Search Tips

State v. Woodrow

Docket No. 20100334
Oral Argument: Friday, February 25, 2011 2:45pm

Docket Info

Title
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Michael Woodrow, Defendant and Appellee
Case Type
CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
Appeal From
Case No. 10-K-00006
Northwest Judicial District, Divide County
David W. Nelson
2011 ND 192803 N.W.2d 572
Oral Argument 2/25/2011

Highlight

Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which is fully reviewable on appeal.
Words in a statute are given their plain, ordinary, and commonly understood meaning, unless they are defined by statute or unless a contrary intention plainly appears.
A person may be prosecuted in district court as an adult if the person is at least twenty years of age, committed an offense while a child, and was not adjudicated for the offense in juvenile court, unless the state intentionally delayed the prosecution to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction.

Briefs

Filing Date Description
11/29/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF View
01/28/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
02/15/2011 REPLY BRIEF View

Counsel

Party Type Name
APPELLANT STATE'S ATTORNEY Elizabeth Ledgerwood Pendlay - 06372
APPELLEE PRIVATE PRACTICE Tom P Slorby - 03122

(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)

Seq. # Filing Date Description Attachment
1 10/11/2010 NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/06/2010
2 10/11/2010 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 10/06/2010
3 10/12/2010 Consolidated w/20100335-20100337. Make all entries except DIS & MAN in this case.
4 10/20/2010 TRANSCRIPTS DATED 2/10/10, 5/26/10 AND 9/13/10 & C.O.S.
5 10/20/2010 DISK-TRA (2/10/10, 5/26/10 AND 9/13/10) E-MAILED
6 11/05/2010 RECORD ON APPEAL
7 11/29/2010 APPELLANT BRIEF View
8 11/29/2010 APPELLANT APPENDIX
9 11/30/2010 DISK-ATB (CD-ROM)
10 12/01/2010 Received 8 cover pgs of ATA in white, corrected ATA pages & Table of Contents.
11 12/23/2010 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed)
12 12/23/2010 E-FILED MOTION (MAE)
13 12/23/2010 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 01/31/2011
14 12/27/2010 Appellant's Resistance to Appellee's Request for Extension of Time to File Appellee's Brief(e-filed
15 01/19/2011 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT
16 01/28/2011 APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) View
17 01/28/2011 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
18 01/31/2011 Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20155)
19 02/01/2011 Rec'd 7 copies of AEB from CSD
20 02/04/2011 MOTION TO SUBMIT REPLY BRIEF IN EXCESS OF WHAT IS ALLOWED BY N.D.R.App.P.
21 02/04/2011 ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Granted in part) - Granted
22 02/04/2011 Leave to file reply brief with 1000 extra words granted
23 02/15/2011 REPLY BRIEF View
24 02/16/2011 DISK-RYB (CD-ROM)
25 02/25/2011 APPEARANCES: Elizabeth L. Pendlay; Tom P. Slorby
26 02/25/2011 ARGUED: Elizabeth L. Pendlay; Tom P. Slorby
27 02/25/2011 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
28 09/15/2011 DISPOSITION
29 09/15/2011 UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning View
30 09/16/2011 Judgment Sent to Parties
31 10/10/2011 MANDATE
32 10/17/2011 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
33 04/30/2021 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed