State v. Woodrow
Docket No. 20100334
Oral Argument:
Friday, February 25, 2011 2:45pm
Docket Info
- Title
- State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Michael Woodrow, Defendant and Appellee - Case Type
- CRIMINAL APPEAL : SEXUAL OFFENSE
- Appeal From
-
Case No. 10-K-00006
Northwest Judicial District, Divide County
David W. Nelson
2011 ND 192803 N.W.2d 572
Oral Argument
2/25/2011
Highlight
Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which is fully reviewable on appeal.
Words in a statute are given their plain, ordinary, and commonly understood meaning, unless they are defined by statute or unless a contrary intention plainly appears.
A person may be prosecuted in district court as an adult if the person is at least twenty years of age, committed an offense while a child, and was not adjudicated for the offense in juvenile court, unless the state intentionally delayed the prosecution to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction.
(Note: Attachments may not be available for recently filed cases and/or confidential documents.)
Seq. # | Filing Date | Description | Attachment |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 10/11/2010 | NOTICE OF APPEAL : 10/06/2010 | |
2 | 10/11/2010 | ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT : 10/06/2010 | |
3 | 10/12/2010 | Consolidated w/20100335-20100337. Make all entries except DIS & MAN in this case. | |
4 | 10/20/2010 | TRANSCRIPTS DATED 2/10/10, 5/26/10 AND 9/13/10 & C.O.S. | |
5 | 10/20/2010 | DISK-TRA (2/10/10, 5/26/10 AND 9/13/10) E-MAILED | |
6 | 11/05/2010 | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
7 | 11/29/2010 | APPELLANT BRIEF | View |
8 | 11/29/2010 | APPELLANT APPENDIX | |
9 | 11/30/2010 | DISK-ATB (CD-ROM) | |
10 | 12/01/2010 | Received 8 cover pgs of ATA in white, corrected ATA pages & Table of Contents. | |
11 | 12/23/2010 | MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | |
12 | 12/23/2010 | E-FILED MOTION (MAE) | |
13 | 12/23/2010 | ACTION BY CLERK (MAE) - Granted : 01/31/2011 | |
14 | 12/27/2010 | Appellant's Resistance to Appellee's Request for Extension of Time to File Appellee's Brief(e-filed | |
15 | 01/19/2011 | NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT SENT | |
16 | 01/28/2011 | APPELLEE BRIEF (e-filed) | View |
17 | 01/28/2011 | E-FILED BRIEF (AEB) | |
18 | 01/31/2011 | Received $25 surcharge for AEB (Receipt #20155) | |
19 | 02/01/2011 | Rec'd 7 copies of AEB from CSD | |
20 | 02/04/2011 | MOTION TO SUBMIT REPLY BRIEF IN EXCESS OF WHAT IS ALLOWED BY N.D.R.App.P. | |
21 | 02/04/2011 | ACTION BY CHIEF JUSTICE (Granted in part) - Granted | |
22 | 02/04/2011 | Leave to file reply brief with 1000 extra words granted | |
23 | 02/15/2011 | REPLY BRIEF | View |
24 | 02/16/2011 | DISK-RYB (CD-ROM) | |
25 | 02/25/2011 | APPEARANCES: Elizabeth L. Pendlay; Tom P. Slorby | |
26 | 02/25/2011 | ARGUED: Elizabeth L. Pendlay; Tom P. Slorby | |
27 | 02/25/2011 | ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST | |
28 | 09/15/2011 | DISPOSITION | |
29 | 09/15/2011 | UNANIMOUS OPINION : Kapsner, Carol Ronning | View |
30 | 09/16/2011 | Judgment Sent to Parties | |
31 | 10/10/2011 | MANDATE | |
32 | 10/17/2011 | RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE | |
33 | 04/30/2021 | EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed |