Search Tips

Krueger v. Krueger

Docket No. 20100264
Oral Argument: Tuesday, April 5, 2011 9:30am

Docket Info

Title
Debra Krueger, n/k/a
Deborah Bentz, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Gregory Krueger, Defendant and Appellant
Case Type
CIVIL APPEAL : CHILD CUST & SUPPORT (Div.\Other)
Appeal From
Case No. 02-C-0118
Southwest Judicial District, Stark County
Harlan Patrick Weir
2011 ND 134800 N.W.2d 296
Oral Argument 4/5/2011

Highlight

While the district court may not solely rely on a child's preferences regarding visitation, they may be a relevant consideration in the best interests of the child analysis.
In calculating a parent's child support obligation, the district court must clearly set forth how it arrived at a net income figure.


Briefs

Filing Date Description
01/03/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
03/02/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
03/17/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (CHILD SUPPORT) View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLEE CHILD SUP. ENFORCEMENT Rhonda Rae Ehlis - 05171
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Diane Fabel Melbye - 03680
APPELLANT PRIVATE PRACTICE Kent M Morrow - 03503

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 08/09/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 08/05/2010
2 08/09/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 08/05/2010
3 09/21/2010 RETENTION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: pending completion of transcript : 10/29/2010
4 09/27/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME TRANSCRIPT
5 09/27/2010 ACTION BY TRIAL COURT - Granted : 10/29/2010
6 10/28/2010 TRANSCRIPTS DATED March 10, 2010 & May 10, 2010 (2 volumes) & C.O.S.
7 10/28/2010 DISK - tra (3/10/10 & 5/10/10) (e-mailed)
8 11/02/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL (3 volumes) and Separate (Entry No. 109A).
9 11/29/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed)
10 11/29/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAT)
11 11/29/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAT) - Granted : 01/06/2011
12 01/03/2011 APPELLANT BRIEF (e-filed) View
13 01/03/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
14 01/03/2011 APPELLANT APPENDIX (e-filed)
15 01/03/2011 E-FILED APPENDIX (ata)
16 01/04/2011 Received $25 surcharge for atb (Receipt #20120)
17 01/06/2011 Received 7 copies of ATB from CSD
18 01/06/2011 Received 6 copies of ATA from CSD
19 01/25/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)(faxed)
20 01/25/2011 E-FILED MOTION (MAE) (faxed)
21 01/25/2011 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 03/04/2011
22 01/27/2011 MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL OF THE APPELLANT (e-filed) - RspDue : 02/09/2011
23 01/27/2011 E-FILED MOTION (Mot./Dismiss)
24 01/28/2011 Response Filed to Motion to Dismiss
25 01/28/2011 EFILED RESPONSE
26 02/02/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT - Denied
27 02/02/2011 Order/Judgment Sent to Parties
28 02/02/2011 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (Southwest Area Child Support Enforcement Unit)
29 02/02/2011 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (sua sponte - MAE) - Granted : 03/19/2011
30 02/02/2011 Appellee, Krueger, brief due March 4, 2011
31 03/02/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
32 03/02/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
33 03/07/2011 Receipt for $25.00 AEB e-file surcharge. (receipt no. 20210)
34 03/09/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB (Krueger) back from Central Duplicating.
35 03/17/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (CHILD SUPPORT) View
36 03/17/2011 APPELLEE APPENDIX (CHILD SUPPORT)
37 03/18/2011 DISK-AEB (CHILD SUPPORT) CD-ROM
38 03/22/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
39 04/05/2011 APPEARANCES: Kent A. Morrow; Diane F. Melbye; and Rhonda R. Ehlis, Spec. Asst. Attny. General
40 04/05/2011 ARGUED: Morrow; Melbye; Ehlis
41 04/05/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
42 07/13/2011 DISPOSITION (AND REMANDED)
43 07/13/2011 SPLIT OPINION : Sandstrom, Dale V. View
44 07/13/2011 (CONCUR IN THE RESULT) : Crothers, Daniel John
45 07/13/2011 (CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART) : Kapsner, Carol Ronning
46 07/13/2011 (JOINED IN CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART) : Maring, Mary Muehlen
47 07/13/2011 Neither party shall have and recover costs on appeal
48 07/14/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
49 08/09/2011 MANDATE
50 08/11/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
51 09/21/2011 Corrected Opinion Pages 3 & 5