISK - tra (3/10/10 & 5/10/10) (e-mailed) | |
8 | 11/02/2010 | RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) and Separate (Entry No. 109A). | |
9 | 11/29/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | |
10 | 11/29/2010 | E-FILED MOTION (MAT) | |
11 | 11/29/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 01/06/2011 | |
12 | 01/03/2011 | APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
13 | 01/03/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (ATB) | |
14 | 01/03/2011 | APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed) | |
15 | 01/03/2011 | E-FILED APPENDIX (ata) | |
16 | 01/04/2011 | Received $25 surcharge for atb (Receipt #20120) | |
17 | 01/06/2011 | Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD | |
18 | 01/06/2011 | Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD | |
19 | 01/25/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)(faxed) | |
20 | 01/25/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (MAE) (faxed) | |
21 | 01/25/2011 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 03/04/2011 | |
22 | 01/27/2011 | MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OF THE APPELLANT (e-filed) - RspDue : 02/09/2011 | |
23 | 01/27/2011 | E-FILED MOTION (Mot./Dismiss) | |
24 | 01/28/2011 | Response Filed to Motion to Dismiss | |
25 | 01/28/2011 | EFILED RESPONSE | |
26 | 02/02/2011 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied | |
27 | 02/02/2011 | Order/Judgment Sent to Parties | |
28 | 02/02/2011 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (Southwest Area Child Support Enforcement Unit) | |
29 | 02/02/2011 | ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (sua sponte - MAE) - Granted : 03/19/2011 | |
30 | 02/02/2011 | Appellee, Krueger, brief due March 4, 2011 | |
31 | 03/02/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
32 | 03/02/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
33 | 03/07/2011 | Receipt for $25.00 AEB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20210) | |
34 | 03/09/2011 | Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (Krueger) back from Central Duplicating. | |
35 | 03/17/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF (CHILD SUPPORT) | View |
36 | 03/17/2011 | APPELLEE APPENDIX (CHILD SUPPORT) | |
37 | 03/18/2011 | DISK-AEB (CHILD SUPPORT) CD-ROM | |
38 | 03/22/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
39 | 04/05/2011 | APPEARANCES: Kent A. Morrow; Diane F. Melbye; and Rhonda R. Ehlis, Spec. Asst. Attny. General | |
40 | 04/05/2011 | ARGUED: Morrow; Melbye; Ehlis | |
41 | 04/05/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
42 | 07/13/2011 | DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED) | |
43 | 07/13/2011 | SPLIT OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. | View |
44 | 07/13/2011 | (CONCUR IN THE RESULT) : Crothers, Daniel John | |
45 | 07/13/2011 | (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART) : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | |
46 | 07/13/2011 | (JOINED IN CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART) : Maring, Mary Muehlen | |
47 | 07/13/2011 | Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal | |
48 | 07/14/2011 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
49 | 08/09/2011 | MANDATE | |
50 | 08/11/2011 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
51 | 09/21/2011 | Corrected Opinion Pages 3 & 5 |